DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Selection Criteria of Small-Scales Reservoirs for Emergency Action Plan(EAP) Establishment

소규모 저수지 대상 비상대처계획 수립 선정기준 연구

  • Park, Ki-Chan (Head Office, Korea Water Resources Corporation) ;
  • Choi, Kyung-Sook (Department of Agricultural Civil Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2019.02.28
  • Accepted : 2019.05.14
  • Published : 2019.05.31

Abstract

This study developed selection criteria of small-scales reservoirs, having under $300,000m^3$ storage capacity, for the Emergency Action Plan(EAP) establishment in order to reduce the disaster risks of the reservoir's failures. Those reservoirs are out of ranges of Korean EAP establishment standard, but have potential risk of disasters as they have often failed by the recent extreme rainfall events and earthquakes, causing economical and life losses. The problem of reservoir aging is also one of the reasons of them. In this study, the developed selection criteria of small reservoirs for EAP establishment are storage capacity, embankment height, reservoir age, heavy rain factor and earthquake factor. These criteria were selected based on the review of the existing EAP establishment guidelines, analysis of the past dam failure cases, and the previous related studies. The quantification of these criteria were conducted for the practical applications in the fields, and applied to 67 previous failures in order to investigate the relation of each criteria with these failures. The earthquake factor found to be the highest relations followed by heavy rain factors, combination of earthquake and heavy rain factors, and reservoir age. The classification was made as observation and review groups for EAP establishments based on overlapping numbers of each criteria. This classifications applied to 354 reservoirs designated as having the potential disaster risk by MOIS, and showed 38.4% of observation and 11.9% of review groups. Anticipatory monitoring and regular inspection should be made by professional facility managers for the observation group, and necessity of EAP establishment should be assessed for the review group based on the downstream status and financial budget.

Keywords

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 Procedure of the study

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2 Causes of the failures: (a) By dam type, (b) By dam age (MOLIT⋅K-water, 2016)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3 Failure records of dams and reservoirs

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4 Classification of dam and reservoir failures based on storage capacity

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5 Frequency of damage by heavy rainfall (MOIS, 2014)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6 Selection criteria application results for the past failure cases

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7 Selection criteria application results for the disaster risk reservoirs

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8 Degree of overlapping criteria on the past failure cases

Table 1 Classification of dam size based on storage capacity and height (CDA, 2017)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 Classification of dam risk based on design flood (CDA, 2017)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3 Classification of dam risk based on human injury and property damage (CDA, 2017)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4 Selection criteria for EAP establishment in this study

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5 Average break width and break time of fill dam (Lee, 1987)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6 Feasibility evaluation criteria for renovation of the disaster risk reservoirs (MOIS, 2016)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7 Over 4 magnitude earthquake occurrence area and earthquake zone of dam design standard (KMA, 2017; KWRA, 2011)

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8 Quantification of the reservoir selection criteria for EAP establishment

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9 Classification of EAP establishment group based on degree of overlapping criteria

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10 Application results of EAP establishment grouping for thedisaster risk reservoirs

NGHHCI_2019_v61n3_101_t0010.png 이미지

References

  1. CDA, 2017. Canadian dam safety guideline. Canadian Dam Association, Toronto, Canada.
  2. Choi, B. H., and C. H. Ryu, 2017. Preparing the failure forecast for the reservoir (fill dam) for doubling the performance utilization of the reservoir disaster prevention measurement business. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association 50(3): 36-44.
  3. Choi, H. S., 2009. Research trend analysis of flood from the reservoir failures. Journal of the Korean National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage 16(1): 30-33. doi:10.5391/JKIIS.2006.16.1.030.
  4. DESW (Department of Ecology State of Washington), 2013. Guidelines for developing dam emergency action plans. Washington, USA.
  5. FEMA, 2013. Federal government guidelines for dam safety. The Federal Emergency Management Agency of Washington, USA.
  6. ICOLD, 1998. Dam-break flood analysis. Bulletin of International Commission on Large Dam, 111. Paris, France.
  7. Kim, J. G., J. Y. Kim, and H. H. Kwon, 2017. Introduction of hydrologic dam risk assessment technique. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association 50(3): 28-35.
  8. KISTEC, 2015. A study on the identification and improvement of vulnerable factors through analysis of diagnosis results of dams and reservoir facilities. Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation.
  9. KMA, 2017. The records of over 4 magnitude earthquake occurrence (http://www.kma.go.kr/). Korea Meteorological Administration.
  10. KRC Gangleung Branch, 2012. Water disaster prevention business plan. Korea Rural Community Cooperation, Gangleung Branch.
  11. KRC, 2017. Accident records and management status of irrigation facilities. Korea Rural Community Cooperation.
  12. K-water, 2011. Research report of Emergency Action Plan (EAP) establishment for Gunwi multipurpose dam. Korea Water Resources Corporation, 1-7.
  13. KWRA, 2011. Dam design standard and commentary. Korea Water Resources Association, 609-617.
  14. Lee, J. T., 1987. Destruction of dam. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association 20(3): 186-188.
  15. MAFRA, 2016a. Statistical yearbook of agricultural infrastructure maintenance projects. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  16. MAFRA, 2016b. Status of national agricultural infrastructure facilities. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  17. MOIS, 2009. Guidelines of emergency action plan (EAP) establishments for dam and reservoirs' failures. Ministry of the Interior and Safety.
  18. MOIS, 2014. Annual report of disasters. Ministry of the Interior and Safety, 13-24.
  19. MOIS, 2016. Disaster risk reservoir and dam management guidelines. Ministry of the Interior and Safety.
  20. MOIS, 2015. Annual business report in 2015. Ministry of the Interior and Safety.
  21. MOLIT.K-water, 2016. Research report of emergency action plan (EAP) establishment for Four-major rivers multifunctional weir. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Water Resources Corporation, 3-1-3-31.
  22. MOLIT.K-water, 2017. Water and future. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Water Resources Corporation, 40-62.
  23. OPM (Office for Government Policy Coordination, Prime Minister's Secretariat), 1999. Water disaster prevention report. Sejong, Korea.