DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exports and Firm Innovation

수출이 기업혁신에 미치는 영향

  • Yim, Jeong-Dae (BK21 PLUS, School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
  • 임정대 (경북대학교 경영학부 BK21플러스)
  • Received : 2019.05.14
  • Accepted : 2019.06.24
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

This study explores the effects of exports on the innovation of Korean firms listed on two Korean stock markets, the Korean Stock Exchange and the Korean Securities Dealers Quotations, between 1999 and 2016. By matching exporting firms to non-exporting ones with propensity score matching, this study accounts for a problem from sample selection bias that may arise from differences in firm-characteristics between the two groups. From the study results, first, both export participation and export volume significantly increase subsequent innovation performance, as measured by the number of patent applications. This result seems to support the "learning by exporting" hypothesis for Korean listed firms. Second, both export participation and export volume narrow innovation scope, proxied as the number of unique International Patent Classification (IPC) codes of the patent applied, the degree to which patents are concentrated in a particular class, and the degree of proximity in the patents. The findings of innovation scope suggest a possible explanation that the learning effect appears in familiar technology fields that firms have previously held, rather than in unfamiliar ones. Third, these results are robust using alternative proxies in the innovation scope, Tobit regressions to consider the non-trivial portion of sample firms with patent applications equal to zeros, and generalized method of moments (GMM) to control for the persistence of innovation measures hearing over years. Finally, the two main results are more pronounced in large firms than in small and medium-sized ones. As for Chaebol firms, however, these results do not appear.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghion, P., A. Bergeaud, M. Lequien and M. Melitz (2017), "The Impact of Exports on Innovation: Theory and Evidence (Unpublished Paper)", Social Science Research Networks, Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3171084
  2. Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt (2005), "Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701-728. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.701
  3. Almeida, P. and B. Kogut (1999), "Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks", Management Science, 45(7), 905-917. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
  4. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991), "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
  5. Atanassov, J. (2016), "Arm's Length Financing and Innovation: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms", Management Science, 62(1), 128-155.
  6. Aw, B. Y. and A. R. Hwang (1995), "Productivity and the Export Market: A Firm-Level Analysis", Journal of Development Economics, 47(2), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(94)00062-H
  7. Aw, B. Y., M. J. Roberts and D. Y. Xu (2008), "R&D Investments, Exporting, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity", American Economic Review, 98(2), 451-456. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.451
  8. Balsmeier, B., L. Fleming and G. Manso (2017), "Independent Boards and Innovation", Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 536-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.12.005
  9. Baltagi, B. H. (2013), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (5th ed.), West Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Clerides, S. K., S. Lach and J. R. Tybout (1998), "Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903-947. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555784
  11. Cui, J. and X. Li (2018), "Innovation, Technology Scope and Firm Productivity (Unpublised Paper)", Social Science Research Networks, Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3270200
  12. Damijan, J. P., C. Kostevc and S. Polanec (2010), "From Innovation to Exporting or Vice Versa?", The World Economy, 33(3), 374-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01260.x
  13. Delgado, M. A., J. C. Farinas and S. Ruano (2002), "Firm Productivity and Export Markets: A Non-Parametric Approach", Journal of International Economics, 57(2), 379-422.
  14. Erstling, J. (2010), "Korea's Patent Policy and Its Impact on Economic Development: A Model for Emerging Countries? (Unpublished Paper)", Mitchell Hamline School of Law Faculty Scholarship. Available from https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=facsch
  15. Fang, V. W., X. Tian and S. Tice (2014), "Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?", Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2085-2125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12187
  16. Fleming, L. (2001), "Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search", Management Science, 47(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
  17. Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1991), "Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth", European Economic Review, 35(3), 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A
  18. Hahn, C. H. (2012), "Learning-by-Exporting, Introduction of New Products, and Product Rationalization: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing", B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 12(1), 1-35.
  19. Hahn, Chin-Hee (2013), "The Effect of Exporting on Plant Productivity and Product Innovation and Firm Heterogeneity: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s", Journal of Korean Economic Analysis, 19(1), 123-168.
  20. Hall, B. H. and R. H. Ziedonis (2001), "The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995", RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 101-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696400
  21. He, J. and X. Tian (2013), "The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: The Case of Innovation", Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 856-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.001
  22. Jaffe, A. B. (1989), "Characterizing the Technological Position of Firms, with Application to Quantifying Technological Opportunity and Research Spillovers", Research Policy, 18(2), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(89)90007-3
  23. Kim, Jung-Ho and Kim, Min-Seo (2014), "Effects of Innovation and Exports on the Performance of Medium-Sized Firms: The Moderating Role of Corporate Type", Korean Management Review, 43(5), 1787.1812.
  24. Kogut, B. (1991), "Country Capabilities and the Permeability of Borders", Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120104
  25. Lanjouw, J. O. and J. Lerner (1996), "Preliminary Injuctive Relief: Theory and Evidence from Patent Litigation (Unpublished Paper)", National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5689, Available from https://www.nber.org/papers/w5689
  26. Lee, Ji-Hye and Byun, Hee-Sub (2016), "Product Market Competition and Corporate Risk-Taking", Asian Review of Financial Research, 29(1), 37-75.
  27. Lin, F. and H. C. Tang (2013), "Exporting and Innovation: Theory and Firm-Level Evidence from the People's Republic of China", International Journal of Applied Economics, 10(2), 52-76.
  28. March, J. G. (1991), "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  29. Salomon, R. M. and J. M. Shaver (2005), "Learning by Exporting: New Insight from Examining Firm Innovation", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14(2), 431-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00047.x
  30. Shin, Youn-Sik and Kim, Min-Choul (2012), "Global Export Negotiation and the Firm Value", Korea Trade Review, 37(2), 105-123.
  31. Sorensen, J. B. and T. E. Stuart (2000), "Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980