무역학회지 (Korea Trade Review)

한국무역학회 (Korea Trade Research Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국제물품매매계약에 있어서 국제규범들의 통일화에 관한 연구

A Study on the Unification of International Regulations in Contracts for International Sale of Goods

  • 박성호 (계명대학교 경제통상학부)
  • Park, Sung-Ho (Faculty of Economics & Commerce, Keimyung University)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.30
  • 심사 : 2019.12.12
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

At present, there are various standards used as the governing law of contracts for establishing, implementing, and resolving disputes between the parties to international sales contracts, called "Forum Shopping." Uncertainty and increased transaction costs, which may arise from these various norms, may hinder the activation of international commerce. This study examines the process of enacting and examining various international unification norms that have emerged through international organizations to eliminate trade barriers caused by choice of governing law concerning parties involved in the international sale of goods. Issues regarding the positive and negative perspectives are discussed to identify obstacles to international unification norms. In particular, by comparing and analyzing the differences between the regulations of the CISG and PICC, the representative international unification norms on international sales contracts, the possibility of unification of the norms on international sales contracts are reviewed. Direction for the establishment of a single international regulation is presented for reducing the transaction costs and uncertainties in the international sale of goods.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by the Bisa Research Grant of Keimyung University in 2017.

참고문헌

  1. Atiyah, P. S., J. N. Adams, H. L. MacQueen (2005), The Sale of Goods (11th ed.), London: Pearson.
  2. Bae, Jung-Han (2006), "A Study on the Application of Forum Non Conveniens in American Law - Focused on the International Letter of Credit Transactions", Korea Trade Review, 31(3), 223-246.
  3. Carbonara, Emanuela and F. Parisi (2007), "The Paradox of Legal Harmonization", Public Choice, 132(3/4), 367-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9162-0
  4. Carr, I. (2005), International Trade Law (3rd ed.), London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.
  5. Dalhuisen, J. H. (2016), "The New Lex Mercatoria: An Emerging Challenge to Legal Systems in Cross-Border Transactions", Caribbean Academy of Law and Court Administration (CALCA Presentation Oct 2016). Available from https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=710087064097088109078115010064087122015017095012001064108083016002086015024123094093101099062003019016045101086116096097002017007087059020059076078069029007113068031021076024027087124076021075096115123072095065010127101006066077000000022076027125000&EXT=pdf
  6. Dennis, Michael J. (2014), "Modernizing and Harmonizing International Contract Law: the CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles continue to provide the best way forward", Unif. L. Rev., 19, 114-151. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unu003
  7. Efrat, Asif (2016), "Promoting Trade through Private Law: Explaining International Legal Harmonization", Rev. of Int'l Organizations, 11(3), 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9231-y
  8. European Parliament, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-connected-digital-single-market/ file-common-european-sales-law, 2019.11.28.).
  9. Garro, A. M. (1995), "The Gap-Filling Role of the UNIDROIT Principles and the CISG", Tul. L. Rev., 69, 1149-1190.
  10. Honnold, J. O. (1982), Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention, London: Kluwer Law & Taxations Publishers.
  11. Honnold, J. O. (1991), Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention (2nd ed.), London: Kluwer Law & Taxation Publishers.
  12. Jung, Jae-Woo and Kil-Nam Lee (2016), "The Development and Application of Lex Mercatoria in the international commercial transaction : Focus on CISG and PICC Principles", Korea Trade Review, 41(5), 11-39.
  13. Kim, Ji-Suck (2011), "A Study on the Principles of Change of Circumstances under the International Contract Regime", Journal of Law and Politics Research, 11(3), 1167-1193.
  14. Kim, Son-Guk (2009), "CISG-Reviewing from the Comparative Contract Law", Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 18(1), 29-47.
  15. Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://www.mofa.go.kr/www/wpge/m_3830/contents.do (2019.09.20.).
  16. Kruisinga, S. A. (2014), "Contracts for the International Sale of Goods", The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, 2, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.5553/DOQU/221199812014002002003
  17. Lee, Shie-Hwan (2002), New International Trade Contracts, Seoul: ShinYangSa.
  18. Lim, Hyung-Taek (2008), "Kapitel 4 in der PECL: Gultigkeit", Ilkam Law Review, 13, 205-280.
  19. Meyer, Olaf (2014), "Divergences between Success-Scarcity and Theory-Practice", In International Sales Law: A Global Challenge, edited by Larry A. DiMatteo (2014), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 23-36.
  20. O, Seog-Ung (2014), "Die Anwndgungsbereich und das Hauptmerkmal des Geneinsamen Europaischen Kaufrexhts(CESL)", Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 23(2), 29-51.
  21. Oh, Se-Chang (2003), "A Study on the Comparison of the Principles of Interpretation for the Contract for Int'l Sales of Goods on CISG and Unidroit's Principles", Korea Trade Review, 28(2), 343-376.
  22. Oh, Se-Chang and Sung-Ho Park (2014), Principles of Trade Contracts, Seoul: PakYoungSa.
  23. Park, Eun-Young (2018), "The Review of Necessity and Possibility for Rule-Making of Unification of Rules of Private International Law", Dong-A Journal of Int'l Business Transactions Law, 23, 21-39. https://doi.org/10.31839/ibt.2018.12.23.21
  24. Park, Young-Bok and Kwang-Dong Park (2007), A Movement and an Analysis of the Unification in EU Private Law(1) - Contract Law, Korea Legislation Research Institute.
  25. Reich, Arie (1998), "International Sales of Goods Act, 1971: Removing the Old for the New", Legal Studies, 14, 127-178.
  26. Rose, Alan D. (1996), "The Challenges for Uniform Law in the Twenty-First Century", Uniform Law Review, 1, 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/1.1.9
  27. Schmitthoff, C. M. (1987), International Trade Usages, London: Institute of International Business Law and Practice.
  28. Schwenzer, Ingeborg and Pascal Hachem (2009), "The CISG - Successes and Pitfalls", American Journal of Comparative Law, 57, 457-478. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0013
  29. So, Byung-chun (2004), "A Study on Extraterritoriality in the U.S. Practice", The Korean Journal International Law, 49(3), 169-195.
  30. Sohn, Kyung-Han (2016), "Role of lex mercatoria in 21 Century", SungKyunKwan Law Review, 28(3), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2016.28.3.001
  31. Sohn, Kyung-Han and Sung-Kyu Choi (2014), "Application of the Principle of Changes in Circumstances to International Contracts", Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, 23(1), 1-49.
  32. Sweet, A. S. (2006), "The New Lex Mercatoria and Translational Governance", Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), 627-646. Available from https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=fss_papers https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600808311
  33. Treitel, G. H. (2007), The Law of Contract (12th ed.), London: Thomson Reuters Ltd.
  34. UNCITRAL, https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/cisg/status (2019.08.15.).
  35. UNIDROIT, https://www.unidroit.org/about-unidroit/overview (2019.9.28.).