참고문헌
- SEDENTEXCT Guideline Development Panel. Radiation protection No 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. Luxembourg: European Commission Directorate-General for Energy; 2012.
- International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2004; 34: 1-73.
- Choi JW, Lee SS, Choi SC, Heo MS, Huh KH, Yi WJ, et al. Relationship between physical factors and subjective image quality of cone-beam computed tomography images according to diagnostic task. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 119: 357-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.11.010
- Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, Bosmans H, et al. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: 127-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.020
- Nakahara S, Tachibana M, Watanabe Y. One-year analysis of Elekta CBCT image quality using NPS and MTF. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016; 17: 211-22. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6047
- Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Modulation transfer function evaluation of cone beam computed tomography for dental use with the oversampling method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/27069629
- Ozaki Y, Watanabe H, Nomura Y, Honda E, Sumi Y, Kurabayashi T. Location dependency of the spatial resolution of cone beam computed tomography for dental use. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: 648-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.07.009
- Bamba J, Araki K, Endo A, Okano T. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120445. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120445
- Elkhateeb SM, Torgersen GR, Arnout EA. Image quality assessment of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20160075. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160075
- de Oliveira MV, Wenzel A, Campos PS, Spin-Neto R. Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 46: 20160329 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160329
- Choi JW. Analysis of the priority of anatomic structures according to the diagnostic task in cone-beam computed tomographic images. Imaging Sci Dent 2016; 46: 245-9. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2016.46.4.245
- Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-78. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/15779208
- Ozer SY. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. J Endod 2011; 37: 75-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.021
- Liedke GS, da Silveira HE, da Silveira HL, Dutra V, de Figueiredo JA. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod 2009; 35: 233-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.005
- Kwan AL, Boone JM, Yang K, Huang SY. Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner. Med Phys 2007; 34: 275-81. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2400830
- Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, Sakamaki K, Harata Y, Sakaino R, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 51-9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/54013049
- Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77: 397-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.023
- Ludlow JB, Walker C. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 802-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.013
- Torgersen GR, Hol C, Moystad A, Hellen-Halme K, Nilsson M. A phantom for simplified image quality control of dental cone beam computed tomography units. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 118: 603-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.08.003
- Steiding C, Kolditz D, Kalender WA. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography. Med Phys 2014; 41: 031901. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4863507
- Dillenseger JP, Matern JF, Gros CI, Bornert F, Goetz C, Le Minor JM, et al. MSCT versus CBCT: evaluation of high-resolution acquisition modes for dento-maxillary and skull-base imaging. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 505-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3439-8
피인용 문헌
- 콘빔전산화단층촬영에서 노출 조건에 따른 화질 유지 및 선량 감소에 대한 평가 vol.14, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2020.14.4.353
- Influence of voxel size on micro-CT analysis of debris after root canal preparation vol.35, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0008