DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Absorption and Release, Survival Efficiency and Recovery Rate of Transport Medium according to the CLSI M40-A2 Standard

CLSI M40-A2 기준에 따른 수송배지의 흡수 및 배출, 생존 효율, 회수율 평가

  • Ha, Sung-Il (Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Suk, Hyun-Soo (Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Jeong-Seob (Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Heo, Woong (Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kang-Gyun (Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu Saint Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Park, Yeon-Joon (Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine)
  • 하성일 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 석현수 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 신정섭 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 허웅 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 박강균 (가톨릭대학교 의정부성모병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 박연준 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 진단검사의학과)
  • Received : 2019.05.03
  • Accepted : 2019.05.25
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

The absorption and release capacities, survival efficiency, and recovery rates of five kinds of transport media were evaluated based on the swab elution method (Quantitative) of CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) M40-A2. Liquid media showed mostly better results than semi-solid media in the three evaluations. The flocked swabs had better ability to absorption and discharge bacteria than the standard swabs. The liquid medium (S4) had the best survival efficiency. Pneumococcal strains with poor growth had a higher survival efficiency and recovery rate in liquid media (S4, S5). The results of microbial recovery showed that S. pyogenes met all the CLSI standards in all media. S. pneumoniae was inadequate in the semi- solid media (S2, S3) and all the remaining media met the criteria. H. influenzae was unsuitable in semi-solid media (S1, S3) and met the criteria in semi-solid medium (S2) and liquid medium (S4, S5). The viability of the H. influenzae, pneumococcal strain causing respiratory disease, was poor in most media. Overgrowth of P. aeruginosa was observed at room temperature. The combination of liquid medium and flocked swab confirmed the best results in the three evaluation methods.

5종류의 수송배지를 흡수 및 배출 능력, 생존 효율, 회수율을 CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) M40-A2의 Swab elution method (Quantitative) 기준으로 평가하였다. 액체배지가 반유동 배지보다 3가지 평가에서 대부분 우수한 결과값을 보여주었다. Flocked swab이 standard swab 형태보다 균의 흡수 및 배출의 능력 또한 우수하였다. 생존 효율에 대한 평가 결과는 액체배지(S4)가 가장 우수한 결과값을 보였다. 성장이 좋지 않은 S. pneumoniae는 액체배지(S4, S5)에서 생존효율과 회수율이 높았다. 균 회수율 평가 결과는 S. pyogenes는 모든 배지에서 CLSI 기준에 적합하였다. S. pneumoniae는 반유동 배지(S2, S3)에서 부적합하였고, 나머지 배지는 모두 기준에 적합하였다. H. influenzae는 반유동 배지(S1, S3)에서 부적합하였고, 반유동 배지(S2), 액체배지(S4, S5)에서 기준에 적합하였다. 호흡기 질환을 유발하는 S. pneumonia, H. influenzae의 생존 능력은 대부분의 배지에서 좋지 않았다. P. aeruginosa는 실온에서 과성장이 관찰되었다. 액체배지와 flocked swab의 조합이 3가지 평가 방법에서 가장 뛰어난 결과를 평가를 통해 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Van Horn KG, Audette CD, Sebeck D, Tucker KA. Comparison of the copan ESwab system with two amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1655-1658. http://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02047-07.
  2. Drake C, Barenfanger J, Lawhorn J, Verhulst S. Comparison of easy-flow copan liquid stuart's and starplex swab transport systems for recovery of fastidious aerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1301-1303. http://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.3.1301-1303.2005.
  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Quality control of microbiological transport systems. Approved standard-second edition. M40-A2. Wayne, Pensylvania: CLSI; 2014.
  4. de Burger B, Mortensen J. What's new in the world of swabs? J Contin Educ Top Issues. 2008;10:18-22.
  5. Wilkinson AE. Note on use of stuart's transport medium for isolation of gonococcus. Br J Vener Dis. 1951;27:200-201. http://doi.org/10.1136/sti.27.4.200.
  6. Morris GK, Heck J. Quality of cary - blair transport medium after aging nineteen months. J Clin Microbiol. 1978;8:616-617. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.8.5.616-617.1978
  7. Amies CR. A modified formula for the preparation of stuart's transport medium. Can J Public Health. 1967;58:296-300.
  8. Gizzie N, Adukwu E. Evaluation of liquid-based swab transport systems against the new approved CLSI M40-A2 standard. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1152-1156. http://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03337-15.
  9. Avolio M, Camporese A. Liquid based microbiological transport systems: conformity assessment of two commercial devices. J Microbiol Methods. 2015;115:42-44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2015.05.004.
  10. Probst A, Facius R, Wirth R, Moissl-Eichinger C. Validation of a nylon-flocked-swab protocol for efficient recovery of bacterial spores from smooth and rough surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:5148-5158. http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00399-10.
  11. van Horn KG, Rankin I. Evaluation and comparison of two stuart's liquid swab transport systems tested by the CLSI M40 method. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26:583-586. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-007-0328-y.
  12. Morosini MI, Loza E, Gutierrez O, Almaraz F, Baquero F, Canton R. Evaluation of 4 swab transport systems for the recovery of ATCC and clinical strains with characterized resistance mechanisms. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;56:19-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.02.011.
  13. Rishmawi N, Ghneim R, Kattan R, Ghneim R, Zoughbi M, Abu-Diab A, et al. Survival of fastidious and non-fastidious aerobic bacteria in three bacterial transport swab systems. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1278-1283. http://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02110-06.
  14. Wigger C, Morris PS, Stevens M, Smith-Vaughan H, Hare K, Beissbarth J, et al. A comparison of flocked nylon swabs and non-flocked rayon swabs for detection of respiratory bacteria in nasopharyngeal carriage in Australian Indigenous children. J Microbiol Methods. 2019;157:47-49. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.013.
  15. Moran-Gilad J1, Schwartz D, Navon-Venezia S, Carmeli Y. Laboratory evaluation of the eSwab transport system for the recovery of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1429-1433. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1460-2.