Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Association-led and Trust Company-led Methods in Reconstruction Business and Reconstruction Charges

조합방식과 신탁방식의 재건축사업 및 재건축부담금에 관한 비교 연구

  • 이한창 (서울벤처대학원대학교 부동산학과) ;
  • 유선종 (건국대학교 부동산학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.22
  • Accepted : 2019.06.18
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, to solve the problem of the Association-led Housing Reconstruction Business (AHRB), as an alternative to the AHRB, the reliability of the Trust company-led Housing Reconstruction Business (THRB) is verified. To this end, the AHRB and the THRB comparison analyses were performed for the project period, income and expenditure, and the calculation of the Reconstruction Charges (RC). The results of the study are as follows: First, the THRB's business period is shorter than the AHRB's. Second, the THRB's business value is likely to be superior to the AHRB's. Third, due to differences in the calculation period of excess profit for housing reconstruction and the cost items related to implementer, the THRB's RC will be less than the AHRB's RC. Thus, the stability of the THRB has been partially verified as an alternative to the AHRB. The THRB is expected to expand further in the future.

본 연구는 조합방식 재건축사업의 문제점을 해결하기 위하여, 조합방식 재건축사업의 대안으로 신탁방식 재건축사업의 신뢰성을 검증한다. 이를 위해 조합방식 재건축사업과 신탁방식 재건축사업의 사업기간, 사업수지, 재건축부담금 산정내역 등의 비교분석을 진행하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사업 기간은 신탁방식의 재건축사업이 조합방식의 재건축사업보다 짧다. 둘째, 사업성은 신탁방식이 조합방식보다 좋을 가능성이 크다. 셋째, 재건축초과이익 산정 기간의 차이와 시행 주체 관련 비용 항목의 차이로 인하여 신탁방식이 조합방식보다 재건축부담금을 적게 부담하게 된다. 따라서 조합방식 재건축사업의 대안으로서 신탁방식 재건축사업의 안정성은 부분적으로 검증되었다. 신탁방식 재건축사업은 앞으로 더 확대될 것으로 예상된다.

Keywords

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_29_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Trust company-led Housing Reconstruction Business

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_29_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Comparisons of minimum duration by step between the AHRB and the THRB

Table 1. The present situation of Reconstruction Projects in Seoul

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_29_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Business Balance Comparisons between the AHRB and the THRB

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_29_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Comparisons between the AHRB's RC and the THRB's.

HGGTBM_2019_v49n1_29_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Kim DK. 2012. Legal Study on Improvement Plans for the Housing Redevelopment and Reconstruction [dissertation]. Soongsil University
  2. Kim MM. 2018. A Study on Perception of Union members for reconstructed extra profit return system [dissertation]. Dong Eui University.
  3. Kim JS, Jang HS. 2010. Trust-method Applying to the Multi-Family Reconstruction Project. The Korea Society of Cadastre. 26(2).
  4. Nam YK. 2007. A Legal Study on the Relationship Between City Improvement Project and Real Estate Trust [dissertation]. Dankook University.
  5. Park KY. 2015. A Study on Trust Business entity' Participation in the Implementation of Rearrangement Projects. The Korean Journal of Financial Law. 12(1).
  6. Sohn YM. 2010. A Study on the Connection Methods of Real Estate Trust System and Urban Renewal Project [dissertation]. Kwangwoon University.
  7. Shin SC. 2009. A Study on the Political Recommendations of Payment Criteria of Reconstruction Charge [dissertation]. Konkuk University
  8. Chung JH. 2009. A Study on improving the Restitution of Development Profit of the Reconstruction [dissertation]. Konkuk University.
  9. Cho HS. 2017. A Study on Vitalization of Housing Rearrangement Projects Led by Real Estate Trust Companies [dissertation]. Sangmyung University.
  10. Ha SH. 2017. A plan to revitalize housing reconstruction business by trust method [dissertation]. Myongji University.
  11. Hwang ED. 2008. A Study on Possible Ways to Improve Recapture System for Excess Gains of Housing Reconstruction Project [dissertation]. Korea University.