Table 1. The characteristics of science leading schools in 2017
Table 2. The characteristics of the students
Table 3. The characteristics of the teachers
Table 4. One-way ANOVA results of Test for Indicators of Positive Experiences about Science
Table 5. One-way ANOVA results of effects of teaching-learning methods on Positive Experiences about Science
Table 6. One-way ANOVA results of effects of teaching-learning materials on Positive Experiences about Science
Table 7. One-way ANOVA results of effects of assessment orientations on Positive Experiences about Science
Table 8. One-way ANOVA results of effects of assessment areas on Positive Experiences about Science
Table 9. One-way ANOVA results of effects of assessment subjects on Positive Experiences about Science
Table 10. One-way ANOVA results of effects of assessment methods on Positive Experiences about Science
참고문헌
- Baek, S. (2000). Principle of performance assessment. Seoul: Gyoyookgyahaksa.
- Cho, J., Kim, S., Kim, M., Ok, H. J., Lim, H. M., & Son, S. K. (2012). Ways of improving Korean students' affective characteristics based on PISA and TIMSS results (Research Report CRE 2012-4). Seoul: KICE.
- Choe, S., Kim, J., Park, S., Og, E., Kim, J., & Baek, H. (2013). Strategies for improving the affective characteristics of Korean students based on the results of PISA and TIMSS (Research Report RRE 2013-18). Seoul: KICE.
- Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Jung, Y.-H., Shin, S., & Lee, J.-K. (2015). The qualitative case study on science core school teachers' experiences of reflective practice. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 315-351. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2015.31.2.315
- Kim, H., Kwak, Y., Kang, H., Shin, Y., Lee, S., & Lee, S-Y. (2017). A study on the structural equation model among components of positive experiences about science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.3.507
- Kim, J., Na, J., & Song, J. (2018). Features of science classes in science core schools identified through semantic network analysis. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 565-574. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.4.565
- Kim, Y. (2009). Effects of project program on students' problem solving skills and attitude or interesting for science in the middle school science class (Doctoral dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
- Korean Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity (2015). Development research of draft of 2015 revised subject curriculum II - Science curriculum (Research Report BD15110002). Seoul: KOFAC.
- Ku, J., Cho, S., Lee, So., Park, H., & Ku, N. W. (2017). OECD programme for international students assessment: An in-depth analysis of PISA 2015 results (Research Report RRE 2017-9). Seoul: KICE.
- Kwak, Y., & Park., S. (2018). Effect analysis of educational context variables on 8th grade science achievement among top-performing countries in TIMSS 2015. Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2018.42.1.66
- Kwon, C., Hur, M., Yang, I., & Kim, Y. (2004). A cause analysis of learning environment variables of change in science attitudes on elementary and secondary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(6), 1256-1271.
- Lee, J.-R., & Lee, H.-S. (2017). A qualitative case study of science core school curriculum management. The Journal of Sustainable Design Educational Environment Research, 16(3), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.7743/KISEE.2017.16.3.037
- Lee, M., & Kim, G. (2004). Relationship between attitudes toward science and science achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(2), 399-407.
- Ministry of Education (2016a). General plans for science education. Ministry of Education Press Release (2016.2.).
- Ministry of Education (2016b). Result announcement of PISA 2015. Ministry of Education Press Release (2016. 12. 6.).
- Ministry of Education (2016c). Result announcement of TIMSS 2015. Ministry of Education Press Release (2016. 11. 29.).
- Oh, H.-R., & Kim, H.-B. (2011). A study on the extra curricula science-related hands-on experience programs implemented in science-focused high schools. School Science Journal, 5(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.15737/ssj.5.2.201108.73
- Park, Y., Jeong, H., & Lee K. Y. (2011). Exploring students' ability of 'Doing' scientific inquiry: The case of gifted students in science. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 32(2), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.2.225
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students' learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
- Sang, K., Kwak, Y., Park, J. H., & Park, S. (2016). The trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS): Findings from TIMSS 2015 for Korea (Research Report RRE 2012-4-3). Seoul: KICE.
- Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. (2007). Emotion in education. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
- Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S.-Y., & Lee, S. (2017a). A comparative analysis of the test tools in science-related affective domains. Biology Education, 45(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.1.41
- Shin, Y., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S.-Y., Lee, S., & Kang, H. (2017b). Study on the development of test for indicators of positive experiences about science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(2), 335-346.
- Son, J., Lee, B., Choi, J., Kim, J., Park, J., Seo, H., Shim, K., Lee, K., & Lee, S. (2013). Satisfactions with teaching and learning practices at science core schools and directions for improvement. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 63(4), 379-389. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.63.379
- Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.