DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Maxillary Lateral Incisor Agenesis on Skeletodental Characteristics in Mixed Dentition

상악 측절치 결손이 어린이 안면골격과 치열궁 형태에 미치는 영향

  • Nam, Siyeon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Jonghyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Jiyeon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Taesung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 남시연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 신종현 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김지연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 정태성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김신 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2018.09.21
  • Accepted : 2018.10.29
  • Published : 2019.05.31

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate skeletodental characteristics of patient with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA) in mixed dentition. It involved the children in early mixed dentition who visited Pusan National University dental hospital for orthodontic purposed and had intact primary canines. 38 children with MLIA and 38 controls with the same chronological age satisfying the inclusion criteria were selected. The craniofacial structures and dental arch dimensions of the MLIA were evaluated using model & cephalometric analysis and compared to controls. The rate of unilateral MLIA was high in male and the rate of bilateral MLIA was high in female. In model analysis, the width / length ratio of maxillary anterior portion of the MLIA group were higher and arch perimeter of the maxilla of the MLIA group were smaller than those of the control group (p = 0.003, 0.04). Cephalometric analysis showed that there were no significant differences in terms of skeletal, dental analysis. In soft tissue profile, nasolabial angle was larger in MLIAs than in controls (p = 0.039). Considering these skeletodental characteristics of MLIA, early diagnosis and proper management is highly recommended to minimize the possibility of functional defect.

이 연구는 상악 측절치 선천결손을 보이는 초기 혼합치열기 아동의 골격 및 치아치조 특성을 평가하고자 하였다. 부산대학교 치과병원 소아치과에 교정진단 및 치료를 목적으로 내원한 초기 혼합치열기의 상, 하악 유견치가 모두 존재하는 아동 중, 상악 측절치를 제외한 나머지 치아 결손이 없는 38명의 상악 측절치 결손군과 대상 기준을 만족시키는 동일한 치령의 대조군 38명을 선정하였다. 각 군의 측모 두부계측 방사선분석과 모형 분석의 측정값을 비교하여 상악 측절치 결손군의 골격 및 치아치조 특성을 평가하였다. 성별에 따른 결손의 총 비율은 남아가 더 높았고 편측 결손군에서는 남아의 비율이 더 높았지만 양측 결손군에서는 여아의 비율이 더 높았다. 모형 분석에서 결손군은 대조군에 비해 상악 전방부 폭경 대 장경 비가 크게 나타났고(p = 0.003), 총악궁둘레는 작게 나타났다(p = 0.04). 측모 두부계측 방사선분석 결과, 골격 및 치아적 측면에서는 유의한 차이가 없었고, 연조직 외형에서 결손군이 대조군에 비해 nasolabial angle이 큰 값을 나타냈다(p = 0.039). 상악 측절치 결손 아동의 골격 및 치아치조 특징에 유념하여 뚜렷한 안모 및 기능 이상을 보이기 이전에 조기 진단 후 적절한 관리를 통해 기능적 결함의 가능성을 최소화 시키는 것이 추천된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ben-Bassat Y, Brin I : Skeletal and dental patterns in patients with severe congenital absence of teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135:349-356, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.002
  2. Ben-Bassat Y, Brin I : Skeletodental patterns in patients with multiple congenitally missing teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124:521-525, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00620-6
  3. Cobourne MT : Familial human hypodontia-is it all in the genes? Br Dent J, 203:203-208, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.732
  4. Chung CJ, Han JH, Kim KH : The pattern and prevalence of hypodontia in Koreans. Oral Dis, 14:620-625, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01434.x
  5. Lee RT : Arch width and form: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115:305-313, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70334-3
  6. Endo T, Ozoe R, Yoshino S, Shimooka S : Hypodontia patterns and variations in craniofacial morphology in Japanese orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod, 76:996-1003, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2319/082905-303
  7. Op Heij DG, Opdebeeck H, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M : Age as compromising factor for implant insertion. Periodontol 2000, 33:172-184, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.03314.x
  8. Buyuk SK, Ozkan S, Celik E, et al. : Evaluation of the skeletal and dental effects in orthodontic patients with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis. J Esthet Restor Dent, 29:284-290, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12306
  9. Bassiouny DS, Afify AR, Zawawi KH, et al. : Prevalence of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and associated skeletal characteristics in an orthodontic patient population. Acta Odontol Scand, 74:456-459, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2016.1193625
  10. Aasheim B, Ogaard B : Hypodontia in 9-year-old Norwegians related to need of orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res, 101:257-260, 1993.
  11. Sung JH, Kwon OW, Kyung HM, Park KD : A longitudinal cephalometric study of the craniofacial growth changes of Koreans aged from 8 to 16 years. Korean J Orthod, 22:491-507, 1992.
  12. Alvesalo L, Portin P : The inheritance pattern of missing, peg-shaped, and strongly mesio-distally reduced upper lateral incisors. Acta Odontol Scand, 27:563-575, 1969. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356909026309
  13. Muller TP, Hill IN, Petersen AC, Blayney JR : A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 81:101-107, 1970. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0151
  14. Tavajohi-Kermani H, Kapur R, Sciote JJ : Tooth agenesis and craniofacial morphology in an orthodontic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122:39-47, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.123948
  15. Polder BJ, Van't Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM : A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 32:217-226, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00158.x
  16. Hunstadbraten K : Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. ASDC J Dent Child, 40:115-117, 1973.
  17. Werther R, Rothenberg F : Anodontia: a review of its etiology with presentation of a case. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 25:61-81, 1939.
  18. Brekhus PJ, Oliver CP, Montelius G : A study of the pattern and combinations of congenitally missing teeth in man. J Dent Res, 23:117-131, 1944. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345440230020401
  19. Shapiro SD, Farrington FH : A potpourri of syndromes with anomalies of dentition. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, 19:129-140, 1983.
  20. Zhu JF, Marcushamer M, King DL, Henry RJ : Supernumerary and congenitally absent teeth: a literature review. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 20:87-95, 1996.
  21. Pinho T, Tavares P, Maciel P, Pollmann C : Developmental absence of maxillary lateral incisors in the Portuguese population. Eur J Orthod, 27:443-449, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji060
  22. Rolling S, Poulsen S : Oligodontia in Danish schoolchildren. Acta Odontol Scand, 59:111-112, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163501750157298
  23. Rolling S : Hypodontia of permanent teeth in Danish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res, 88:365-369, 1980.
  24. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D : Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131:510-514, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.027
  25. Goldstein MS, Stanton FL : Changes in dimensions and form of the dental arches with age. Int J Orthod Dent Child, 21:357-380, 1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-0522(35)90163-0
  26. Cohen JT : Growth and development of the dental arch in children. J Am Dent Assoc, 27:1250-1260, 1940. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1940.0262
  27. Sillman JH : Dimensional changes of the dental arches: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod, 50:824-842, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90040-5
  28. Yang YM, Baik BJ, Kim JG : A study on the volumes and forms of the palate for deciduous and permanent dentition. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 30:696-706, 2003.
  29. Le Bot P, Salmon D : Congenital defects of the upper lateral incisors (ULI): condition and measurements of the other teeth, measurements of the superior arch, head and face. Am J Phys Anthropol, 46:231-243, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330460204
  30. Woodworth DA, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG : Bilateral congenital absence of maxillary lateral incisors: a craniofacial and dental cast analysis. Am J Orthod, 87:280-293, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90003-X
  31. Wisth P, Thunold K, Boe OE : Frequency of hypodontia in relation to tooth size and dental arch width. Acta Odontol Scand, 32:201-206, 1974. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357409002548
  32. Fekonja A : Hypodontia in orthodontically treated children. Eur J Orthod, 27:457-460, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji027
  33. Al-Anezi SA : Orthodontic treatment for a patient with hypodontia involving the maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139:690-697, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.042
  34. Robertsson S, Mohlin B : The congenitally missing upper lateral incisor. A retrospective study of orthodontic space closure versus restorative treatment. Eur J Orthod, 22:697-710, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.6.697
  35. Stuart CE, Stallard H : Diagnosis and treatment of occlusal relations of the teeth. Texas Dent J, 75:430-435, 1957.
  36. Shaw WC : Orthodontics & occlusal management. Br Dent J, 177:120-121, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808521