DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Global Corporate Citizenship: Cross-cultural Comparison of Best Practices in the Global Automotive Industry

  • Lee, Jung Wan (Administrative Sciences Department, Metropolitan College, Boston University) ;
  • Tan, Wie Nie (Administrative Sciences Department, Metropolitan College, Boston University)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.30
  • 심사 : 2018.09.30
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28

초록

The study aims to investigate corporate social responsibility (CSR) best practices of the world automotive industry - Peugeot, BMW, Ford, Hyundai and Toyota among others - and recommend that they plan their business strategies and managerial responses accordingly. Based on the comparative research and case studies, this research finds that all five automobile manufacturers have taken very similar measures and actions in order to establish and maintain a high level of CSR practices. Sustainability was a core value in all five companies and served as a guiding principle in every aspect and approach of their business. This study finds that all five companies have CSR strategies in place to increase energy efficiency as well as reduce the usage and wastage of water in their production and plants. This research also finds that all companies monitor their suppliers and their own production process to ensure that they maintain their CSR standards. More impressively, this sustainable management practice is transferred along the companies' supply chain through education and training. Their suppliers and business partners are closely monitored to make sure that their high CSR standards are respected and followed. However, we find that there also are some differences in terms of their CSR deliveries and activities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aaronson, S. A. (2001). Oh, Behave! The International Economy, 15(2), 40-47.
  2. Altman, B. W., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2000). A Framework for Understanding Corporate Citizenship: Introduction to the Special Edition of Business and Society Review "Corporate Citizenship for the New Millenium". Business and Society Review, 105(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00061
  3. Anderson, R. J. (2009). Toward Global Corporate Citizenship: Reframing Foreign Direct Investment Law. Michigan State Journal of International Law, 18(1), 1-30.
  4. Baumann-Pauly, D., & Scherer, A. G. (2013). The Organizational Implementation of Corporate Citizenship: An Assessment Tool and its Application at UN Global Compact Participants. Journal of Business Ethic, 117, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1502-4
  5. Bhardwaj, P., Chatterjee, P., Demir, K. D., & Turut, O. (2018). When and How Is Corporate Social Responsibility Profitable? Journal of Business Research, 84, 206-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.026
  6. BMW Group. (2018). Sustainable Value Report 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2018 from https://www.bmwgroup.com/content/dam/bmw-group-websites/bmwgroup_com/ir/downloads/en/2017/BMW-Group-SustainableValueReport-2017--EN.pdf
  7. Boyle, M.-E., & Boguslaw, J. (2007). Business, Poverty and Corporate Citizenship: Naming the Issues and Framing Solutions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 26, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2007.su.00013
  8. Capriotti, P., & Moreno, A. (2007). Corporate Citizenship and Public Relations: The Importance and Interactivity of Social Responsibility Issues on Corporate Websites. Public Relations Review, 33, 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.012
  9. Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F., Pinney, C. C., & Pitt, L. F. (2011). Implementing Global Corporate Citizenship: An Integrated Business Framework. Business Horizons, 54, 447-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.04.006
  10. Darigan, K. H., & Post, J. E. (2009). Corporate Citizenship in China: CSR Challenges in the "Harmonious Society". The Journal of Corporate Citizenshi, 35, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2009.au.00005
  11. Deva, S. (2006). Global Compact: A Critique Of The U.N.'s "Public-Private" Partnership for Promoting Corporate Citizenship. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34(1), 107-151.
  12. Ecks, S. (2008). Global Pharmaceutical Markets and Corporate Citizenship: The Case of Novartis' Anti-cancer Drug Glivec. BioSocieties, 3, 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855208006091
  13. Financier Worldwide. (2015). The Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved April 28, 2018 from https://www.financierworldwide.com/the-importance-ofcorporate-social-responsibility/#.WPJaGdIrKJB
  14. Ford. (2018). Sustainability Report 2016/2017. Retrieved April 28, 2018 from https://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2016-17/doc/sr16.pdf
  15. Harris, A. (2017). The Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility for Your Business' Image. KCD PR. Retrieved April 15, 2017 from http://www.kcdpr.com/theimportance-of-corporate-social-responsibility-for-yourbusiness-image/
  16. Hemphill, T. (2010). The "Creative Capitalism" Corporate Governance Model: How Radical an Approach to Modern Capitalism? International Journal of Law and Management, 52(2), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431011029415
  17. Hemphill, T. A. (2004). Monitoring Global Corporate Citizenship: Industry Self-regulation at a Crossroads. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2004.su.00009
  18. Hoivik, H. V., & Mele, D. (2009). Can an SME Become a Global Corporate Citizen? Evidence from a Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0123-z
  19. Holcomb, J. M. (2003). Corporate Global Citizenship: Conflicts between Human Rights and Power Politics. Business & Professional Ethics Journa, 22(2), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej20032224
  20. Hyundai. (2018). CSR Report 2016. Retrieved April 28, 2018, from https://www.hyundai.co.kr/MediaCenter/CSRLibrary/White-Paper.hub
  21. Kimbro, M. B., & Cao, Z. (2011). Does Voluntary Corporate Citizenship Pay? An Examination of the UN Global Compact. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 19(3), 288-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/18347641111169278
  22. Logan, D. (1998). Corporate Citizenship in a Global Age. RSA Journal, 146(5486), 64-71.
  23. Mirvis, P., & Googins, B. (2006). Stages of Corporate Citizenship. California Management Review, 48(2), 104-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166340
  24. Pies, I., Beckmann, M., & Hielscher, S. (2010). Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0263-1
  25. Post, J. E. (2000). Moving from Geographic to Virtual Communities: Global Corporate Citizenship in a Dot.com World. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 27-46.
  26. Post, J. E. (2002). Global Corporate Citizenship: Principles to Live and Work by. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857808
  27. Prasad, B. C. (2004). Globalisation, Free Trade and Corporate Citizenship in Pacific Forum Island Countries: How Relevant Is the United Nations Global Compact. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2004.sp.00009
  28. Prinsloo, P., Beukes, C., & Jongh, D. D. (2006). Corporate Citizenship Education for Responsible Business Leaders. Development Southern Africa, 23(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350600707868
  29. PSA Groupe. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2018 from http://interactivedocument.labrador-company.com/Labrad or /EN/PSA/2017csrreport/
  30. Rahman, M. U., & Rahman, M. U. (2016). Corporate Citizenship Consideration at IMCL: A Case Study. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 5(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977916634239
  31. Sadler, D., & Lloyd, S. (2009). Neo-liberalising Corporate Social Responsibility: A Political Economy of Corporate Citizenship. Geoforum, 40, 613-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.03.008
  32. Scherer, A. G., Baumann-Pauly, D., & Schneider, A. (2012). Democratizing Corporate Governance: Compensating for the Democratic Deficit of Corporate Political Activity and Corporate Citizenship. Business & Society, 52(3), 473-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312446931
  33. Schrempf-Stirling, J., Palazzo, G., & Phillips, R. A. (2016). Historic Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 700-719. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0137
  34. Schwittay, A. (2009). Taking Prahalad High-Tech: The Emergence and Evolution of Global Corporate Citizenship in the IT Industry. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 33, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2009.sp.00011
  35. Shinkle, G. A., & Spencer, J. W. (2012). The Social Construction of Global Corporate Citizenship: Sustainability Reports of Automotive Corporations. Journal of World Business, 47, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.02.003
  36. Tiwari, A., Turner, C., & Younis, K. (2014). Socially Responsible Purchasing in the Automotive Industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 620-645. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2012-0056
  37. Toyota Global. (2018). Annual Report 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2018 from http://www.toyota-global.com/pages/contents/investors/ir_library/annual/pdf/2017/annual_report_2017_fie.pdf
  38. Veleva, V. R. (2010). Managing Corporate Citizenship: A New Tool for Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.206
  39. Vyas, V., & Raitani, S. (2015). An Examination of Linkages between CSR and Cross-buying. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 622-640. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2014-0118
  40. Waddock, S., & Smith, N. (2000). Relationships: The Real Challenge of Corporate Global Citizenship. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00064
  41. Whitehouse, L. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship and the Global Compact: A New Approach to Regulating Corporate Social Power? Global Social Policy, 3(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181030033002

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of CSR Activities on Business Performance of Logistics Firms vol.17, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.12.201912.23
  2. Forecasting the Environmental, Social, and Governance Rating of Firms by Using Corporate Financial Performance Variables: A Rough Set Approach vol.12, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083324
  3. Green Supply Chain Management in Vietnam Industrial Zone: Province-Level Evidence vol.7, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.403
  4. Industrial Growth and Environmental Resource toward the Tax Potential: A Case Study in South Sulawesi Province vol.7, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.201
  5. Fair Competition: The Concept of Regulation in the Sharing Economy vol.7, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.637
  6. Multi-regional land disturbances induced by mineral use in a product-based approach: A case study of gasoline, hybrid, battery electric and fuel cell vehicle production in Japan vol.178, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106093