DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

남북 투자분쟁해결의 법적쟁점에 관한 고찰

A Study on the Legal Issues of Inter-Korean Investment Disputes Settlement System

  • 오현석 (대한상사중재원 중재사업본부)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.20
  • 심사 : 2019.05.31
  • 발행 : 2019.06.01

초록

The resumption of economic cooperation between South and the North Korea will be a new growth engine for our economy. Many Korean companies are preparing to invest in North Korea in accordance with the progress of inter-Korean relations. However, there are many risks inherent in inter-Korean economic cooperation, as experienced in previous cases. Specifically, one should be prepared for unfair measures such as the expropriation of investment assets of South Korean enterprises by North Korea authorities. Therefore, it is essential to review the protection measures of investment in North Korea and to review the investment dispute settlement system. The South and the North have an agreement to establish the inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration Committee to resolve the disputes that may arise if one party's investments are lost due to inappropriate or unfair measures due to the other party's authority. However, the Investment Agreement, which governs the Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration Committee, contains a number of declarative statements that are somewhat ineffective. Even today, nearly 20 years after the adoption of the Agreement, the specific detailed procedures have shown no real progress, such as in the enactment of arbitration rules. Therefore, at present, it is difficult to expect a system that can effectively address the damage of our corporations which have invested in North Korea. When the assets freeze after the suspension of Kumgang tourism and the closure of the Kaeseung Industrial Complex by North Korea, the activation of the inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration Committee is the most important prerequisite for economic cooperation with North Korea. For this purpose, the resolution of disputes through the Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration Committee has to be made more concrete, with the effectiveness of the dispute settlement system enhanced by means of various efforts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강병근, ICSID 중재제도 연구, 법무부 국제법무과, 2006,
  2. 목영준, 상사중재법, 박영사, 2011
  3. 박노형 외2인, '투자자국가최신판정분석', 법무부, 2014. 4.
  4. 변필건, 한국의 투자협정 해설서, 법무부, 2010.
  5. 신희택, 국제투자분쟁에서의 UNCITRAL 중재규칙 활용실무, 법무부, 2013.
  6. 양효령, '중국외상투자기업법제', 진원사, 2007. 10.
  7. 정수봉, 한미 FTA 투자분야 연구, 법무부, 2008.
  8. 한찬식 외 2인, '한일투자협정해설', 산업연구원, 2003. 10.
  9. 김명기, '남북상사중재위원회 구성.운영합의서 해설', 중재 제311호, 대한상사중재원, 2004. 3.
  10. 김상호, '남북한 상사분쟁의 해결에 관한 연구', 한국중재학회지:중재연구, v.16, no.2, 2006. 8.
  11. 김연호, '남북중재규정 제정의 기본방향', 한국중재학회지:중재연구, v.15, no.1, 2005. 3.
  12. 문준조, '국제법의 전망과 쟁점', 법제연구, 2008. 12. 20.
  13. 박종삼, '남북중재규정에 따른 상사분쟁해결에 관한 소고', 한국중재학회지:중재연구, v.15, no.1, 2005. 3.
  14. 신군재.이주원, '남북한 및 중국 중재제도의 비교연구', 한국중재학회지:중재연구, v.17, no.2, 2007. 8.
  15. 신현윤, 개성공단 투자보장과 분쟁해결절차의 법적 문제점과 개선방안, 연세대학교 법학연구원, 법학연구 20권1호, 2010. 3.
  16. 오현석, 'ICSID 중재판정 취소제도연구', 고려대 박사학위논문, 2015. 12.
  17. 이상훈, '남북경협합의서의 법적 성격에 대한 고찰', 법제, 2003. 12.
  18. 장명봉, '통일 및 관련법제의 쟁점과 전망', 법제연구 제35호, 2008. 12. 20.
  19. 정응기, '개성공단 투자분쟁 해결', 통일법제 관계부처 공동세미나 발제문, 2018. 12. 13.
  20. 최석범 외 4인, '남북상사중재위원회 운영상의 문제점과 활성화방안', 한국중재학회지:중재연구, v.17, no.1, 2007. 3.
  21. 최장호, '남북상사중재위원회 중재규정초안작성상의 문제성과 기본원칙', 한국중재학회지:중재연구, v.14, no.2, 2004. 12.

피인용 문헌

  1. 개성공단 분쟁해결 제도 정비방안 - 남북상사중재제도를 중심으로 vol.29, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2019.29.4.3
  2. 북한의 외국인투자법과 대외경제중재법의 적용범위 vol.30, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2020.30.2.91