Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Mirroring Environment on the Attitude of Client in Counselling

상담 시 거울 환경이 내담자 태도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Mi-So (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Jeonju University) ;
  • Seo, Seon-Yeong (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Jeonju University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Sol (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Jeonju University) ;
  • Jeon, Na-Hyeon (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Jeonju University) ;
  • Jo, A-Hae (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Jeonju University) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Joo (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Jeonju University)
  • 김미소 (전주대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 서선영 (전주대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이은솔 (전주대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 전나현 (전주대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 조아해 (전주대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김은주 (전주대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2019.05.02
  • Accepted : 2019.06.20
  • Published : 2019.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the mirror environment influences the attitude of the client when counselling. A group of 16 experimenters, 16 controls, a group with a mirror environment, and 32 men and women according to the presence or absence of interventional mirror environments in the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in the 'self - alienation' factor of the Authentic Scale(AS) in the experimental group that provided the mirror environment. There was no significant difference in the Semantic Differential Scale(SDS) between the experimental group and the control group. This study was conducted to investigate whether the presence of the mirror environment affects the client 's authenticity. There were significant differences in some of the factors of the Authentic Scale.

본 연구의 목적은 상담 시 거울 환경이 내담자의 태도에 영향을 미치는지 확인하고자 하였다. 20대 남녀 32명을 대상으로 실험군 16명, 대조군 16명을 거울 환경의 유무에 따라 상담을 진행하고 진실성 척도와 의미변별척도를 사용하여 거울 환경이 중재된 실험군과 중재하지 않은 대조군 사이에 차이가 있는지를 확인하였다. 거울 환경을 제공한 실험군에서 진실성 척도의 '자기-소외' 요소가 통계학적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 실험군과 대조군에서 상담 환경을 어떻게 느끼는지를 알아보기 위한 의미변별척도는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 본 연구는 거울 환경의 유무가 내담자의 진실성에 영향을 미치는지를 알아보기 위한 연구로 진실성 척도의 요인 중 일부에서 유의미한 차이가 있었다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_427_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. a mirror used for consultation

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_427_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. intervention situation

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_427_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. intervention environment

Table 1. Comparison of AS between experimental and control group

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_427_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparison of SDS between experimental and control group

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_427_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. I. S. Ku, M. Y. Jung. E. Y. Yoo. J. H. Park. J. S. Lee & H. S. Lee. (2015). Development of Competency Indicators for Korean Occupational Therapists (K-CIOT). The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 23(1), 137-149. doi:10.14519/jksot.2015.23
  2. H. S. Na. Y. D. Kwon & J. W. Noh. (2013). Development of Physician Coaching Model for Improvement of Patient-doctor Communication. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(2), 331-340. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.02.331
  3. S. J. Oh. (2012). A Study on the Integration of Speaking and Writing in the Communication Education: Focused on Developing a Teaching Model by Using Interview in University Classes. Korean Literary theory and Criticism, 16(2), 353-374.
  4. C. S. Song. (2012). Current Trends and Future-oriented View of Clinical Measurement Used by Neurological Occupational Therapist. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 13(11), 5229-5237. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.11.5229
  5. C. Dedding. M. Cardol. I. C. J. M. Eyssen. J. Dekker & A. Beelen. (2004). Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A Client-centred Outcome Measurement. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 660-667. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr746oa
  6. D. S. Janowsky. A. Kraft. P. Clopton & L. Huey. (1984). Relationships of Mood and Interpersonal Perceptions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 25, 546-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-440X(84)90035-X
  7. A. Ziemelis. (1974). Effects of Client Preference and Expectancy upon the Initial Interview. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 21, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036067
  8. J. S. Hong & N. W. Jung. (2013). A Critical Review of Studies on the Counselor's Authenticity. Korean Journal Of Counseling And Psychotherapy, 25(3), 371-395.
  9. M. K. Kim. (2004). The Truthfulness of the Counselor in Human-centered Counseling. Student Life Studies, 9, 99-113.
  10. B. Mullen & J. Suls. (1982). "Know Thyself" : Stressful Life Changes and Ameliorative Effect of Private Self-consciousness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90080-4
  11. M. C. Fejfar & R. H. Hoyle. (2000). Effect of Private Self-awareness on Negative Affect and Self-referent Attribution: A Quantitative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_02
  12. H. S. Lee & H. C. Shin. (2011). The Influence of Authenticity on Subjective Well-being: Mediating Effects of Basic Psychological Needs. Korean Journal of Counseling, 12(5), 1561-1577. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.12.5.201110.1561
  13. C. S. Lee. (1996). A Case Study on Secondary School Students' Attitude towards Technology and Technology Textbooks through Semantic Differential Method. The Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Education, 21(2), 41-55.
  14. E. Y. Beak & Y. J. Kim. (2013). An Analysis of Leisure Sports Image Using Semantic Differential Scale in University Students. The Korea Journal of Sports Science, 22(3), 203-213.
  15. Y. J. Lee. (1989). A Search for the Korean Semantic Differential Scales. The Hanyang Journal of Economic Studies, 10(2), 241-277.
  16. S. E. Choi. (2016). Impacts of interviewer'attitude and mirror on amount and accuracy of interviewee'statement. Master's thesis. Graduate School of Korea University, Seoul.