Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Empirical Study on Trade Claim Management from a Relational Perspective

  • Yu, Cheon (Department of International Commerce, Finance, and Investment, KyungHee University)
  • Received : 2019.08.09
  • Accepted : 2019.10.20
  • Published : 2019.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - This study is designed to provide new insights on trade claim management by typifying trade claims from a relational perspective, which defines trade as an organic combination that exchanges relationships based on a mutual goal instead of conflicts between obligations and rights of the contracting parties. Design/methodology - This is a phenomenological study that aims to typify trade claims based on a relational perspective and extract implications for trade claim management. The research procedures of this study are as follows. First, international commercial dispute cases applying the CISG are collected. Second, the cases collected are quantified through content analysis. The variables for quantification are developed based on a relationship perspective. Third, cluster analysis is conducted on coded data to typify cases. And finally, this study compares the characteristics of each type using analysis of variance and suggests implications for the strategic management of trade claims from a relational perspective. Findings - Results show that trade claims are divided into four clusters, depending on whether flexibility is accepted or not and which party violates mutuality. There is also a difference between the claimant and the cause of the claim, according to the cluster. Based on the results, this study suggests that the buyer and the seller should employ different strategies depending on the type of trade claim and presents proposals for strategic claim management. Originality/value - Firstly, this study extends the theoretical discussion on trade claims by applying relational contract theory. Prior studies on trade claims have been primarily based on traditional contract theory. The second is to analyze trade claims quantitatively. Prior case studies on trade claims have mainly relied on qualitative research. Finally, the study contributes to international commercial practice by typifying trade claims and presenting options for strategic management.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, J. C. and J. A. Narus (1984), "A Model of the Distributor's Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships", The Journal of Marketing, 48(4), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251511
  2. Aykol, B. and L. C. Leonidou (2018), "Exporter-importer Business Relationships: Past Empirical Research and Future Directions", International Business Review, 27(5), 1007-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.03.001
  3. Bello, D. C., C. Chelariu and L. Zhang (2003), "The Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Relationalism in Export Distribution Channels", Journal of Business Research, 56(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00215-6
  4. Bodlaj, M., H. Povse and I. Vida (2017), "Cross-border Relational Exchange in SMEs: The Impact of Flexibility-based Trust on Export Performance", Journal of East European Management Studies, 22(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2017-2-199
  5. Choi, Rack-In (2017), "A Study on Effective Trade Claims Solutions through Commercial Arbitration System", Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 22(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2017.22.01.099
  6. Chumpitaz, C. R. and N. G. Paparoidamis (2007), "Service Quality, Relationship Satisfaction, Trust, Commitment and Business-to-business Loyalty", European Journal of Marketing, 41(7/8), 836-867. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710752429
  7. Dalton, C. (1985), "An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine", The Yale Law Journal, 94(5), 997-1114. https://doi.org/10.2307/796151
  8. Dwyer, F. R., P. H. Schurr and S. Oh (1987), "Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships", The Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251126
  9. Feiman, J. M. (1993), "Relational Contract and Default Rules", Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 3, 43-58.
  10. Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson and R. L. Tatham (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.), Uppersaddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  11. Heo, Kwang-Uk (2005), "Force Majeure and Hardship: Focusing on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts", Journal of Korea Port Economics, 21(3), 219-238.
  12. Holsti, O. R. (1969), Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (2nd ed.), Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  13. Hong, Sung-Kyu and Yong-Il Kim (2013), "The Rules of Law for the Hardship in the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts", The International Commerce and Law Review, 57, 3-34.
  14. Hong, Chang-Ki (2007), "A Study on Flexible Trade Business Strategy According to the Change in International Trade Environment", Journal of Korea Culture Industry, 7(1), 197-217.
  15. Ivens, B. S. (2005), "Flexibility in Industrial Service Relationships: The Construct, Antecedents, and Performance Outcomes", Industrial Marketing Management, 34(6), 566-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.10.007
  16. Jung, Hong-Joo (1999), International Trade and Investment, Seoul: Moonyoungsa.
  17. Jung, Hong-Joo, Heui-Chan Noh, Kyung-Jin Choi and Ki-Hyuk Kim (2005), "A Study on the Risk Management of International Trade Risk", The Journal of Maritime Business, (6), 121-137.
  18. Jung, Hong-Joo, Soo-Nam Sung and Yoo-Mi Choi (2012), "Research Trend and Future Research Area on Risk Management in Foreign Trade", Korea Trade Review, 37(3), 69-109.
  19. Kaufmann, P. J. and R. P. Dant (1992), "The Dimensions of Commercial Exchange", Marketing Letters, 3(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993996
  20. Kassarjian, H. H. (1977), "Content Analysis in Consumer Research", Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1086/208674
  21. Kim, Sang-Ho (2003), "Arbitration Agreement and Promotion of Commercial Dispute Settlement", Journal of International Trade Studies, 9(1), 25-48.
  22. Kim, Yong-Il and Kwang-So Park (2011), "A Study on the Risk Management arising from Diversification of International Commercial Transactions1", Korea Trade Review, 36(1), 325-347.
  23. Lambe, R. P., R. Saunders, C. Gibson, J. Hollandt and E. Tegeler (2000), "A CCPR International Comparison of Spectral Radiance Measurements in the Air-ultraviolet", Metrologia, 37(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/37/1/6
  24. Leonidou, L. C., C. S. Katsikeas and J. Hadjimarcou (2002), "Executive Insights: Building Successful Export Business Relationships: A Behavioral Perspective", Journal of International Marketing, 10(3), 96-115. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.10.3.96.19543
  25. Leonidou, L. C., S. Samiee, B. Aykol and M. A. Talias (2014), "Antecedents and Outcomes of Exporter-importer Relationship Quality: Synthesis, Meta-analysis, and Directions for Further Research", Journal of International Marketing, 22(2), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.13.0129
  26. Macneil, I. R. (1980), The New Social Contract: An Inquiry Into Modem Contractual Relations, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  27. Macneil, I. R. (2000), "Contracting Worlds and Essential Contract Theory", Social & Legal Studies, 9(3), 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900307
  28. Nevin, J. R. (1995), "Relationship Marketing and Distribution Channels: Exploring Fundamental Issues", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300413
  29. Oh, Won-Seok (2001), "A Study on the Usefulness of the 'Hardship Provisions of UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts", Korea International Commerce Review, 16(1), 59-84.
  30. Pak, Myung-Sup and Nak-Hyun Han (2006), "A Study on Risk Management of Contract for the International Sale of Goods", Korea Trade Review, 31(4), 201-222.
  31. Park, Chong-Suk (2013), "A Study on the Prevention of International Business Claims", The Journal of Social Science, 12, 81-92.
  32. Park, Ki-Ju (2015), "A Study on the Relational Characteristics of Financial Transaction Contract", Korean Journal of Banking and Financial Law, 8(1), 83-110.
  33. Rajamma, R. K., M. A. Zolfagharian and L. E. Pelton (2011), "Dimensions and Outcomes of B2B Relational Exchange: A Meta-analysis", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(2), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621111112285
  34. Riff, D., S. Lacy and F. Fico (2014), Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research (3rd ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
  35. Seo, Jung-Doo (2011), "A Comparison on Critical Point of Transfer of Risks and Costs at the 11 Incoterms® 2010 Rules", Journal of International Trade and Insurance, 12(2), 75-95.
  36. Shin, Koon-Jae (2007), "An Empirical Study on the Relationship between the Characteristics of Firms and Contracts and the Experience of Claims", Korea Trade Review, 32(5), 155-178.
  37. Simon, H. A. (1972), "Theories of Bounded Rationality", Decision and organization, 1(1), 161-176.
  38. Skarmeas, D. A. and C. S. Katsikeas (2001), "Drivers of Superior Importer Performance in Cross-cultural Supplier-Reseller Relationships", Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00144-9
  39. Styles, C., P. G. Patterson and F. Ahmed (2008), "A Relational Model of Export Performance", Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 880-900. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400385
  40. Weber, R. P. (1990), Basic Content Analysis, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  41. Williston, S. (1921), "Freedom of Contract", The Cornell Law Quarterly, 6(4), 365-380.
  42. Woo, Kwang-Myung (2013), "Interpretation Problem with Application of Incoterms in Arbitral Awards of the International Chamber of Commerce", Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 9(7), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.9.7.201312.39
  43. Yu, Byoung-Yook (2012), "A Study on the Arbitration System and Commercial Disputes between Korea and Malaysia", Journal of International Trade and Insurance, 13(2), 251-278.
  44. Yu, Cheon (2018), "Analysis of CISG Clauses and China's Decision Cases using Relational Contract Theory: Focusing on the Mutuality-Flexibility Frame", International Commerce and Information Review, 20(4), 289-308.
  45. Yu, Cheon and Yun-Seop Hwang (2018), "A Study on the Obligations of Seller and Buyer in the Relational Perspective", Korea International Commerce Review, 33(4), 27-44.