Magazine of korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (자연, 터널 그리고 지하공간)

Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (한국터널지하공간학회)
권호 표지

Simplified Failure Mechanism for the Prediction of Tunnel Crown and Excavation Front Displacements

  • Moghaddam, Rozbeh B. (GRL Engineers) ;
  • Kim, Mintae (Texas Tech University)
  • Published : 2019.03.16
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This case study presented a simplified failure mechanism approach used as a preliminary deformation prediction for the Mexico City's metro system expansion. Because of the Mexico City's difficult subsoils, Line 12 project was considered one of the most challenging projects in Mexico. Mexico City's subsurface conditions can be described as a multilayered stratigraphy changing from soft high plastic clays to dense to very dense cemented sands. The Line 12 trajectory crossed all three main geotechnical Zones in Mexico City. Starting from to west of the City, Line 12 was projected to pass through very dense cemented sands corresponding to the Foothills zone changing to the Transition zone and finalizing in the Lake zone. Due to the change in the subsurface conditions, different constructions methods were implemented including the use of TBM (Tunnel Boring Machine), the NATM (New Austrian Tunneling Method), and cut-and-cover using braced Diaphragm walls for the underground section of the project. Preliminary crown and excavation front deformations were determined using a simplified failure mechanism prior to performing finite element modeling and analysis. Results showed corresponding deformations for the crown and the excavation front to be 3.5cm (1.4in) and 6cm (2.4in), respectively. Considering the complexity of Mexico City's difficult subsoil formation, construction method selection becomes a challenge to overcome. The use of a preliminary results in order to have a notion of possible deformations prior to advanced modeling and analysis could be beneficial and helpful to select possible construction procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. American Public Transportation Association (2014). https://www.apta.com/Pages/default.aspx.
  2. Gonzalez, E. T., Holguin, E., & Nunez, J. L. R. (1997). Diseno geotecnico de tuneles. TGC Geotecnia.
  3. Marsal, R. J., Mazari M (1975). The lacustrine clays of the Valley of Mexico. Instituto de Ingenieria Mexico, Vol. 16, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
  4. Rosenblueth, E., & Ovando, E. (1991). Geotechnical lessons learned from Mexico and other recent earthquakes. In Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Dynamics: Saint Louis, Missouri, U.S.A., II, pp. 1799-1819.
  5. Santoyo, E., & Ovando-Shelley, E. (2004). Geotechnical considerations for hardening the subsoil in Mexico City's Metropolitan Cathedral. In Advances in geotechnical engineering: The Skempton conference: Proceedings of a three-day conference on advances in geotechnical engineering, organised by the Institution of Civil Engineers and held at the Royal Geographical Society, London, UK, 29-31 Mar 2004, pp. 1155-1168.
  6. Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transporte (2016). https://www.metro.cdmx.gob.mx/la-red/linea-12-2.
  7. Zeevaert, L. (1983). Foundation engineering for difficult subsoil conditions. Van Nostrand Reinhold (VNR) Company.