한국해양공학회지 (Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology)

  • 제33권3호
  • /
  • Pages.259-271
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1225-0767(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6715(eISSN)
한국해양공학회 (Korean Society of Ocean Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study on Various Ductile Fracture Models for Marine Structural Steel EH36

  • Park, Sung-Ju (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Kangsu (Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering) ;
  • Cerik, Burak Can (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Choung, Joonmo (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.09
  • 심사 : 2019.05.27
  • 발행 : 2019.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

It is important to obtain reasonable predictions of the extent of the damage during maritime accidents such as ship collisions and groundings. Many fracture models based on different mechanical backgrounds have been proposed and can be used to estimate the extent of damage involving ductile fracture. The goal of this study was to compare the damage extents provided by some selected fracture models. Instead of performing a new series of material constant calibration tests, the fracture test results for the ship building steel EH36 obtained by Park et al. (2019) were used which included specimens with different geometries such as central hole, pure shear, and notched tensile specimens. The test results were compared with seven ductile fracture surfaces: Johnson-Cook, Cockcroft-Latham-Oh, Bai-Wierzbicki, Modified Mohr-Coulomb, Lou-Huh, Maximum shear stress, and Hosford-Coulomb. The linear damage accumulation law was applied to consider the effect of the loading path on each fracture surface. The Swift-Voce combined constitutive model was used to accurately define the flow stress in a large strain region. The reliability of these simulations was verified by the good agreement between the axial tension force elongation relations captured from the tests and simulations without fracture assignment. The material constants corresponding to each fracture surface were calibrated using an optimization technique with the minimized object function of the residual sum of errors between the simulated and predicted stress triaxiality and load angle parameter values to fracture initiation. The reliabilities of the calibrated material constants of B-W, MMC, L-H, and HC were the best, whereas there was a high residual sum of errors in the case of the MMS, C-L-O, and J-C models. The most accurate fracture predictions for the fracture specimens were made by the B-W, MMC, L-H, and HC models.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. , 2004. Standard Test Methods of Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials.
  2. Algarni, M., Choi, Y., Bai, Y., 2017. A Unified Material Model for Multiaxial Ductile Fracture and Extremely Low Cycle Fatigue of Inconel 718. International Journal of Fatigue, 96, 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.033
  3. Bai, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2008. A New Model of Metal Plasticity and Fracture with Pressure and Lode Dependence. International Journal of Plasticity, 24(6), 1071-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004
  4. Bai, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2010. Application of Extended Mohr-Coulomb Criterion to Ductile Fracture. International Journal of Fracture, 161(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9422-8
  5. Bao, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2004. A Comparative Study on Various Ductile Crack Formation Criteria. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 126(3), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1755244.
  6. Bao, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2005, On the Cut-off Value of Negative Triaxiality for Fracture. Engineering of Fracture Mechanics, 72(7), 1049-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.011
  7. Cerik, B.C., Park, B., Park, S.J., Choung, J., 2019a. Simulation of Ship Collision and Grounding Damage Using Hosford-Coulomb Fracture Model for Shell Elements. Ocean Engineering, 173, 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.01.004
  8. Cerik, B.C., Park, B., Park, S.J., Choung, J., 2019b. Modeling, Testing and Calibration of Ductile Crack Formation in Grade DH36 Ship Plates. Marine Structures, 66, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.03.003
  9. Clift, S.E., Hartley, P., Sturgess, C.E.N., Rowe, G.W., 1990. Fracture Prediction in Plastic Deformation Processes. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 32(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C
  10. Cheng, C., Meng, B., Han, J.Q., Wan, M., Wu, X.D., Zhao, R., 2017. A Modified Lou-Huh Model for Characterization of Ductile Fracture of DP590 Sheet. Materials and Design, 118, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.030
  11. Choung, J., Shim, C.S., Kim, K.S., 2011. Plasticity and Fracture Behaviors of Marine Structural Steel, Part III: Experimental Study on Failure Strain. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 25(3), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2011.25.3.053
  12. Cho, S.R., Choi, S.I., Son, S.K., 2015. Dynamic Material Properties of Marine Steels under Impact Loadings. Proceedings of the 2015 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Incheon Korea.
  13. Cockroft, M.G., Latham, D.J., 1968. Ductility and the Workability of Metals. Journal of the Institute of Metals, 96, 33-39.
  14. DNVGL, 2018. Offshore Standards - Metallic Materials. DNVGLOS-B101.
  15. Dunand, M., Mohr, D., 2011. On the Predictive Capabilities of the Shear Modified Gurson and the Modified Mohr-Coulomb Fracture Models over a Wide Range of Stress Triaxialities and Lode Angles. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 59, 1374-1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.006
  16. Erice, B., Roth, C.C., Mohr, D., 2017. Stress-State and Strain-Rate Dependent Ductile Fracture of Dual and Complex Phase Steel. Mechanics of Materials, 116, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.07.020
  17. Gurson, A.L., 1977. Continuum Theory of Ductile Rupture by Void Nucleation and Growth: Part I - Yield Criteria and Flow Rules for Porous Ductile Media. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 99(1), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3443401
  18. Hancock, J.W., Brown, D.K., 1983. On the Role of Strain and Stress State in Ductile Failure. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 31(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(83)90017-0
  19. Johnson, G.R. Cook, W.H., 1985. Fracture Characteristics of Three Metals Subjected to Various Strain, Strain Rates Temperatures and Pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 21(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9
  20. Korgesaar, M., Remes, H., Romanoff, J., 2014. Size Dependent Response of Large Shell Elements under In-plane Tensile Loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51 (21-22), 3752-3761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.07.012
  21. LeRoy, G., Embury, J.D., Edwards, G., Ashby, M.F., 1981, A Model of Ductile Fracture Based on the Nucleation and Growth of Voids. Acta Metallurgica, 29(8), 1509-1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(81)90185-1
  22. Lemaitre, J., 1985. A Continuous Damage Mechanics Model for Ductile Fracture. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 107(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3225775
  23. Li, Y., Luo, M., Gerlach, J., Wierzbicki, T., 2010. Prediction of Shear-induced Fracture in Sheet Metal Forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210(14), 1858-1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.021
  24. Lou, Y., Huh, H., Lim, S., Pack, K., 2012. New Ductile Fracture Criterion for Prediction of Fracture Forming Limit Diagrams of Sheet Metals. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 49(25), 3605-3615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016
  25. McClintock, F.A., 1968., A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35(2), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3601204
  26. Min, D.K., Cho, S.R., 2012. On the Fracture of Polar Class Vessel Structures Subjected to Lateral Impact Loads. Journal of the Society Naval Architects of Korea, 49(4), 281-286. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2012.49.4.281
  27. Mohr, D., Marcadet, S., 2015. Micromechanically-motivated Phenomenological Hosford-coulomb Model for Predicting Ductile Fracture Initiation at Low Stress Triaxialites. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 67-68, 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.024
  28. Oh, S.I., Chen., C.C., Kobayashi, S., 1979. Ductile Fracture in Axisymmetric Extrusion and Drawing-Part 2: Workability in Extrusion and Drawing. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 101(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3439471
  29. Park, N., Huh, H., Nam, J.B., Jung, C.G., 2015. Anisotropy Effect on the Fracture Model of DP980 Sheets Considering the Loading Path. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 16(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-015-0008-3
  30. Park, N., Huh, H., 2016. Modeling of a Ductile Fracture Criterion for Sheet Metal Considering Anisotropy. Transactions of Materials Procssing, 25(2), 91-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5228/KSTP.25.2.91
  31. Pack, K., Mohr, D., 2017. Combined Necking & Fracture Model to Predict Ductile Failure with Shell Finite Elements. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 182, 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.06.025
  32. Park, S.J., Lee, K., Choung, J., Walters, C.L., 2018. Ductile Fracture Prediction of High Tensile Steel EH36 Using New Damage Functions. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2018.1426433
  33. Park, S.J., Lee, K., Cerik B.C., Choung, J., 2019. Ductile Fracture Prediction of EH36 Grade Steel Based on Hosford-Coulomb Model. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1565300
  34. Rice, J.R., Tracey, D.M., 1969. On the Ductile Enlargement of Voids in Triaxial Stress Fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 17(3), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7
  35. Roth, C.C., Mohr, D., 2016. Ductile Fracture Experiments with Locally Proportional Loading Histories. International Journal of Plasticity, 79, 328-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.08.004
  36. Simulia, 2018. Abaqus User Manual.
  37. Tornqvist, R., 2003. Design of Crashworthy Ship Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark.
  38. Tvergaard, V., Needleman, A., 1984. Analysis of the Cup-cone Fracture in a Round Tensile Bar. Acta Metallurgica, 32(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X
  39. Walters, C.L., 2014. Framework for Adjusting for Both Stress Triaxiality and Mesh Size Effect for Failure of Metals in Shell Structures. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 19(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2013.825366
  40. Xinke, X., Pan, H., Bai, Y., Yanshan, L., Lin, C., 2019. Application of the Modified Mohr-Coulomb Fracture Criterion in Predicting the Ballistic Resistance of 2024-T351 Aluminum Alloy Plates Impacted by Blunt Projectiles. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 123, 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.09.015
  41. Xue, L., 2007, Damage Accumulation and Fracture Initiation in Uncracked Ductile Solids Subject to Triaxial Loading. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 44(6), 5163-5181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.026