디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.43-49
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업수명주기별 연구개발투자가 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구 -중국 중소상장기업(SME)을 중심으로-

An Empirical Study on the Effect of R&D Investment on Business Performance by Life Cycle -Focus on China's Small and Medium-sized Enterprises(SME)-

  • 투고 : 2019.04.19
  • 심사 : 2019.06.20
  • 발행 : 2019.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 중국기업의 기업수명주기를 성장기, 성숙기, 쇠퇴기 등 3단계로 구분하여 2011년부터 2017년까지 중국 중소상장기업(SME) 3,750개를 대상으로 공시데이터를 활용하여 기업수명주기별 연구개발투자강도(매출액 대비 연구개발비 총액)가 경영성과(총자산이익률)에 미치는 영향에 대해 실증 분석하였다. 분석결과, 연구개발투자강도(RDS)과 차기(t년도)의 기업 경영성과(ROA)에 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었고 기업수명주기에 따라 연구개발투자가 기업의 경영성과에 다르게 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구의 실증결과는 기업의 연구개발투자와 관련한 전략적 의사결정을 할 때 산업특성 및 기업특성을 고려하여 연구개발투자와 관련한 지출 규모, 자원을 투입 시간 등을 결정하는데 있어서 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.

The study divided the life cycle of Chinese companies into three stages from 2011 to 2017, 3,750 small and medium-sized enterprises(SME) used disclosure data to analyze the intensity of R&D investment by company life cycle. The analysis showed that the impact of wealth(ROA) on the performance of R&D investment(RDS) and the next(t) business performance, and research and development investments had a different impact on the company's performance depending on the life cycle of the company. The results of this study are expected to help determine the amount of expenditure related to R&D investment and the time of input of resources in consideration of industrial characteristics and corporate characteristics when making strategic decisions related to R&D investment of companies.

키워드

Table 1. Sample Selection

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_43_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Results of RDS & ROA

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_43_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Results of Growing Period(A) & ROA

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_43_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Results of Maturity Period(A) & ROA

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_43_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Results of Decline Period(A) & ROA

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_43_t0005.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. D. M. Li, J. C. Wei & P. Mckiernan. (2015). Government Support and Firm Innovation Performance. Chinese Management Studies, 9(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-01-2015-0018
  2. T. Jiang & B. S. Zhang. (2019). R&D Investment, Ownership Structure and Corporate Growth, Financial Theory & Practice, 4(0), 102-109.
  3. N. H. Kyung & L. S. Cheol. (2017). A Study on Corporate Support Service Convergence Factors that Influence Corporate Performance : Targeting Corporations in Sejong City and Chungnam, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(5), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.5.193
  4. T. H. Clausen. (2009). Do Subsidies Have Positive Impacts on R&D and Innovation Activities at the Firm Level. Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 20(4), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004
  5. S. H. Baek & H. K. Lee. (2019). Effects of Interdisciplinary R&D on Technology Commercialization, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.1.028
  6. A. N. Link & J. T. Scott. (2009). Private Investor Participation and Commercialization Rates for Government-Sponsored Research and Development : Would a Prediction Market Improve the Performance of the SBIR Program. Economics, 76(302), 264-281.
  7. X. H. Qi, W. Wang & Z. Y. Wu. (2016). Research on the Relationship Between R&D Investment and Corporate Performance Regulated by Executive Incentive, Science & Technology progress and Policy, 15(0), 76-82.
  8. D. M. Zeng, R. R. Su & J. Y. Wen. (2015). R&D Investment and Firm Innovation Performance-A Study on the Mediating Role of R&D Team's Network Structure, Science and Technology Management Research, 18(0), 71-77.
  9. S. T. Howell. (2017). Financing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants, American Economic Review, 107(4), 1136-1164. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150808
  10. S. Y. Chen. (2014). Research on SMEs Innovation's Risk ad Performance-The Example of Textile Enterprises. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.
  11. J. H. Anthony & K. Ramesh. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices. Journal of accounting and economics, 3(1), 114-122.
  12. V. Dickinson. (2006). Future profitability and the role of firm life cycle, Journal of Fisher School of Accounting, 2(0), 56-72.
  13. L. X. Liang, Y. Jin & N. Zhao. (2010). Study on the Relationship between R&D and Enterprise Performance Based on Enterprise Life Cycle: Empirical Research in Listed Firms, Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 12(0), 11-18.
  14. A. Flynn A, D. M. Mckevitt & P. Davis. (2013). The impact of size on small and medium-sized enterprise public sector tendering. International Small Business Journal, 33(4), 1-19.
  15. R. Angel, U. Vasque & B. G. Andres. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovatio n : Empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy. 45(1), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006
  16. K. Kang & H. Park. (2012) Influence of Government R&D Support and Inter-firm Collaborations on Innovation in Korean Biotechnology SMEs, Technocratic, 32(1), 1345-1369.
  17. K. Y. Lee, S. J. Woo & B. B. Ki. (2015). An Empirical Study on SME's Financing Gap and Its Implication on the Reallocation of Government-sponsored Financing Resources, Journal of Korean Economic Development, 21(2), 91-118.
  18. C. S. Park, C. Y. Im & D. W. Lee. (2016). Evaluating SME's Innovation Capability and Analyzing SME Innovation Policy VII, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Sejong.