DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The EU-South Korea FTA: Which Sector Benefits the Most?

  • Evert, Janik (Graduate School of International Studies Ewha Womans University Seoul) ;
  • Oh, Jinhwan (Graduate School of International Studies Ewha Womans University Seoul)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.19
  • 심사 : 2019.04.20
  • 발행 : 2019.04.30

초록

Purpose - This study empirically analyzes the effects of the European Union-South Korea Free Trade Agreement on Korean exports in major sectors. Design/Methodology - This study is based on the augmented gravity model with a panel data set covering 51 countries between the years 2000 and 2015. Findings - Main findings of the present study is that the agreement has affected the chemical sector the most. Fixed effects estimation predicted a positive trade effect of 38.3%, while Poisson maximum likelihood estimation predicted an impact of 4.75% in the chemical export sector. Regression results for the other sectors only show insignificant effects. Originality/value - The findings imply that the effects of the EU-South Korea free trade agreement on the Korean exports are quite specific compared to the European ones, meaning that the Korean government should focus on sector-specific programs to maximize the welfare benefits of the free trade agreement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams, R., H. Almeida and D. Ferreira (2009), "Understanding the Relationship Between Founder-CEOs and Firm Performance", Journal of Empirical Finance, 16(1), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2008.05.002
  2. Amiti, M. (1999), "Specialization Patterns in Europe', Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 135 (3), 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707385
  3. Anderson, J. E. (1979), "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation", The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116.
  4. Anderson, J. E. and E. van Wincoop (2003), "Gravity with Gravitas: a Solution to the Border Puzzle", American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
  5. Bacchetta, M. (2012), A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis, Geneva, UNCTAD.
  6. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand (2007), "Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade?", Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
  7. Baldwin, R. (2014), "WTO 2.0: Governance of the 21st Century Trade", The Review of International Organizations, 9(2), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9186-4
  8. Baldwin, R. and D. Taglioni (2007), "Trade Effects of the Euro: A Comparison of Estimators", Journal of Economic Integration, 22(4), 780-818. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2007.22.4.780
  9. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985), "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474-481. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976
  10. Cooper, W. H. (2011), EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement and Its Implications for the United States (Webpage). Available from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41534.pdf
  11. Endoh, M. (1999), "Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960-1994", Applied Economics, 31(2), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499324435
  12. European Commission (2018), The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (Webpage). Available from http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/south-korea/
  13. Forizs, V. and L. Nilsson (2017), "Trade Effects of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of Expected and Observed Outcomes", The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 18(1), 14-30.
  14. Frankel, J. A., E. Stein and S. J. Wei (1997), Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System, Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
  15. Gashi, P., M. Hisarciklilar and G. Pugh (2017), "Kosovo-EU Trade Relations: a Dynamic Panel Poisson Approach", Applied Economics, 49(27), 2642-2654. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1245836
  16. Gavin, B. and A. Sindzingre (2009), "EU Trade Relations with Emerging Asia. Identifying the Issues", Asia Europe Journal, 7(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-008-0220-0
  17. Hatab, A. A., E. Romstad and X. Huo (2010), "Determinants of Egyptian Agricultural Exports: A Gravity model approach", Modern Economy, 1(3), 134-143 https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2010.13015
  18. Head, K., T. Mayer and J. Ries (2010), "The Erosion of Colonial Trade Linkages after Independence', Journal of international Economics, 81(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002
  19. Isard, W., D. F. Bramhall and G. A. Carrothers (1971), Methods of Regional Analysis: an Introduction to Regional Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  20. Jayasinghe, S. and R. Sarker (2008), "Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Trade in Agrifood Products: Evidence from Gravity Modeling Using Disaggregated Data", Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00392.x
  21. Juust, M., P. Vahter and U. Varblane (2017), The Trade Effects of the EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement in the Automotive Industry, Tartu, Estonia: University of Tartu Faculty of Social Sciences School of Economics and Business Administration.
  22. Kelly, R. E. (2011), "Korea-European Union relations. Beyond the FTA?", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 12(1), 101-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcr020
  23. Kepaptsoglou, K., M. G. Karlaftis and D. Tsamboulas (2010), "The Gravity Model Specification for Modeling International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreement Effects: A 10-year Review of Empirical Studies", The Open Economics Journal, 3(1), 1-13 https://doi.org/10.2174/1874919401003010001
  24. Kose, M. A. and R. Riezman (2002), "Small Countries and Preferential Trade Agreements: How Severe Is the Innocent Bystander Problem?", Pacific Economic Review, 7(2), 279-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.00022
  25. Magee, C. S. (2003), "Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements: An Empirical Analysis", Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2(1), 1-19 https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1166
  26. Mayer, T. and S. Zignago (2011), "Notes on CEPII's Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database", CEPII Working Paper. Banque De France.
  27. Nichols, A. (2007), "Causal Inference with Observational Data", Stata Journal, 7(4), 507-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0700700403
  28. Rose, A. K. (2004), "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?', American Economic Review, 94(1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282804322970724
  29. Silva, J. S. and S. Tenreyro (2006), "The Log of Gravity", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641
  30. Stangarone, T. (2009), Korea-EU FTA Represents a Challenge for the United States (Webpage). Available from http://keia.org/sites/default/files/publications/09November.pdf
  31. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  32. Yang, S. and I. Martinez-Zarzoso (2014), "A Panel Data Analysis of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects: The Case of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area", China Economic Review, 29(3), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.04.002