Fig. 1. An example of realistic type inquiry context using virtual reality (4-1, p. 18).
Fig. 2. An example of realistic-abstract type inquiry context using augmented reality (5-1, p. 34).
Fig. 3. An example of manipulative description or measure using virtual experiment (4-2, p. 65).
Fig. 4. An example of nonmanipulative description or measure using virtual reality (6-1, p. 32).
Fig. 5. An example of phenomenon-based reasoning using virtual reality (3-1, p. 18).
Fig. 6. An example of relation-based reasoning using virtual experiment (4-2, p. 36).
Fig. 7. An example of good questions in inquiry activities using virtual reality.
Fig. 8. An example of good guidance in inquiry activities using virtual reality.
Table 1. Technology-based inquiry activities analyzed in this study
Table 2. The analysis framework of this study
Table 3. The status of technology-based inquiry activities
Table 4. The features of inquiry context presented in technology-based inquiry activities
Table 5. The features of inquiry methods presented in technology-based inquiry activities
Table 6. The types of reasoning presented in technology-based inquiry activities
참고문헌
- Balamuralithara, B. & Woods, P. C. (2009). Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 17(1), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20186
- Beier, K. P. (2004). Virtual reality: A short introduction. Retrieved February 2, 2004. from http://www.umich.edu/-vrl/intro/
- Brandon, R. N. (1994). Theory and experiment in evolutionary biology. Synthese, 99(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064530
- Collins, A. & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
- Duschl, R. & Grandy, R. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. In Duschl, R. & Grandy, R. (eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and application (pp. 1-37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Erduran, S. & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Fominykh, M., Prasolova-Forland, E., Morozov, M., Smorkalov, A. & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2014). Increasing immersiveness into a 3D virtual world: Motion-tracking and natural navigation in vAcademia. IERI Procedia, 7, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.08.007
- Kaufmann, H. & Dunser, A. (2007). Summary of usability evaluations of an educational augmented reality application. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4563, 660-669.
- Kaufmann, H. & Meyer, B. (2009). Physics education in virtual reality: An example. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2, 117-130.
- Kozhevnikov, M., Gurlitt, J. & Kozhevnikov, M. (2013). Learning relative motion concepts in immersive and non-immersive virtual environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 952-962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9441-0
- Lee, C., Park, C. & Hong, H-G. (2018). Design and effects of science simulation applications using flash and actionscript 3.0: In the composition of material chapter in middle school science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 527-539. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.4.527
- Leem, J. H. (2010). Digital textbook-based instruction in elementary school: Main issues and future tasks. The Journal of Korean Educational Forum, 9(1), 87-114.
- Lindgren, R. & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Spatial learning and computer simulations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595813
- Ministry of Education & Korea Education and Research Information Service. (2019). The guide for using realistic contents related to digital textbook in year 3 and 4. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.
- Mintz, R., Litvak, S. & Yair, Y. (2001). 3D-virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(3), 293-305.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Nunez, M., Quiros, R., Nunez, I., Carda, J. B. & Camahort, E. (2008). Collaborative augmented reality for inorganic chemistry education. Paper presented in the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Engineering Education (pp. 271-277). Heraklion: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society.
- Penuel, W. R. & Means, B. (2004). Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: Analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 294-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20002
- Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R. & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
- Salmi, H., Thuneberg, H. & Vainikainen, M. P. (2017). Making the invisible observable by augmented reality in informal science education context. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1254358
- Saltan, F. & Arslan, O. (2017). The use of augmented reality in formal education: A scoping review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(2), 503-520.
- Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism. A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
- Szalavari, Z. S. & Gervautz, M. (1997). The personal interaction panel - A two-handed interface for augmented reality. Computer Graphics Forum, 16(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.00171
- Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K. & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682-683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948
- Winn, W., Stahr, F., Sarason, C., Fruland, R., Oppenheimer, P. & Lee, Y. L. (2006). Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20097
- Yu, S. & Ryu, J. (2017). Development of virtual reality based teaching simulation with HMD for pre-service teachers: Usefulness of teaching scenarios and virtual presence. Teacher Education Research, 56(3), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.56.3.201709.309