DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pop-up Chart for Managing CRRT Improves the Quality of CRRT Care

전자의무기록 팝업차트를 활용한 CRRT 관리의 질향상 활동

  • Go, Su-Ryeong (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, An-Na (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Pyo (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Chin, Ho-Jun (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Na, Ki-Young (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Chae, Dong-Wan (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Se-Joong (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 고수령 (분당서울대학교병원 신장내과) ;
  • 이안나 (분당서울대학교병원 신장내과) ;
  • 김기표 (분당서울대학교병원 신장내과) ;
  • 진호준 (분당서울대학교병원 신장내과) ;
  • 나기영 (분당서울대학교병원 신장내과) ;
  • 채동완 (분당서울대학교병원 신장내과) ;
  • 김세중 (분당서울대학교병원 신장내과)
  • Received : 2019.04.30
  • Accepted : 2019.05.20
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The time lag between the decision to initiate continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and its actual initiation remains a major barrier in our intensive care units. We developed a CRRT pop-up chart on EMR for managing CRRT machines. Methods: This study measured time interval between the decision to prepare the CRRT machine and the actual use of the machine before and after using a CRRT pop-up chart. This study conducted a questionnaire of the medical staff to assess the changes in the quality of CRRT preparation. Results: A total of 95 patients on CRRT is analyzed. The time to find an available CRRT machine is decreased by 24.6%. The time to move a CRRT machine to the patient's bedside is decreased by 55.8%. Medical surveys of 44 nurses gave the following results. 1) The time to apprehend machines for 1 to 3 minutes is improved from 29.5% to 81.8%, and the time to apprehend machines over 3 minutes is decreased from 70.5% to 18.2%. 2) The number (6-all) of known machine locations is improved from 22.7% to 63.4%. 3) Interruption of a nurse's work due to telephone calls asking for the possession of movable CRRT equipment also is improved. Scores of 1-4 are improved from 15.9% to 41%. Scores of 5-7 are reduced from 52% to 15.9%. Conclusions: CRRT pop-up chart is shortened the time lag of CRRT machine preparation, reduced the nurse's phone workload and helped to improve the quality of CRRT care.

Keywords

References

  1. Heung M, Bagshaw SM, House AA, Juncos LA, Piazza R, Goldstein SL. CRRT net: a prospective, multi-national, observational study of continuous renal replacement therapy practices. BMC Nephrology. 2017;18(1):222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0650-2
  2. Rewa O, Villeneuve PM, Eurich DT, Stelfox HT, Gibney RT, Hartling L, et al. Quality indicators in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) care in critically ill patients: protocol for a systematic review. Systematic reviews. 2015;30(4):102.
  3. Kee YK, Kim EJ, Park KS, Han SG, Han IM, Yoon CY, et al. The effect of specialized continuous renal replacement therapy team in acute kidney injury patients treatment. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2015;56(3):658-65. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.658
  4. Walcher A, Faubel S, Keniston A, Dennen P. In critically ill patients requiring CRRT, AKI is associated with increased respiratory failure and death versus ESRD. Renal Failure. 2011;33(10):935-42. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2011.615964
  5. Gilbert RW, Caruso DM, Foster KN, Canulla MV, Nelson ML, Gilbert EA. Development of a continuous renal replacement program in critically ill patients. American Journal of Surgery. 2002;184(6): 526-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01056-5
  6. Bellomo R, Mehta R. Acute renal replacement in the intensive care unit: now and tomorrow. New Horizons. 1995;3(4):760-7.
  7. Lee JY, Jin Y, Piao J, Lee SM. Development and evaluation of an automated fall risk assessment system. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016;28(2):175-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzv122
  8. Gagnier JJ, Derosier JM, Maratt JD, Hake ME, Bagian JP. Development, implementation and evaluation of a patient handoff tool to improve safety in orthopaedic surgery. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016;28(3):363-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw031
  9. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, ET Lake, Timothy Cheney. Effects of hospital care environment on patient mortality and nurse outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2008;38(5):223-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA.0000312773.42352.d7
  10. De Becker W. Starting up a continuous renal replacement therapy program on ICU. Contributions to Nephrology. 2007;156:185-90. https://doi.org/10.1159/0000102082
  11. Ovretveit J, Scott T, Rundall TG, Shortell SM, Brommels M. Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007;19(5):259-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm031