DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the evaluation of maxillary sinus pathology related to maxillary posterior teeth: Do apical lesions increase the risk of maxillary sinus pathology?

  • Terlemez, Arslan (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University) ;
  • Tassoker, Melek (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University) ;
  • Kizilcakaya, Makbule (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University) ;
  • Gulec, Melike (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University)
  • Received : 2019.01.18
  • Accepted : 2019.04.07
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aims of this study were first, to compare panoramic radiography with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for evaluating topographic relationships, such as the classification of maxillary posterior teeth and their distance to the maxillary sinus floor; and second, to determine the relationship between maxillary sinus pathology and the presence of apical lesions. Materials and Methods: In total, 285 paired CBCT and panoramic radiography records of patients (570 maxillary sinuses) were retrospectively analyzed. Both imaging modalities were used to determine the topographic relationship of the maxillary posterior teeth to the sinus floor. Mucosal thickening >2 mm was considered a pathological state. Data were analyzed using the chi-square, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals(CIs) were calculated. Results: The closest vertical distance measurements made between posterior maxillary teeth roots and the maxillary sinus on panoramic radiography and CBCT scans showed statistically significant differences from each other(P<0.05). Compared to panoramic radiography, CBCT showed higher mean values for the distance between the maxillary sinus floor and maxillary posterior teeth roots. The CBCT images showed that at least 1 apical lesion adjacent to the right maxillary sinus increased the risk of maxillary sinus pathology by 2.37 times(OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.58-3.55, P<0.05). Conclusion: Panoramic radiography might lead to unreliable diagnoses when evaluating the distance between the sinus floor and posterior roots of the maxillary teeth. Periapical lesions anatomically associated with maxillary sinuses were a risk factor for sinus mucosal thickening.

Keywords

References

  1. Lu Y, Liu Z, Zhang L, Zhou X, Zheng Q, Duan X, et al. Associations between maxillary sinus mucosal thickening and apical periodontitis using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a retrospective study. J Endod 2012; 38: 1069-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.027
  2. Melen I, Lindahl L, Andreasson L, Rundcrantz H. Chronic maxillary sinusitis. Definition, diagnosis and relation to dental infections and nasal polyposis. Acta Otolaryngol 1986; 101: 320-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488609132845
  3. Abrahams JJ, Glassberg RM. Dental disease: a frequently unrecognized cause of maxillary sinus abnormalities? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1219-23. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.5.8615273
  4. Doud Galli SK, Lebowitz RA, Giacchi RJ, Glickman R, Jacobs JB. Chronic sinusitis complicating sinus lift surgery. Am J Rhinol 2001; 15: 181-6. https://doi.org/10.2500/105065801779954120
  5. Kretzschmar DP, Kretzschmar JL. Rhinosinusitis: review from a dental perspective. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 128-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00306-8
  6. Savolainen S, Eskelin M, Jousimies-Somer H, Ylikoski J. Radiological findings in the maxillary sinuses of symptomless young men. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1997; 529: 153-7.
  7. Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S, Soikkonen K, Norblad A. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: results from the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e80-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.031
  8. Ren S, Zhao H, Liu J, Wang Q, Pan Y. Significance of maxillary sinus mucosal thickening in patients with periodontal disease. Int Dent J 2015; 65: 303-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12186
  9. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J, Jacobs R. Comparative assessment of panoramic radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0963-x
  10. von Arx T, Fodich I, Bornstein MM. Proximity of premolar roots to maxillary sinus: a radiographic survey using conebeam computed tomography. J Endod 2014; 40: 1541-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.022
  11. Sharan A, Madjar D. Correlation between maxillary sinus floor topography and related root position of posterior teeth using panoramic and cross-sectional computed tomography imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 375-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.031
  12. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050586
  13. Bremke M, Sesterhenn AM, Murthum T, Al Hail A, Bien S, Werner JA. Digital volume tomography (DVT) as a diagnostic modality of the anterior skull base. Acta Otolaryngol 2009; 129: 1106-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480802620621
  14. Maestre-Ferrin L, Galan-Gil S, Carrillo-Garcia C, Penarrocha-Diago M. Radiographic findings in the maxillary sinus: comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 341-6.
  15. Shanbhag S, Karnik P, Shirke P, Shanbhag V. Association between periapical lesions and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 2013; 39: 853-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.010
  16. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 106-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018
  17. Howe RB. First molar radicular bone near the maxillary sinus: a comparison of CBCT analysis and gross anatomic dissection for small bony measurement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 264-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.021
  18. Hauman CH, Chandler NP, Tong DC. Endodontic implications of the maxillary sinus: a review. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 127-41. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0143-2885.2001.00524.x
  19. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 114-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.001
  20. Oberli K, Bornstein MM, von Arx T. Periapical surgery and the maxillary sinus: radiographic parameters for clinical outcome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 848-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.09.017
  21. Eberhardt JA, Torabinejad M, Christiansen EL. A computed tomographic study of the distances between the maxillary sinus floor and the apices of the maxillary posterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 73: 345-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90133-B
  22. Kwak HH, Park HD, Yoon HR, Kang MK, Koh KS, Kim HJ. Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33: 382-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.012
  23. Nishikawa K, Suehiro A, Sekine H, Kousuge Y, Wakoh M, Sano T. Is linear distance measured by panoramic radiography reliable? Oral Radiol 2010; 26: 16-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-010-0038-5
  24. Lopes LJ, Gamba TO, Bertinato JV, Freitas DQ. Comparison of panoramic radiography and CBCT to identify maxillary posterior roots invading the maxillary sinus. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20160043. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160043
  25. Brullmann DD, Schmidtmann I, Hornstein S, Schulze RK. Correlation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) findings in the maxillary sinus with dental diagnoses: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1023-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0620-1
  26. Pommer B, Unger E, Suto D, Hack N, Watzek G. Mechanical properties of the Schneiderian membrane in vitro. Clin Oral Implant Res 2009; 20: 633-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01686.x
  27. Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, Cardesi E, Romano F. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1128-32.
  28. Cagici CA, Yilmazer C, Hurcan C, Ozer C, Ozer F. Appropriate interslice gap for screening coronal paranasal sinus tomography for mucosal thickening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 266: 519-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0786-6
  29. Brullmann D, Schulze RK. Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications - what do we know today? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140204. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140204
  30. Temmerman A, Hertele S, Teughels W, Dekeyser C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Are panoramic images reliable in planning sinus augmentation procedures? Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 189-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02000.x

Cited by

  1. Influence of the Periapical Status of the Posterior Maxillary Teeth on the Width of the Schneiderian Membrane of the Maxillary Sinus Mucosa vol.11, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093908