DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Breast Cancer Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

  • Jeong, Eun Ha (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Choi, Eun Jung (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Choi, Hyemi (Department of Statistics, Chonbuk National University, Research Institute of Applied Statistics) ;
  • Park, Eun Hae (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Song, Ji Soo (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
  • Received : 2019.03.27
  • Accepted : 2019.05.17
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) variables, for axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis in the early stage of breast cancer. Materials and Methods: January 2011-April 2015, 787 patients with early stage of breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Only cases of invasive ductal carcinoma, were included in the patient population. Among them, 240 patients who underwent 3.0-T DCE-MRI, including DWI with b value 0 and $800s/mm^2$ were enrolled. MRI variables (adjacent vessel sign, whole-breast vascularity, initial enhancement pattern, quantitative kinetic parameters, signal enhancement ratio (SER), tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), peritumoral ADC, and peritumor-tumor ADC ratio) clinico-pathologic variables (age, T stage, multifocality, extensive intraductal carcinoma component (EIC), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2 status, Ki-67, molecular subtype, histologic grade, and nuclear grade) were compared between patients with axillary lymph node metastasis and those with no lymph node metastasis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed, to determine independent variables associated with ALN metastasis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), for predicting ALN metastasis was analyzed, for those variables. Results: On breast MRI, moderate or prominent ipsilateral whole-breast vascularity (moderate, odds ratio [OR] 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-9.51 vs. prominent, OR = 15.59, 95% CI 2.52-96.46), SER (OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.09-2.59), and peritumor-tumor ADC ratio (OR = 6.77, 95% CI 2.41-18.99), were independently associated with ALN metastasis. Among clinico-pathologic variables, HER-2 positivity was independently associated, with ALN metastasis (OR = 23.71, 95% CI 10.50-53.54). The AUC for combining selected MRI variables and clinico-pathologic variables, was higher than that of clinico-pathologic variables (P < 0.05). Conclusion: SER, moderate or prominent increased whole breast vascularity, and peritumor-tumor ADC ratio on breast MRI, are valuable in predicting ALN metastasis, in patients with early stage of breast cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Park EH, Min SY, Kim Z, et al. Basic facts of breast cancer in Korea in 2014: The 10-year overall survival progress. J Breast Cancer 2017;20:1-11 https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2017.20.1.1
  2. Kuijs VJ, Moossdorff M, Schipper RJ, et al. The role of MRI in axillary lymph node imaging in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Insights Imaging 2015;6:203-215 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0404-2
  3. Qiu SQ, Zeng HC, Zhang F, et al. A nomogram to predict the probability of axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients with positive axillary ultrasound. Sci Rep 2016;6:21196 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21196
  4. Roaten JB, Pearlman N, Gonzalez R, Gonzalez R, McCarter MD. Identifying risk factors for complications following sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Arch Surg 2005;140:85-89 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.1.85
  5. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011;305:569-575 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.90
  6. Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Tucker SL, et al. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011: impact on surgeon practice patterns. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:3144-3151 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2531-z
  7. Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst HB, Lundgren S, Fjosne HE, Haraldseth O. Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrastenhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1464-1471 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000370
  8. Valente SA, Levine GM, Silverstein MJ, et al. Accuracy of predicting axillary lymph node positivity by physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:1825-1830 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2200-7
  9. Bahri S, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Kuzucan A, Nalcioglu O, Su MY. Can dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) predict tumor recurrence and lymph node status in patients with breast cancer? Ann Oncol 2008;19:822-824 https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn043
  10. Zaiton F, Shehata SM, Abo Warda MH, Alekrashy MA. Diagnostic value of MRI for predicting axillarylymph nodes metastasis in newly diagnosed breastcancer patients: Diffusion-weighted MRI. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2016;47:659-667 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.03.008
  11. Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008;7:23-29 https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.7.23
  12. Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, Cilotti A, Moretti M, Bartolozzi C. Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2646-2655 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0621-2
  13. Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T, et al. Application of breast MRI for prediction of lymph node metastases - systematic approach using 17 individual descriptors and a dedicated decision tree. Acta Radiol 2010;51:885-894 https://doi.org/10.3109/02841851.2010.504232
  14. Luo N, Su D, Jin G, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio between axillary lymph node with primary tumor to detect nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:824-828 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24031
  15. Razek AA, Gaballa G, Denewer A, Nada N. Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors. NMR Biomed 2010;23:619-623 https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1503
  16. Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T, et al. The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:178-186 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.2.178
  17. Knopp MV, Bourne MW, Sardanelli F, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI of the breast: analysis of dose response and comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:663-676 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810663
  18. Kang DK, Kim EJ, Kim HS, Sun JS, Jung YS. Correlation of whole-breast vascularity with ipsilateral breast cancers using contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:496-504 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2784
  19. Esserman L, Hylton N, George T, Weidner N. Contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast J 1999;5:13-21 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001013.x
  20. Mori N, Mugikura S, Takasawa C, et al. Peritumoral apparent diffusion coefficients for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2016;26:331-339 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3847-4
  21. Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A, Carriero A, Kirchin MA. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity. Radiology 2005;235:791-797 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040733
  22. Wright H, Listinsky J, Quinn C, Rim A, Crowe J, Kim J. Increased ipsilateral whole breast vascularity as measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg 2005;190:576-579 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.015
  23. Han M, Kim TH, Kang DK, Kim KS, Yim H. Prognostic role of MRI enhancement features in patients with breast cancer: value of adjacent vessel sign and increased ipsilateral whole-breast vascularity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:921-928 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7895
  24. Bielenberg DR, Zetter BR. The contribution of angiogenesis to the process of metastasis. Cancer J 2015;21:267-273 https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000138
  25. Li KL, Henry RG, Wilmes LJ, et al. Kinetic assessment of breast tumors using high spatial resolution signal enhancement ratio (SER) imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:572-581 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21361
  26. Loiselle CR, Eby PR, Peacock S, Kim JN, Lehman CD. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and invasive breast cancer: primary lesion kinetics correlated with axillary lymph node extracapsular extension. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:96-101 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22389
  27. Cichon MA, Degnim AC, Visscher DW, Radisky DC. Microenvironmental influences that drive progression from benign breast disease to invasive breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2010;15:389-397 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-010-9195-8
  28. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J. Is evaluation of the presence of prepectoral edema on T2-weighted with fatsuppression 3 T breast MRI a simple and readily available noninvasive technique for estimation of prognosis in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer 2014;21:684-692 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0440-z
  29. Durur-Subasi I, Durur-Karakaya A, Karaman A, Seker M, Demirci E, Alper F. Is the necrosis/wall ADC ratio useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions? Br J Radiol 2017;90:20160803 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160803
  30. Ahmed AR. HER2 expression is a strong independent predictor of nodal metastasis in breast cancer. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2016;28:219-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnci.2016.09.002
  31. Dittrich A, Gautrey H, Browell D, Tyson-Capper A. The HER2 signaling network in breast cancer--like a spider in its web. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2014;19:253-270 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-014-9329-5

Cited by

  1. Prior to Breast MRI Guidelines in Korea, Where Were We? vol.25, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13104/imri.2021.25.1.35