DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Analysis on the Arrangement of Rules of the Origin of Steel Products in Korea's Major FTAs

우리나라 주요 FTA의 철강재 원산지 규정 협상에 대한 비교 분석

  • 이승택 (원광대학교 국제통상학부)
  • Received : 2019.09.25
  • Accepted : 2019.10.29
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

As Korea's steel industry exports 38 percent of its total steel production, the future management environment of the steel industry will change depending on the outcome of the FTA negotiations. The overall industrial structure of the domestic steel industry depends on the rules of origin, which are directly linked to the effect of concessionary tariffs. Therefore, negotiations on rules of origin are as important as tariff liberalization for Korea's steel industry. Korea's cold-rolled and plated companies are expected to be negatively affected as the country of origin standards of steel products have not considered the steel production processes in Korea. In future FTA talks, the country of origin rules should be agreed on a change of tariff classification basis. This result would secure a stable export market through increased predictability of steelmakers and reduce the risk of increased costs of oil and intangible products. In addition, the government should consider the structure of domestic supply and demand so that it does not impose constraints on the change of tariff classification. Finally, participants in the negotiations should consider the opinions of the domestic steel industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Anson, J., O. Cadot, A. Estevadeordal, J. de Melo, A. Suwa-Eisenmann, and B.Tumurchudur (2005) "Rules of Origin in North-South Preferential Trading Arrangements with an Application to NAFTA", Review of International Economics, Vol. 13, pp.45-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2005.00491.x
  2. Carrere, C. and J. de Melo (2004) "Are Different Rules of Origin Equally Costly?: Evidence from NAFTA", CEPR Working Paper,
  3. Cadot, O., J. de Melo and B. Tumurchudur (2006) "Product Specific Rules of Origin in EU and US Preferential Trading Arrangements: An Assessment", World Trade Review.
  4. Cheong In-Kyo (2005) Empirical assessment of Korea's FTA rules of origin, Korea Economic Research Institute.
  5. Cho Mee-Jin and Ahn Kyung-Ae (2011) "The Rules of Origin in Korean FTAs and the Analysis on the Domestic Firms' Use of FTAs", Korea trade review, 36(3), pp.83-105.
  6. Choi Won-Mok (2011) "How to Integrate Cost-Generating FTAs-Cost and Benefit Approach", International Trade Law, 97, pp.93-153.
  7. E. Ivan Kingston, "A Comparative Study of Rules of Origin in International Trade", the Economics of Rules of Origin, The University of Michigan Press, pp.9-10.
  8. Estevadeordal, A (2000) "Negotiating Preferential Market Access: The Case of the North American Free Trade Agreement", Journal of World Trade, No. 4,
  9. Hokeman Bernard and Michel Kostecki (2001) "The Political Economy of the World Trading System from GATT to WTO", Oxford Univ Press, pp 161-177.
  10. Ko, Yong-Bu (2006) "A Comparative Study on the Criteria for Determining Origin in Korea's FTA", International Trade Law, 71, pp.10-39.
  11. Shin, Han-Dong (2007) "A Study on the determination on Rules of Origin of the Goods", The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, 8(4), pp.133-153.
  12. Jeong, Jae-Wang (2007) "Legal Basis and Application Limits of the Rules of Origin", Korea Customs and Trade Development Institute, 439, pp.73-75.
  13. Korea Customs Service, FTA potal, cited at http://www.customs.go.kr/kcshome/site/index.do?layoutSiteId=ftaportalkor
  14. Korea Iron & Steel Association, Steel Data, cited at http://steeldata.kosa.or.kr/default.jsp
  15. Korea Iron & Steel Association, "Steel Production Capacity", 2009
  16. World Steel, cited at https://www.worldsteel.org/