It has been noted that in the original article Figs. 1, 2 and Table 1 had been incorrect. The followings are correct.
Fig. 1. Transmission electron micrographs or scanning electron micrographs of cells of the strains isolated in this study. Strains: 1, CAU 1470; 2, CAU 1475; 3, NA_1; 4, HC_48; 5, D7-24; 6, GH1-18; 7, GH1-39; 8, Gsoil 1173; 9, 17J72-9; 10, IMCC34147; 11, 17J28-11; 12, 17J49-8; 13, 17J49-11; 14, Ibu_O_11; 15, Ibu_ O_21; 16, MMS17-SY291; 17, LT2304; 18, JMn2; 19, JMn10; 20, WD9; 21, LM3301; 22, KYW1377; 23, Gsoil 335; 24, Gsoil 1175; 25, BE2-18; 26, Gsoil 1130; 27, 17J48-16; 28, Gsoil 006; 29, Gsoil 262; 30, MMS17-SY284; 31, MMS17-SY227; 32, MMS17-GJ001; 33, Gsoil 961; 34, Gsoil 1526; 35, Gsoil 554.
Fig. 2. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree, based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, showing the relationship between the strains isolattions per nucleotide position. ed in this study and their relatives of the class Actinobacteria. Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown above nodes. Filled circles indicate the nodes recovered by three other treeing methods including Maximum-likelihood, Maximum-parsimony and Neighbor-joining. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Table 1. The taxonomic affiliations of isolated strains belonging to the class Actinobacteria.
*Abbreviations: R2A, Reasoner’s 2A; ISP2, international streptomyces project medium 2; BHIA, brain heart infusion agar; MA, marine agar; TSA, tryptic soy agar; NA, nutrient agar.