DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation on Seismic Design Component and Load for Nonstructural Element

건축 비구조재의 내진설계요소 및 내진설계하중에 관한 고찰

  • 최인섭 (연세대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 이주희 (연세대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 손정훈 (연세대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김준희 (연세대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2018.11.14
  • Accepted : 2019.05.08
  • Published : 2019.05.30

Abstract

Nonstructural elements are installed according to the function of a building, and refer to the elements other than a structural system that resists external loads. Although the nonstructural elements had the largest part of seismic loss of buildings, seismic design of buildings mainly focuses on structural system and the seismic design of nonstructural elements are rarely conducted. In this study, the seismic design provisions of nonstructural elements presented in Uniform Building Code (UBC) and International Building Code (IBC) were investigated in order to analyze the seismic design considerations of nonstructural elements presented in Korean Building Code (KBC). The results showed that the equivalent static load applied to seismic design of nonstructural elements was revised to take into consideration a total of five items such as effective ground acceleration, vertical amplification factor, response amplification factor, response modification factor, importance factor.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단, 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)

References

  1. AIK (2016). Korean Building Code and Commentary (KBC 2016). The Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  2. ASCE (2014). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Building (ASCE/SEI 41-13). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  3. ASCE (2016). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-16). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  4. ATC (1984). Amended: Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulation for Buildings (ATC 3-06). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  5. Ayres, J.M., Sun, T.Y., & Brown, F.R. (1967). A Report on Non-Structural Damage to Building - Alaska Earthquake, March 27, 1964, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
  6. Ayres, J.M. & Sun, T.Y. (1973). Nonstructural Damage, The San Fernando, California Earthquake of February 9, 1971, National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration, 1B1(B), Washington, D.C.
  7. Chang, K. K., Lim, Y. C., & Seo, D. W. (2013). Comparison of Building Code for Design of Non-structural Elements for Buildings. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction 29(1), 23-30 https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2013.29.1.23
  8. Chen, M. C., Pantoli, E., Wang, X., Astroza, R., Ebrahimian, H., Hutchinson, T. C., & Bachman, R. E. (2016). Full-scale Structural and Nonstructural Building System Performance during Earthquakes: Part I-Specimen Description, Test Protocol, and Structural Response. Earthquake Spectra, 32(2), 737-770. https://doi.org/10.1193/012414EQS016M
  9. Diebold, J., Moore, K., Hale, T., & Mochizuki, G. (2008). SEAOC Blue Book: Seismic Design Recommendations 1959 to 2008. In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
  10. Fathali, S., & Lizundia, B. (2011). Evaluation of Current Seismic Design Equations for Nonstructural Components in Tall Buildings using Strong Motion Records. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20(S1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.736
  11. Fathali, S., & Lizundia, B. (2012). Evaluation of ASCE/SEI 7 Equations for Seismic Design of Nonstructural Components using CSMIP Records. In Proceedings of SMIP12 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data, Sacramento, California.
  12. FEMA (1985). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Part 1: Provisions (FEMA 95), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  13. FEMA (1995). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, 1994 Edition, Part 1: Provisions (FEMA 222A), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  14. FEMA (1998). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, 1997 Edition, Part 1: Provisions (FEMA 302), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  15. FEMA (2001). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, 2000 Edition, Part 1: Provisions (FEMA 368), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  16. FEMA (2015). Performance of Buildings and Nonstructural Components in the 2014 South Napa Earthquake (FEMA P-1024), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  17. ICBO (1927). Uniform Building Code (UBC 1927), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  18. ICBO (1935). Uniform Building Code (UBC 1935), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  19. ICBO (1961). Uniform Building Code (UBC 1961), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  20. ICBO (1976). Uniform Building Code (UBC 1976), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  21. ICBO (1979). Uniform Building Code (UBC 1979), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  22. ICBO (1997). Uniform Building Code (UBC 1997), International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  23. ICC (2000). International Building Code (IBC 2000), International Code Council, Washington, D.C.
  24. ICC (2015). International Building Code (IBC 2015), International Code Council, Washington, D.C.
  25. Kim, D. K. (2014). KBC Seismic Design Force for Nonstructural Element. Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures 14(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.9712/KASS.2014.14.1.077
  26. Kim, D. H., Choi, I. S., & Kim, J. H. (2016). Behavior Analysis of Existing Concrete Members in accordance with the Load Distribution Ratio of Compression Members During Remodeling. In Proceedings of the 2016 Fall Conference on Architectural Institute of Korea 36(2), 790-791.
  27. Lee, H. S. (2004). Earthquake Load and Structural System in Seismic Codes. In Proceedings of the 2004 Workshop of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 349-360.
  28. Lee, S. H., Cho, T. G., Lim, H. T., & Choi, B. J. (2016). Damage of Gyeongju 9.12 Earthquakes and Seismic Design Criteria for Nonstructural Elements. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea 13(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2009.13.1.009
  29. Lew, H. S., Leyendecker, E. V., & Dikkers, R. D. (1971). Engineering Aspects of the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake, Building Science Series 40, U.S. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
  30. Mohammadi, R. K., & Mohammadi, M (2012). Estimating floor acceleration in nonlinear multi-story moment-resisting frames. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal.
  31. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2017). 9.12 Earthquake White Book.
  32. Miranda, E., & Aslani, H. (2003). Probabilistic Response Assessment for Building-Specific Loss Estimation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  33. OSHPD (1996). 1994 Northridge Hospital Damage: OSHPD Studies: Water, Elevator, Nonstructural, Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, Division of Facilities Development, Sacramento, Californ
  34. Ray-Chaudhuri, S., & Hutchinson, T. C. (2011). Effect of Nonlinearity of Frame Buildings on Peak Horizontal Floor Acceleration. Journal of earthquake engineering, 15(1), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632461003668046
  35. Rihal, S. (1994). Correlation Between Recorded Building Data and Non-Structural Damage During the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake, Data Utilization Report CSMIP/94-04, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, Sacramento, California.
  36. Shin, J., Jeon, J. S., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Mainshock-Aftershock Response Analyses of FRP-Jacketed Columns in Existing RC Building Frames. Engineering Structures, 165, 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.017