참고문헌
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2001). Atlas of science literacy I. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2007). Atlas of science literacy II. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) subjects on students' learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM education, 12(5/6), 23-37.
- Bentler, M., & Bonett, G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
- Bentler, M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in Life, Physical, and Earth Science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955-970. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20249
- Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long [Eds.], Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage.
- Bryan, R., Glynn, S., & Kittleson, J. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95, 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20462
- Byrne, M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Campbell, T., Lee, H., Kwon, H., & Park, K. (2012). Student motivation and interests as proxies for forming STEM identities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(3), 532-540. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.3.532
- Carmines, E., & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt, & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Choi, E. (2017). Study on how art-centered STEAM program influences the learner's creativity. Journal of Art Education, 48(0), 187-223. https://doi.org/10.35657/jae.2017.48..008
- Glynn, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20181
- Glynn, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1) 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267
- Glynn, S., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442
- Jeong, H., & Lee, H. (2017). Development and application of scientific inquiry-based STEAM education program for free-learning semester in middle school. Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 334-350. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.334
- Jung, J., Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2015). Domestic and international experts' perception of policy and direction on STEAM education. Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 358-375. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.3.358
- Kane, M. A., Beals, C., Valeau, E. J., & Johnson, M. J. (2004). Fostering success among traditionally underrepresented student groups: Hartnell College's approach to implementation of the Math, Engineering, and Science Achievement (Mesa) program. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920490251944
- Kang, N.-H., Lee, N., Rho, M., & Yoo, J. (2018). Meta analysis of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) program effect on student learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 38(6), 875-883.
- Kim, J. (2018). A study on the effects of science education STEAM program on augment reality for intellectual disabilities. Journal of Mental Retardation, 20(3), 151-175.
- Kline, B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
- Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC]. (2012a). Teacher training program for STEAM education. Seoul, Korea: Author.
- Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC]. (2012b). Introduction of STEAM education policy. Seoul, Korea: Author.
- Kwak, H., & Ryu, H. (2016). Analysis on the research trends in STEAM education. Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.1.72
- Kwon, H., & Lee, H. (2008). Motivation issues in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics(STEM) education: A meta-analytic approach. Secondary Education Journal, 56(3), 1-22.
- Kwon, H., Park, K., & Lee, H. (2009). Research trends on the integrative efforts in technology education: Reviews of the relevant journals. Secondary Education Journal, 57(1), 245-274. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2009.57.1.245
- Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) Education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress (RL33434).
- Ha, M., & Lee, J. (2012). Exploring the structure of science motivation components and differences in science motivation in terms of gender and preferred track. Secondary Education Research, 60(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2012.60.1.1
- Ha, M., Kim, M., Park, K., & Lee, J. (2012a). The analysis of differences in structure of natural science high school students' science learning motivation in terms of school year and gender. Secondary Education Research, 60(2), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2012.60.2.365
- Ha, M., Kim, M., Park, K., & Lee, J. (2012b). The analysis of level and structure of natural science high school students' science motivation compared to general high school students'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 866-878. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.5.866
- International Technology Education Association [ITEA]. (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Student assessment, professional development, and program standards. Reston, VA: Author.
- International Technology Education Association [ITEA]. (2005). Technological literacy for all. Reston, VA: Author.
- Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2015). The development and application of STEAM education program based on systems thinking for high school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 1007-1018. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.1007
- Lips D., & McNeill, J. B. (2009). A new approach to improving Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math education. Backgrounder, 2259, 1-10.
- Lee, E., & Tae, J. (2017). The effect of STEAM program based on design thinking on primary school pupil's convergent problem solving & interest in math-science. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 11(1), 143-162.
- Lee, H., Kwon, Y., Oh, H., Lee, H. (2011). Development and implementation of engineering design and scientific inquiry based STEM education program. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 301-326.
- Marsh, W., Hau, K., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MEST]. (2011). 2012 MEST policy report. Seoul, Korea: Author.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MEST]. (2012). Science Curriculum. Notification No.2011-361 of the MEST. Seoul, Korea: Author.
- Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). the 2015 revised national curriculum. Ministry of Education. Sejong, Korea: Author.
- Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2016). STEAM education. Ministry of Education. Sejong, Korea: Author.
- National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council [NRC]. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2007). PISA 2006 Science Competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume 1: Analysis. Paris, France: Author.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What student know and can do - student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014). Paris, France: Author.
- Packenham, E., Balls, M., & Reiter, D. (2018). Helping students succeed in high school and on the postsecondary pathway: A report on the USU STARS! I GEAR UP program. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.30777/APJER.2018.1.1.02
- Park, H.-W., & Shin, Y.-J. (2012). Effects of science lesson applying STEAM education on self-efficacy, interest, and attitude towards science. Biology Education, 40(1), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.1.132
- Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, December/January, 20-26.
- Sanders, M., Kwon, H., Park, K., & Lee, H. (2011). Integrative STEM(science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education: Contemporary trends and issues. Secondary Education Research, 59(3), 729-762. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2011.59.3.729
- Shin, M. (2018). Meta-analysis of the effects on the STEAM program for elementary school students. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 12(2), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.35304/JCI.12.2.03
- Son, M., Jeong, D., & Choi, W. (2017). Effects of nano-science based STEAM programs on the affective aspects of students under free semester courses. School Science Journal, 11(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.11.1.201702.77
- Song, K. (2014). The relation of intelligence, self-esteem, mathematical attitudes, and scientific attitudes of gifted students from low-income families. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(6), 1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.6.1039
- Williams, J. (2011). STEM Education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 26-35.
- Yoo, M., Park, G., Choi, J., Lim, M., Lee, J., Shin, M., Lee, C., Lee, Y., Yu, H., & Chung, H. (2016). The development of appropriate technology theme STEAM program for the elementary students and its application effects on creative thinking activity, scientific attitude and leadership. Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 144-165. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.2.144