DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Internationalization of Brand Biography: Firm Characteristics as Moderators

  • Han, Bang-Wool (Department of International Trade, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Ho (Department of International Trade, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2019.04.10
  • Accepted : 2019.05.20
  • Published : 2019.05.31

Abstract

Purpose - Underdog positioning is often used to evoke a positive attitude when interacting with consumers. However, little research has been conducted on the market competition structure and innovation contexts in which underdog positioning produces the most impact. This research aims to investigate unexplored boundary conditions of underdog positioning and addresses two issues: market structures (oligopoly vs monopolistic competition) and perceived firm innovativeness (PFI). Design/methodology - Two one-way ANOVA designs (market structures: monopolistic competitions vs. oligopoly; perceived frim innovativeness: strong vs. weak) were randomly assigned to 297 graduate and undergraduate students (52 % female) majoring in business. Study 1 examined the effect of underdog positioning on consumer attitudes in the different market structures. Study 2 investigated the relationship between underdog effect and consumer attitudes through viewing conditions that varied in PFI. Findings - Drawing on the results of the study, the authors conclude that underdog positioning is effective to generate more positive consumer attitudes when employed in the market structure of monopolistic competition rather than oligopoly. Moreover, both underdog and top dog positioning are likely to generate more positive consumer attitudes when accompanied with strong PFI than weak PFI. Originality/value -This is the first study to distinguish between monopolistic competition and oligopoly market structures with underdog positioning as well as to demonstrate a positive effect of PFI, regardless of the type of brand narratives.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A5B5A07073309).

References

  1. Aaker, D. (2007), "Innovation: Brand It or Lose It", California Management Review, 50(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166414
  2. Adiele, K. C. (2012), "New Product Development and Consumer Innovative Behaviour: An Empirical Validation Study", European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1(6), 97-109.
  3. Aggarwal, P. (2004), "The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1086/383426
  4. Anderson, S. P., A. De Palma and Y. Nesterov (1995), "Oligopolistic Competition and the Optimal Provision of Products", Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1281-1301.
  5. Brakus, J. J., B. H. Schmitt and L. Zarantonello (2009), "Brand Experience: What Is It? How Is It Measured? Does It Affect Loyalty?", Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.52
  6. Caves, R. E. and M. E. Porter (1978), "Market Structure, Oligopoly, and Stability of Market Shares", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 289-313.
  7. Danneels, E. and E. J. Kleinschmidtb (2001), "Product Innovativeness from the Firm's Perspective: Its Dimensions and Their Relation with Project Selection and Performance", Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 18(6), 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1860357
  8. Goldschmied, N. P. and J. A. Vandello (2012), "The Future Is Bright: The Underdog Label, Availability, and Optimism", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.637726
  9. Han, Bang-Wool, Min-Ho Kim and Jae-Hoon Lee (2018), "Exploring Consumer Attitudes and Purchasing Intentions of Cross-Border Online Shopping in Korea", Journal of Korea Trade, 22(2), 86-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-10-2017-0093
  10. Henard, D. H. and P. A. Dacin (2010), "Reputation for Product Innovation: Its Impact on Consumers", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00719.x
  11. Holt, D. B. and C. J. Thompson (2004), "Man-of-Action Heroes: The Pursuit of Heroic Masculinity in Everyday Consumption", Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1086/422120
  12. Im, S. and J. P. Workman Jr. (2004), "Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms", Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.114.27788
  13. Jun, S., J. Sung, J. W. Gentry and L. P. McGinnis (2015), "Effects of Underdog (vs. Top Dog) Positioning Advertising", International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 495-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.996199
  14. Kao, D. T. (2019), "The Impact of Envy on Brand Preference: Brand Storytelling and Psychological Distance as Moderators", Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(4), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-2004
  15. Kao, D. T., P. H. Wu and A. P. I. Yu (2017), "The Impact of Construal Level on Brand Preferences: Ad Metaphors and Brand Biography as Moderators", Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(1), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.10.001
  16. Kaufman, B. (2003), "Stories That Sell, Stories That Tell", Journal of Business Strategy, 24(2), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660310508155
  17. Kim, J., S. T. Allison, D. Eylon, G. R. Goethals, M. J. Markus, S. M. Hindle and H. A. McGuire (2008), "Rooting for (and Then Abandoning) the Underdog", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2550-2573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00403.x
  18. Kim, J., K. H. Kim, T. C. Garrett and H. Jung (2015), "The Contributions of Firm Innovativeness to Customer Value in Purchasing Behavior", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(2), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12173
  19. Kirmani, A., R. W. Hamilton, D. V. Thompson and S. Lantzy (2017), "Doing Well versus Doing Good: The Differential Effect of Underdog Positioning on Moral and Competent Service Providers", Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0369
  20. Kulviwat, S., G. C. Bruner II and O. Al Shuridah (2009), "The Role of Social Influence on Adoption of High Tech Innovations: The Moderating Effect of Public/Private Consumption", Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 706-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.04.014
  21. Kunz, W., B. Schmitt and A. Meyer (2011), "How Does Perceived Firm Innovativeness Affect the Consumer?", Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 816-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.005
  22. Legendre, T., R. Warnick and M. Baker (2018), "The Support of Local Underdogs: System Justification Theory Perspectives", Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 59(3), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965517748773
  23. Li, H., W. Dou, G. Wang and N. Zhou (2008), "The Effect of Agency Creativity on Campaign Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Market Conditions", Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370409
  24. Li, Y. and M. Zhao (2018), "Must the Underdog Win? The Moderation Effect of Product Type in the Underdog Effect of Brand Stories", Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12326
  25. Lundqvist, A., V. Liljander, J. Gummerus and A. Van Riel (2013), "The Impact of Storytelling on the Consumer Brand Experience: The Case of a Firm-originated Story", Journal of Brand Management, 20(4), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.15
  26. Mazzeo, M. J. (2002), "Product Choice and Oligopoly Market Structure", RAND Journal of Economics, 221-242.
  27. McGinnis, L. P., T. Gao, S. Jun and J. Gentry (2017), "Motivational Bases for Consumers' Underdog Affection in Commerce", Journal of Service Management, 28(3), 563-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-02-2016-0052
  28. McGinnis, L. P. and J. W. Gentry (2009), "Underdog Consumption: An Exploration into Meanings and Motives", Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.026
  29. Mol, M. J. and J. Birkinshaw (2009), "The Sources of Management Innovation: When Firms Introduce New Management Practices", Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269-1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
  30. Moreau, C. P. and D. W. Dahl (2005), "Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers' Creativity", Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1086/429597
  31. Nagar, K. (2017), "Support for the Underdog Brand Biography: Effects on Consumer Attitude and Behavior", Journal of Marketing Communications, 1-17.
  32. Ozretic-Dosen, D., V. Skare and Z. Krupka (2007), "Assessments of Country of Origin and Brand Cues in Evaluating a Croatian, Western and Eastern European Food Product", Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.011
  33. Paharia, N., J. Avery and A. Keinan (2014), "Positioning Brands Against Large Competitors to Increase Sales", Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0438
  34. Paharia, N., A. Keinan, J. Avery and J. B. Schor (2010), "The Underdog Effect: The Marketing of Disadvantage and Determination through Brand Biography", Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1086/656219
  35. Schembri, S., B. Merrilees and S. Kristiansen (2010), "Brand Consumption and Narrative of the Self", Psychology & Marketing, 27(6), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20348
  36. Shams, R., F. Alpert and M. Brown (2015), "Consumer Perceived Brand Innovativeness: Conceptualization and Operationalization", European Journal of Marketing, 49(9/10), 1589-1615. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-05-2013-0240
  37. Shim, Hyae-Chong (2017), "Effect of Government R&D Programs on Innovation by Export Manufacturing Firms", The Korea International Trade Research Institute, 13(2), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.13.2.201704.37
  38. Shirai, M. (2017), "Underdog Effects: The Role of Consumption Domain and Retail Crowding", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(5), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-07-2016-1872
  39. Shonesy, L. and R. D. Gulbro (1998), "Small Business Success: A Review of the Literature", An Official Journal of the Academy of Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 32.
  40. Simpson, M., J. Padmore, N. Taylor and J. F. Hughes (2006), "Marketing in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises", International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(6), 361-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550610710153
  41. Smith, R. E., S. B. MacKenzie, X. Yang, L. M. Buchholz and W. K. Darley (2007), "Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising", Marketing Science, 26(6), 819-833. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0272
  42. Srinivasan, R., G. L. Lilien and A. Rangaswamy (2002), "Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business", Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.3.47.18508
  43. Sudhir, K. (2001), "Competitive Pricing Behavior in the Auto Market: A Structural Analysis", Marketing Science, 20(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.20.1.42.10196
  44. Thisse, J. F. and P. Ushchev (2018), "Monopolistic Competition without Apology", Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, 1, 93.
  45. Woodside, A. G., S. Sood and K. E. Miller (2008), "When Consumers and Brands Talk: Storytelling Theory and Research in Psychology and Marketing", Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 97-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20203