DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Organizational Factors Influencing Inclination to Use a B2B Website by a Buyer-Supplier Dyad: The Indian Context

  • Received : 2018.10.31
  • Accepted : 2019.04.19
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Business-to-Business electronic commerce websites are a common form of inter-organizational systems that span organizational boundaries and enables organizations to exchange information in a seamless fashion. To reap the desired benefits it is important that the website be used in the intended manner. The level and extent of use of a business-to-business website depends partly on the inclination to use the website by the users in the primary organization and in the user organizations independently and the combined inclination of the organizations together. This combined inclination is referred to as the System Inclination, with dominance playing a key role. Each organization has certain characteristics of its own and may differ significantly in their inclination to use. It is important to analyze the factors that determine this inclination to use, so that organizations can adopt appropriate management mechanisms to control it. This paper proposes a framework to explain the organizational factors and their influence on the inclination to use a website, based on study of four Indian buyer-supplier dyads. Inclination to use is found to be influenced by factors like top management support, website characteristics, adequate support mechanisms, user group orientation towards electronic commerce and basic IT drive among the employees, at both the primary and user organizations.

Keywords

References

  1. Alsaad, A., Mohamad, R., and Ismail, N. A. (2017). The moderating role of trust in business to business electronic commerce (B2B EC) adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.040
  2. Arun, T. (2013). Determinants of customers' online purchase intention: an empirical study in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 5(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554191311303367
  3. Asghar A. J., and Stephen, X. Z. (2013). E-commerce for SMEs: empirical insights from three countries. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(4), 849-865. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2012-0039
  4. Babita, S. (2014). E-Commerce in India. The International Journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 202-234.
  5. Beath, C. M. (1991). Supporting the Information Technology Champion. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 15(3), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.2307/249647
  6. Bermudez, G. M. T., G-Bustelo, B. C. P., Martinez, O. S., Alvarez, B. T., and Rojas, L. A. R. (2014). Reverse electronic auction web tool for B2B. Computers in Industry, 65(5), 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2013.12.008
  7. Chen, L., and Holsapple, C. W. (2013). E-business adoption research: State of the art. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14(3), 261.
  8. Chi, T. (2018). Mobile Commerce Website Success: Antecedents of Consumer Satisfaction and Purchase Intention. Journal of Internet Commerce, 17(3), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2018.1451970
  9. Chong, W. K., Shafaghi, M., and Tan, B. L. (2011). Development of a business-to-business critical success factors (B2B CSFs) framework for Chinese SMEs. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 29(5), 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501111153700
  10. Cortez, R. M., and Johnston, W. J. (2017). The future of B2B marketing theory: A historical and prospective analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.07.017
  11. Daft, R. L. (1978). A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), https://doi.org/10.5465/255754
  12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  13. Dewar, R. D., and Dutton, J. E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science, 32, 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
  14. DMA (2013). Statistical Factbook. Direct Marketing Association, New York.
  15. Elling, S., Lentz, L., de Jong, M., and van den Bergh, H. (2012). Measuring the quality of governmental websites in a controlled versus an online setting with the 'website evaluation questionnaire'. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.11.004
  16. Emerson, R. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716
  17. Galleta, D., Henry, R., McCoy, S., and Polak, P., (2004): Web site delays: How Tolerant are users? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00044
  18. Gallivan, M. J., and Depledge, G. (2003). Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships. Information Systems Journal, 13(2), 159-190. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00146.x
  19. Gharib, R. K., Philpott, E., and Duan, Y. (2017). Factors affecting active participation in B2B online communities: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 54(4), 516-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.004
  20. Grover, V., and Saeed, K. A. (2007). The Impact of Product, Market, and Relationship Characteristics on Interorganizational System Integration in Manufacturer Supplier Dyads. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230409
  21. Hallikainen, H., and Laukkanen, T. (2018). National culture and consumer trust in e-commerce. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.002
  22. Hart, P., and Saunders, C. (1997). Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange. Organization Science, 8(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.1.23
  23. Hoekstra, J., Huizingh, K., Bijmolt, T., and Krawczyk, A. (2015). Providing information and enabling transactions: which website function is more important for success? Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(2), 81-94.
  24. Hoque, M. R., Ali, M. A., and Mahfuz, M. A. (2015). An Empirical Investigation on the Adoption of E-Commerce in Bangladesh. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 10.14329/apjis.2015.25.1.001.
  25. https://www.export.gov/article?id=India-e-Commerce
  26. Iankova, S., Davies, I., Archer-Brown, C., Marder, B., and Yau, A. (2018). A comparison of social media marketing between B2B, B2C and mixed business models. Industrial Marketing Management, 81, 169-179.
  27. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., and Davis, G. B. (1995). Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518061
  28. In-depth: B2B e-Commerce 2019, Statista Digital Market Outlook - Trend Report
  29. Janita, I., and Chong, W. K. (2013). Barriers of B2B e-Business Adoption in Indonesian SMEs: A Literature Analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 571-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.073
  30. Johnson, M. (2013). Critical success factors for B2B e-markets: A strategic fit perspective. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(4), 337-366. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501311324843
  31. Kang, K., Kim, Y. J., and Shin, S. (2013). Why Do Customers Purchase from a Website? Activity-based Web Presence Readiness Model. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2013.23.4.085
  32. Kim, J. B. (2012). An empirical study on consumer first purchase intention in online shopping: integrating initial trust and TAM. Electronic Commerce Research, 12, 125-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9089-5
  33. Kim, J., Kim, M., Shin, S., and Song, J. (2017). The Influences of Mobile Channel Configurations on Channel Integration Quality in Cross-Channel Electronic Commerce. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2017.27.1.18
  34. Kim, S., and Lee, Y. (2006). Global online marketplace: a cross-cultural comparison of website quality. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00522.x
  35. Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308-324. https://doi.org/10.2307/259084
  36. Kuan, H. H., Bock, G.W., and Vathanophas, V. (2008). Comparing the effects of website quality on customer initial purchase and continued purchase at e-commerce websites. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290600801959
  37. Lai, V. S., and Li, H. (2005). Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis. Information & Management, 42(2), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.007
  38. Lee, J., and Pee, L. G. (2015). The Relationship between Online Trust and Distrust in Business: Testing Mutual Causality from a Cognitive-Affective Personality System Theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 500-518. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2015.25.3.500
  39. Lee, Y., and Kozar, K. A. (2012). Understanding of website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.004
  40. Lilien, G. L. (2016). The B2B Knowledge Gap. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(3), 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.003
  41. Lip-Sam, T., and Hock-Eam, L. (2011). Estimating The Determinants Of B2B E-Commerce Adoption Among Small & Medium Enterprises. International Journal of Business and Society, 12, 15-30.
  42. Liu C., Marchewk, Lu J., and Yu, C. Z. (2005). Beyond concern-a privacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 42, 289-304.
  43. Michael, A. (2014). Electronic commerce adoption, entrepreneurial orientation and small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) performance. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(1), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2013-0145
  44. Mohtaramzadeh, M., Ramayah, T., Jun-Hwa, C. (2018). B2B E-Commerce Adoption in Iranian Manufacturing Companies: Analyzing the Moderating Role of Organizational Culture. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 621-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1385212
  45. Monideepa, T., and Vaidya, S. D. (2006). Challenges in the adoption of E-Commerce technologies in India: The role of organizational factors. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 428-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.08.001
  46. Oliveira, T., and Martin, M. F. (2010). Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(9), 1337-1354. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011087428
  47. Qu, W. G., Pinsonneault, A., Tomiuk, D., Wang, S., and Liu, Y. (2015). The impacts of social trust on open and closed B2B e-commerce: A Europe-based study. Information & Management, 52(2), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.07.002
  48. Rahim, M. M., Shanks, G., and Johnston, R. B. (2011). A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities. Electronic Commerce Research, 11, 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9
  49. Saade, R., and Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
  50. Sila, I. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of B2B e-commerce technologies. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 199-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9110-7
  51. Thitimajshima, W., Esichaikul, V., and Krairit, D. (2018). A framework to identify factors affecting the performance of third-party B2B e-marketplaces: A seller's perspective. Electronic Markets, 28, 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0256-3
  52. Vize, R. Coughlan, J., Kennedy, A., and Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2013). Technology readiness in a B2B online retail context: An examination of antecedents and outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(6), 909-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.020
  53. Wakefield, R. L., Wakefield, K. L., Baker, J., and Wang, L. C. (2011). How website socialness leads to website use. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.47
  54. Wang, S., and Cavusoglu, H. (2015). Small and medium sized manufacturer performance on third party B2B electronic marketplaces: The role of enabling and IT capabilities. Decision Support Systems, 79, 184-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.006
  55. Wiersema, F. (2013). The B2B Agenda: The current state of B2B marketing and a look ahead. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 470-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.015
  56. Yang Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., and Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals. Information & Management, 42, 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(04)00073-4
  57. Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
  58. Yu, S., Hudders, L., and Cauberghe, V. (2018). Selling luxury products online: The effect of a quality label on risk perception, purchase intention and attitude toward the brand. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 16-35.
  59. Zain, M., Rose, R. C., Abdullah, I., and Masrom, M. (2005). The Relationship Between Information Technology Acceptance And Organizational Agility In Malaysia. Information & Management, 42(6), 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.09.001
  60. Zhao, J., Wang, S., and Huang, W. V. (2008). A study of B2B e-market in China: E-commerce process perspective. Information & Management, 45(4), 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.01.007
  61. Zmud, R. W. (1982). Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and formalization. Management Science, 28, 1421-1431. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421