Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The relationship between vowel production and proficiency levels in L2 English produced by Korean EFL learners

  • Lee, Seohee (Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University) ;
  • Rhee, Seok-Chae (Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2019.03.19
  • Accepted : 2019.06.23
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between accurate vowel production and proficiency levels in L2 English produced by Korean EFL adult learners. To this end, nine English vowels /i, ɪ, ɛ, æ, ʌ, ɔ, ɑ, ʊ, u/ were selected and adjacent vowels paired up (e.g., /i/-/ɪ/, /u/-/ʊ/, /ɛ/-/æ/, /ʌ/-/ɔ/, /ɔ/-/ɑ/). The spectral features of the pairs were measured instrumentally, namely F1 (indicating tongue height) and F2 (indicating tongue backness). Meanwhile, the durations as well as spectral features of the tense and lax counterparts in /i/-/ɪ/ and /u/-/ʊ/ were measured, as both temporal and spectral features are important in distinguishing them. The findings of this study confirm that higher-rated speakers were better able to distinguish the contrasts in the front vowel pairs /i/-/ɪ/ and /ɛ/-/æ/ than lower-rated learners, but in the central and back vowel pairs /u/-/ʊ/and /ʌ/-/ɔ/ (though not /ɔ/-/ɑ/), Korean EFL learners generally showed difficulty distinguishing adjacent vowels with spectral cues. On the other hand, the durations of the tense and lax vowels showed that the lower-rated speakers were less able to use the temporal feature to differentiate tense vowels from their lax counterparts, unlike previous studies that found that in general Korean learners depend excessively on the temporal cue to distinguish tense and lax vowels.

Keywords

References

  1. Alfonso, P. J., & Baer, T. (1982). Dynamics of vowel articulation. Language and Speech, 25(2), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500203
  2. Best, C. T. (1991, April). Phonetic influences on the perception of non-native speech contrasts by 6-8 and 10-12 month-olds. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.
  3. Campbell, D. F., McDonnell, C., Meinardi, M., & Richardson, B. (2007). The need for a speech corpus. ReCALL, 19(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344007000213
  4. Cho, C. (2017). Analysis of phonetic and phonological accent in rated L2 read speech corpus of Korean learners of English (Master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Cho, T., Kim, S., & Hur, Y. (2013). Effects of prosodic strengthening on the production of English high front vowels /i, ɪ/ by native vs. non-native speakers. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5(4), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2013.5.4.129
  6. Cutler, A., Smits, R., & Cooper, N. (2005). Vowel perception:Effects of non-native language vs. non-native dialect. Speech Communication, 47(1-2), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.001
  7. Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x
  8. Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mitterer, H. (2012). The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners:Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.004
  9. Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6
  10. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 229-273). Timonium, MD:York Press.
  11. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437-470. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
  12. Fougeron, C., & Keating, P. A. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(6), 3728-3740. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418332
  13. Franklin, A. D. (2009). English vowel production in Japanese, Korean, and Spanish ESL speakers before and after vowel-focused pronunciation training (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  14. Ho, Y. K. (2010). The perception and production of American English front vowels by EFL learners in Taiwan: The influence of first language and proficiency levels (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  15. Hong, S. (2012). The relative perceptual easiness between perceptually assimilated vowels for university-level Korean learners of American English and measurement bias in an identification test. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 18(3), 491-511. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2012.18.3.491
  16. Hwang, I., & Lee, S. (2012). Perception of English vowel categories by Korean university students. Linguistics, 37(4), 1095-1117.
  17. Ingram, J. C., & Park, S. G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 343-370. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0048
  18. Jones, D. (1960). An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.
  19. Kenyon, J. S., & Knott, T. A. (1953). A pronouncing dictionary of American English. Springfield, MA: Merriam.
  20. Kim, J. E. (2007). A phonetic study of Koreans' production of English vowels and their pronunciation pedagogy. Linguistics, 15(4), 41-54.
  21. Kim, J. M., Wang, C., Peabody, M., & Seneff, S. (2004, October). An interactive English pronunciation dictionary for Korean learners. Proceedings of the Interspeech 2004-ICSLP, Jeju, Korea.
  22. Klatt, D. H. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics, 3(3), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31360-9
  23. Kong, E. J., & Yoon, I. H. (2013). L2 proficiency effect on the acoustic cue-weighting pattern by Korean L2 learners of English:Production and perception of English stops. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5(4), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2013.5.4.081
  24. Koo, H. (2000). Characteristics of English vowels spoken by Koreans. Speech Sciences, 7(3), 99-108.
  25. Ladefoged, P., & Disner, S. F. (2012). Vowels and consonants (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  26. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  27. Lee, J. W. (2018). Degree of phonological rule transfer: Evidence from L2 English production by L1 Korean speakers (Master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  28. Li, J. H., & Lee, S. H. (2017). An acoustic study on English tense-lax vowel pairs produced by Chinese and Korean speakers. Wonkwang Journal of Humanities, 18(1), 283-306.
  29. Maddieson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In W. J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 619-639). Cambridge: Blackwell.
  30. Mauranen, A. (2004). Speech corpora in the classroom. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Stewart (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp. 195-211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  31. Park, D., Lee, S., & Cho, M. (2010). Interference of L1 phonological processes in English learning. English Language and Linguistics, 16(3), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.17960/ell.2010.16.3.009
  32. Park, E. (2017). The study of speech rate and pause in rated L2 speech corpus of Korean learners of English (Master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  33. Reetz, H., & Jongman, A. (2009). Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics and perception. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  34. Rhee, S. (2016). Construction of rated Korean L2 English speech corpus. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences 2016 Spring Conference (pp. 125-126). Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Korea.
  35. Tsujimura, N. (1996). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  36. Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Flege, J. (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33(3), 263-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.10.002
  37. Wang, C. (1988). The production and perception of English vowels by native speakers of Mandarin (Doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
  38. Wang, H., & van Heuven, V. J. (2006). Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 23(1), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.23.23wan
  39. Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24(2), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013
  40. Yang, B. (2008). An acoustical comparison of English tense and lax vowels produced by Korean and American males. Speech Sciences, 15(4), 19-27.
  41. Yoon, S. Y., Pierce, L., Huensch, A., Juul, E., Perkins, S., Sproat, R., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2009). Construction of a rated speech corpus of L2 learners' spontaneous speech. CALICO Journal, 26(3), 662-673.
  42. Yun, Y. (2009). Identification of English vowels /u/-/ʊ/ by English and Korean speakers. The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature, 27(4), 241-253.