DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effectiveness of continuous hypertonic saline infusion with an automated infusion pump for decompressive neuroplasty: a randomized clinical trial

  • Lee, Ho-Jin (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jaewoo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Park, Yeon wook (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Gil, Ho Young (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Eunjoo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Nahm, Francis Sahngun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Pyung Bok (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2019.01.31
  • Accepted : 2019.03.26
  • Published : 2019.07.01

Abstract

Background: Hypertonic saline (HS) injections for decompressive neuroplasty (DN) can cause pain. We assessed whether a continuous infusion of HS through an infusion pump would reduce injection-related pain compared with repeated bolus administrations. Methods: Fifty patients scheduled for DN were randomized to either the bolus injection or the continuous infusion group. After appropriately placing the epidural catheter, 4 mL of 5% NaCl was injected as four boluses of 1 mL each at 15-minute intervals or infused over 1 hour using an infusion pump. The severity of pain induced by HS injection, as measured by the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), was the primary outcome. The severity of low back or lower extremity pain, as measured by the 11-point NRS and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 3 months following the procedure, was the secondary outcome. Results: Data from 21 patients in the bolus group and 23 in the continuous infusion group were analyzed. No statistically significant difference in injection-related pain was identified between the two groups during the initial HS administration (P = 0.846). However, there was a statistically significant reduction in injection-related pain in the continuous infusion group compared to the bolus injection group from the second assessment onwards (P = 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). No significant between-group differences in the NRS and ODI scores 3 months post-procedure were noted (P = 0.614 and 0.949, respectively). Conclusions: Our study suggests that administering HS through a continuous infusion is a useful modality for reducing HS injection-related pain during DN.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee F, Jamison DE, Hurley RW, Cohen SP. Epidural lysis of adhesions. Korean J Pain 2014; 27: 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.3
  2. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC, Petrie JL, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, et al. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L European Study Group. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 855-61. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199604000-00053
  3. Igarashi T, Hirabayashi Y, Seo N, Saitoh K, Fukuda H, Suzuki H. Lysis of adhesions and epidural injection of steroid/local anaesthetic during epiduroscopy potentially alleviate low back and leg pain in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 181-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh201
  4. Robertson JT. Role of peridural fibrosis in the failed back: a review. Eur Spine J 1996; 5(Suppl 1): S2-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298565
  5. Trescot AM, Chopra P, Abdi S, Datta S, Schultz DM. Systematic review of effectiveness and complications of adhesiolysis in the management of chronic spinal pain: an update. Pain Physician 2007; 10: 129-46.
  6. Racz GB, Heavner JE, Trescot A. Percutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions--evidence for safety and efficacy. Pain Pract 2008; 8: 277-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00203.x
  7. Helm Ii S, Benyamin RM, Chopra P, Deer TR, Justiz R. Percutaneous adhesiolysis in the management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome and spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Pain Physician 2012; 15: E435-62.
  8. Waldman SD. Atlas of interventional pain management. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders. 2014, pp 568-76.
  9. Birkenmaier C, Redeker J, Sievers B, Melcher C, Jansson V, Mayer-Wagner S. An evaluation of medications commonly used for epidural neurolysis procedures in a human fibroblast cell culture model. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36: 140-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d41c4
  10. Manchikanti L, Rivera JJ, Pampati V, Damron KS, McManus CD, Brandon DE, et al. One day lumbar epidural adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis in treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind trial. Pain Physician 2004; 7: 177-86.
  11. Erdine S, Talu GK. Precautions during epidural neuroplasty. Pain Pract 2002; 2: 308-14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1533-2500.2002.02038.x
  12. Baraniuk JN, Ali M, Yuta A, Fang SY, Naranch K. Hypertonic saline nasal provocation stimulates nociceptive nerves, substance P release, and glandular mucous exocytosis in normal humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 655-62. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9805081
  13. Leffler AS, Kosek E, Hansson P. Injection of hypertonic saline into musculus infraspinatus resulted in referred pain and sensory disturbances in the ipsilateral upper arm. Eur J Pain 2000; 4: 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1053/eujp.1999.0160
  14. Bennell K, Hodges P, Mellor R, Bexander C, Souvlis T. The nature of anterior knee pain following injection of hypertonic saline into the infrapatellar fat pad. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 116-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00162-1
  15. Choi EJ, Yoo YJ, Lee PB, Kim YC, Lee SC, Moon JY. A retrospective study to evaluate the effect of concentration of hypertonic saline on efficacy and safety of epidural adhesiolysis. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 2021-9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001925
  16. Jankovic D, Peng P. Regional nerve blocks in anesthesia and pain therapy: traditional and ultrasound-guided techniques. Cham, Springer. 2015, pp 655-70.
  17. Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization). Clin Orthop Surg 2014; 6: 103-9. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103
  18. Kim JH, Jung HJ, Nahm FS, Lee PB. Does improvement in epidurography following percutaneous epidural neuroplasty correspond to patient outcome? Pain Pract 2015; 15: 407-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12197
  19. Seo H, inventor; Yoo J, assignee. Piezo-electric actuated infusion pump. Korea patents KR101127126B1. 2012 Mar 21.
  20. Scarfone RJ, Jasani M, Gracely EJ. Pain of local anesthetics: rate of administration and buffering. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31: 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70278-1
  21. Cardoso MM, Carvalho JC. Epidural pressures and spread of 2% lidocaine in the epidural space: influence of volume and speed of injection of the local anesthetic solution. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23: 14-9.
  22. Son WG, Jang M, Yoon J, Lee LY, Lee I. The effect of epidural injection speed on epidural pressure and distribution of solution in anesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014; 41: 526-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12147
  23. Usubiaga JE, Wikinski JA, Usubiaga LE. Epidural pressure and its relation to spread of anesthetic solutions in epidural space. Anesth Analg 1967; 46: 440-6.
  24. Ho KY, Manghnani P. Acute monoplegia after lysis of epidural adhesions: a case report. Pain Pract 2008; 8: 404-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00229.x
  25. Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, Svensson P, Jensen TS. Quantification of local and referred muscle pain in humans after sequential i.m. injections of hypertonic saline. Pain 1997; 69: 111-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03243-5
  26. Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation. Pain Physician 2012; 15: 213-21.