DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adoption of Mobile Peer-to-Peer Payment: Enabling Role of Substitution and Social Aspects

  • Received : 2019.02.24
  • Accepted : 2019.06.04
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Despite the growing amount of mobile peer-to-peer (P2P) payment applications available on mobile app stores, these applications are still in their infancy and have yet to see mass adoption. This study aims to explore the factors that influence the adoption of such mobile P2P payment applications by using a large-scale data set based on the tracking of users' actual mobile application usage behavior. Our main findings reveal that the duration of each session that users use of traditional bank application has a significant relationship with their adoption of mobile P2P payment applications. In addition, we explore the social aspect of such mobile P2P payment applications by analyzing their social network applications usage and found that the amount of social network service applications used and usage duration positively impacted one's adoption of mobile P2P payment applications. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications for stakeholders of mobile P2P payment solution providers as well as intermediaries/banks who provide their own payment applications to their customers.

Keywords

References

  1. Acker, A., and Murthy, D. (2018). Venmo: Understanding mobile payments as social media. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Media & Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  2. Agarwal, R., and Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
  3. Allison, P. (2012). Logistic regression for rare events. Retrieved 27/08, 2018, from https://statisticalhorizons.com/logistic-regression-for-rare-events
  4. Au, Y. A., and Kauffman, R. J. (2006). The economics of mobile payments: Understanding stakeholder issues for an emerging financial technology application. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 141-164.
  5. Bigne, E., Ruiz, C., and Sanz-Balz, S. (2007). Key drivers of mobile commerce adoption: An exploratory study of spanish mobile users. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer2020013
  6. Black, T., Brodsky, L., and Mole, K. (2016). Cooperation and Competition in the us P2P market. McKinsey&Company.
  7. Business Insider. (2017). Digital peer-to-peer payments are the new norm. Retrieved 08/10/18, 2018, from https://www.businessinsider.com/digital-p2p-payments-are-the-new-norm-2017-8
  8. Chen, L.-D. (2006). A theoretical model of consumer acceptance of Mpayment. Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico, p. 247.
  9. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., and Zuniga, H. G. D. (2010). Who interacts on the web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
  10. D'Onfro, J. (2015). Venmo's 'secret sauce' keeps users checking the app even when they're not making payments. Business Insider.
  11. Dahlberg, T., Guo, J., and Ondrus, J. (2015). A critical review of mobile payment research. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(5), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2015.07.006
  12. Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., and Zmijewska, A. (2008). Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.02.001
  13. Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., and Oorni, A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of mobile payment solutions: Ease of use, usefulness and trust. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Mobile Business, Vienna, Austria.
  14. Elgmati, E., Fiaccone, R., Henderson, R., and Matthews, J. (2015). Penalised logistic regression and dynamic prediction for discrete time recurrent event data. Lifetime Data Analysis, 21(4), 542-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-015-9321-4
  15. eMarketer. (2018). E-commerce is up and poised for further growth. Retrieved 08/10/18, 2018, from https://www.statista.com/chart/13139/estimated-worldwide-mobile-e-commerce-sales/
  16. Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
  17. Fitzgerald, K. (2018). Data: digital P2p payments' problems. Retrieved 24/08, 2018, from https://www.paymentssource.com/slideshow/data-digital-p2p-payments-problems
  18. Green, R. (2017). Digital P2p payments are the new norm. Business Insider.
  19. Greenland, S., and Mansournia, M. A. (2015). Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions. Statistics In Medicine, 34(23), 3133-3143. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6537
  20. Gu, J.-C., Lee, S.-C., and Suh, Y.-H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605-11616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024
  21. Heggestuen, J. (2014). The peer-to-peer payments report: The exploding market for smartphone apps that transfer money. Business Insider.
  22. Heinze, G., and Schemper, M. (2002). A solution to the problem of seperation in logistic regression. Statistics In Medicine, 21, 2409-2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047
  23. Hwong, C. (2017). Chart of the week: Who's using which mobile payment apps? Retrieved 2/3/2018, 2018, from http://www.vertoanalytics.com/chartweek-mobile-payment-apps/
  24. Jain, G. (2014). Shifting the spotlight on mobile payments in emerging markets. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 8(3), 246-253.
  25. Kazan, E., and Damsgaard, J. (2013). A framework for analyzing digital payment as a multi-sided platform: A study of three european Nfc solutions. European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  26. Kim, G., Shin, B., and Lee, H. G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00269.x
  27. King, G., and Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868
  28. Konidala, D. M., Dwijaksara, M. H., Kim, K., Lee, D., Lee, B., and Kim, D. (2011). Resuscitating privacy-preserving mobile payment with customer in complete control. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(6), 643-654.
  29. Kookmin Bank. (2018). Kb vitamin of knowledge: Toss report. Kookmin Bank.
  30. Koren, J. R. (2017). As millennials 'venmo' each other money, banks fight back with their own mobile apps. Los Angeles Times.
  31. Kshetri, N., and Acharya, S. (2012). Mobile payments in emerging markets. IT Professional, 14(4), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2012.82
  32. Lin, H.-F. (2011). An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.006
  33. Lin, K.-Y., and Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
  34. Mbiti, I., and Weil, D. N. (2011). Mobile banking: The impact of M-Pesa in Kenya. NBER Working Paper, p.17129.
  35. Mercator. (2018). U.S. Consumers and debit: shift to online may inhibit use. Mercator's Advisory group.
  36. Mobeewave. (2016). Solving the problem of strangers and peer-to-peer payment. Mobeewave, November 10, 2016. Retrieved from: https://mobeewave.com/en/2016/11/10/solving-the-problem-of-strangers-and-peer-to-peer-payment/.
  37. Molinda, B. (2017). No more ious: These apps let you pay your friends. USA Today.
  38. Morawczynski, O. (2009). Exploring the usage and impact of "transformational" mobile financial services: The case of M-Pesa in Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 3(3), 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531050903273768
  39. Morawczynski, O., and Pickens, M. (2009). Poor people using mobile financial services: Observations on customer usage and impact from M-Pesa.
  40. Nath, T. (2017). How safe is venmo and why is it free? Retrieved 2/15/18, 2018, from https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/032415/how-safe-venmo-and-why-it-free.asp
  41. Ondrus, J., and Pigneur, Y. (2005). A disruption analysis in the mobile payment market. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 84-84.
  42. Ondrus, J., and Pigneur, Y. (2009). Near field communication: An assessment for future payment systems. Information Systems & E-business Management, 7(3), 347-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-008-0093-1
  43. Ou, C.-M., and Ou, C. R. (2007). Adaptation of proxy certificates to non-repudiation protocol of agent-based mobile payment systems. Applied Intelligence, 30(3), 233-243.
  44. Perez, S. (2017). Zelle, the real-time venmo competitor backed by over 30 U.S. banks, arrives this month. Retrieved 1/4/18, 2018, from https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/12/zelle-the-real-time-venmo-competitor-backed-by-over-30-u-s-banks-arrives-this-month/
  45. Russell, J. (2017). Korea's top financial services startup lands $48m from paypal and others. Retrieved 2/1/17, 2018, from https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/09/vivarepublica-toss-korea-paypal-goodwater-capital-48-million/
  46. Schildbach, J. (2017). Large or small? how to measure bank size. Deutsche Bank Research.
  47. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009
  48. Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C., and Williams, M. D. (2015). Modeling consumers' adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the united kingdom: Extending utaut with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860-873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20823
  49. TSYS (2016). 2016 U.K. M-payment and P2p payment consumer study. TSYS.
  50. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
  51. Venmo. (2018). How it works. Retrieved 2/15/18, 2018, from https://venmo.com/about/product/
  52. Vishwanath, A. (2005). Impact of personality on technology adoption: An empirical model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 803-811. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20169
  53. Wang, S. (2017). South Korean banks rely on fintech as they contest for dominance in digital retail banking. The Asian Banker.
  54. Xu, R., Frey, R. M., Fleisch, E., and Llic, A. (2016). Understanding the impact of personality traits on mobile app adoption: Insights from a large-scale field study. Computers in human Behavior, 62, 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.011
  55. Zelle. (2018). Early warning digital payments adoption. Zelle.