Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Low and High Viscosity Bulk-Fill Giomer-based and Resin-based composites

저점도 및 고점도 Bulk-fill Giomer 복합레진과 Bulk-fill 복합레진의 전환율과 중합수축

  • Kim, Heera (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Jaesik (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyunjung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Taeyub (Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Nam, Soonhyeun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김희라 (경북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이제식 (경북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김현정 (경북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 권태엽 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료학교실) ;
  • 남순현 (경북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2018.10.01
  • Accepted : 2018.10.23
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the degree of conversion and polymerization shrinkage of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomer-based and resin-based composites. Two bulk-fill giomer (Beautifil Bulk Restorative (BBR), Beautifil Bulk Flowable (BBF)), two bulk-fill (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (TBF), SureFil SDR flow (SDR)) and two conventional resin composites (Tetric N-Ceram (TN), Tetric N-flow (TF)) were selected for this study. The degree of conversion was measured by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Polymerization shrinkage was measured with the linometer. For all depth, BBR had the lowest degree of conversion and SDR had the highest. At 4 mm, the degree of conversion of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomer resin composites was lower than that of bulk-fill resin composites (p < 0.05). At the depth between 2 mm and 4 mm, there were significant difference with TBF, TN and TF (p < 0.05), while no significant difference in the degree of conversion was measured for BBR, BBF and SDR. Polymerization shrinkage of six resin composites decreased in the following order: TF > SDR > BBF > TBF > TN and BBR (p < 0.05). Polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill giomer resin composites was lower than that of bulk-fill resin composites (p < 0.05). From this study, it is found that the bulk-fill giomer resin composites and TBF were not sufficiently cured in 4 mm depth. The degree of conversion of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomer resin composites was significantly lower than bulk-fill resin composites in both 2 mm and 4 mm depths. Therefore, such features of bulk-fill giomer resin composites should be carefully considered in clinical application.

이번 연구에서는 저점도 및 고점도 bulk-fill giomer 복합레진의 전환율과 중합수축을 기존 bulk-fill 복합레진 및 전통적 복합레진과 비교 평가해보고자 하였다. Bulk-fill giomer 복합레진 2종류(Beautifil Bulk Restorative(BBR), Beautifil Bulk Flowable(BBF)), bulk-fill 복합레진 2종류(Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill(TBF), SureFil SDR flow(SDR)), 전통적 복합레진 2종류(Tetric N-Ceram(TN), Tetric N-flow(TF))를 사용하였다. 중합도 측정은 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy을 사용하였으며, 중합수축은 linometer을 이용하여 측정하였다. 복합레진 하면의 전환율 측정 결과 2 mm와 4 mm 깊이 모두 BBR에서 가장 낮게 나왔으며, SDR에서 가장 높게 나왔다. 4 mm 깊이에서 고점도 및 저점도 bulk-fill giomer 복합레진의 전환율은 bulk-fill 복합레진에 비해 유의하게 낮은 값을 보였다(p < 0.05). 깊이에 따른 전환율 비교 시 TBF, TN, TF는 유의차를 보였으며(p < 0.05), BBR, BBF, SDR는 유의차를 보이지 않았다. 중합수축은 TF > SDR > BBF > TBF > TN, BBR 순서로 감소 했으며(p < 0.05), bulk-fill giomer 복합레진은 bulk-fill 복합레진보다 낮은 중합수축량을 보였다(p < 0.05). 이번 연구 결과 4 mm 깊이에서 bulk-fill giomer 복합레진 및 TBF는 불충분한 중합을 나타냈으며, 2 mm와 4 mm 모두에서 고점도 및 저점도 bulk-fill giomer 복합레진은 bulk-fill 복합레진에 비해 낮은 전환율을 보였다. 그러므로 bulk-fill giomer 복합레진의 임상적인 적용을 위해서는 이에 대한 충분한 고찰 및 주의가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Moraes RR, Garcia JW, Stansbury JW, et al. : Control of polymerization shrinkage and stress in nanogel-modified monomer and composite materials. Dent Mater, 27:509-519, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.006
  2. Shortall AC, Wilson HJ, Harrington E : Depth of cure of radiation-activated composite restoratives-influence of shade and opacity. J Oral Rehabil, 22:337-342, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00782.x
  3. Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB : Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent, 26:406-411, 2001.
  4. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC : Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. Am J Dent, 16:239-243, 2003.
  5. Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, et al. : Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent, 31:437-444, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00121-5
  6. Garcia D, Yaman P, Dennison J, Neiva G : Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk fill flowable composite resins. Oper Dent, 39:441-448, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-484-L
  7. Marovic D, Taubock TT, Tarle Z, et al. : Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand, 73:474-480, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.992810
  8. Ilie N, Kessler A, Durner J : Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites. J Dent, 41:695-702, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.008
  9. Jang JH, Park SH, Hwang IN : Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin. Oper Dent, 40:172-180, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-307-L
  10. Moszner N, Fischer UK, Rheinberger V, et al. : Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater, 24:901-907, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.004
  11. Gonulol N, Ozer S, Sen Tunc E : Water Sorption, Solubility, and Color Stability of Giomer Restoratives. J Esthet Restor Dent, 27:300-306, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12119
  12. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF : Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater, 20:789-795, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009
  13. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G : Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J, 15:253-258, 1991.
  14. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G : Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials, 24:655-665, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-0
  15. Carmichael AJ, Gibson JJ, Walls AW : Allergic contact dermatitis to bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (BisGMA) dental resin associated with sensitivity to epoxy resin. Br Dent J, 183:297-298, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809499
  16. Hansel C, Leyhausen G, Mai UE, Geurtsen W : Effetcs of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries-associated micro-organisms in vitro. J Dent Res, 77:60-67, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770010601
  17. Stansbury JW, Dickens SH : Determination of double bond conversion in dental resins by near infrared spectroscopy. Dent Mater, 17:71-79, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00062-2
  18. de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL : True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composite determined with a linometer. Dent Mater, 9:11-14, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90097-A
  19. Fujimoto Y, Iwasa M, Nakatsuka T, et al. : Detection of ions released from S-PRG fillers and their modulation effect. Dent Mater, 29:392-397, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2010-015
  20. Varpio M : Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition. Swed Dent J Suppl, 96:1-47, 1993.
  21. Rueggeberg FA, Cratg RG : Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res, 67:932-937, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670060801
  22. Bala O, Olmez A, Kalayci S : Effect of LED and halogen light curing on polymerization of resin-based composites. J Oral Rehabil, 32:134-140, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01399.x
  23. Asmussen E : Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scand J Dent Res, 90:490-496, 1982.
  24. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts D : Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater, 16:292-296, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00020-8
  25. Czasch P, Ilie N : In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig, 17:227-235, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8
  26. Yu P, Yap A, Wang XY : Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites. Oper Dent, 42:82-89, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-027-L
  27. Noh T, Song E, Jeong T, et al. : Comparison of the Mechanical Properties between Bulk-fill and Conventional Composites. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 43:365-373, 2016.
  28. Al-Ahdal K, Ilie N, Silikas N, Watts DC : Polymerization kinetics and impact of post polymerization on the Degree of Conversion of bulk-fill resin-composite at clinically relevant depth. Dent Mater, 31:1207-1213, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.004
  29. Ilie N, Fleming GJ : In vitro comparison of polymerisation kinetics and the micro-mechanical properties of low and high viscosity giomers and RBC materials. J Dent, 43:814-822, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.009
  30. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Miyazaki M, et al. : Depth of cure, flexural properties and volumetric shrinkage of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomers and resin composites. Dent Mater J, 36:205-213, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-131
  31. Yap AU, Pandya M, Toh WS : Depth of cure of contemporary bulk-fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater, 35:503-510, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-402
  32. Garoushi S, Sailynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L : Corrigendum to 'Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite' [Dent Mater 29 (8) (2013) 835-841]. Dent Mater, 32:1196, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.001
  33. AlQahtani MQ, Michaud PL, Price RB, et al. : Effect of High Irradiance on Depth of Cure of a Conventional and a Bulk Fill Resin-based Composite. Oper Dent, 40:662-672, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-244-L
  34. Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Giannini M, et al. : Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater, 31:1542-1551, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.001
  35. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G : Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials, 23:1819-1829, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00308-8
  36. Bausch JR, de Lange K, de Gee AJ, et al. : Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent, 48:59-67, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90048-8
  37. Lim MY, Cho KM, Hong CU : Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins cured by variable light intensities. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent, 32:28-36, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.1.028
  38. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL : Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater, 21:962-970, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.018
  39. Ilie N, Hickel R : Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDRTM technology. Dent Mater, 27:348-355, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014
  40. Ferracane JL : Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict? Dent Mater, 29:51-58, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013
  41. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL : Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater, 6:167-171, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90023-8
  42. Kinomoto Y, Torii M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S : Comparison of polymerization contraction stresses between self- and lightcuring composites. J Dent, 27:383-389, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00065-7