한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제10권5호
  • /
  • Pages.257-266
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지체장애인 배우자에 대한 자문화기술지 연구

The Autoethnography Study on the My Partner with Physical Disabilities

  • 이도희 (충남대학교 경상대학 경영학부)
  • Lee, Doh Hee (School of Business Administration, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.12
  • 심사 : 2019.05.20
  • 발행 : 2019.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 나 자신과 나와 함께 하는 지체장애를 갖고 있는 배우자(disable partner)와의 생활에서의 경험에 대한 자문화기술지연구를 시도하였다. '자문화기술지(autoethnography)'는 개인적이고 주관적인 삶을 자서전(auto biography)적으로 기술하는 방법이다. 분석결과, 다음과 같이 4개의 시기로 구분하여 연구자 자신에 대한 내러티브 형식으로 기술하였다. 첫 번째 시기, '영원할 것 같았던 싱글라이프'의 시기로 정의하였다. 두 번째 시기는 '성모의 마을'이라는 장애인시설의 만남으로 장애인과의 생활 속에서 장애인에 대한 이해와 약속을 수행하였다. 세 번째 시기는 지체장애인 배우자와의 만남과 그와의 생활의 시기이다. 마지막 시기로 지체장애인 배우자에 대한 이해와 노력의 시기이다. 질적연구는 사회적 또는 인간의 문제를 탐구하는 독특한 방법론적 연구전통에 기반하여 이해해야 하는 연구과정이다. 따라서, 연구자는 복합적이고 전체적인 그림을 구축 및 보고하고, 이러한 과정들이 자연스러운 상황에서 연구가 수행되어야 한다. 이에 향후 연구에서는 더욱 분석적이며 체계적인 연구로의 확장을 기대한다.

This study has attempted to study self-cultural skills about my experience in life with a spouse with a physical disability with myself. The 'autoethnography' is a combination of an autobiography describing a personal and subjective life and a ethnography that studies the culture of a social group, and it is a way of expressing self-narrative experiences and experiences related to the context or context of a social group. The analysis showed that the researcher divided into three periods, one for the researcher himself, and defined the first for 'the single life that seemed to last forever'. The second period was the meeting of the disabled facility called 'The Village of the Virgin Mary'. The Third period is the time of meeting with the disabled partner and the life with him, and it is the time to experience a spouse with a rather sensitive disability. Last, it's the time of understanding and effort for my physical disability partner. Qualitative research is a research process that must be understood based on a unique methodological research tradition that explores social or human problems. And, we expect to expand into more analytical and systematic research in future research.

키워드

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_257_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Analysis Process : “Journey of My Life”

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_257_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Sungmo’ Maeul(the Social Welfare Foundation)

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_257_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Social Welfare Master's Thesis

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_257_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Just, Now 1

OHHGBW_2019_v10n5_257_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Just, Now 2

참고문헌

  1. Welfare Act for Disabled, Law no.15270 & Enforcement Ordinance no. 28979
  2. National Law Information Center(www.law.go.kr)
  3. H. Chang. (2008). Autoethnography as method, 1, Walnut Creek, Left Coast Press, Inc.
  4. B. S. Kang. (2017). An Autoethnography on the Teaching Experience of a Professional Golfer in Golf College, Anthropology of Education, 20(1), 173-203. (DOI:https://doi.org/10.17318/jae.2017.20.1.006)
  5. K. S. Lee. (2016). Das Sprechen der Sprache und das Entsprechen Heideggers, Researches in Contemporary European Philosophy, 13, 5-42.
  6. J. Y. Lee. (2006). Possible Selves of University Students in Korea: Expected Selves and Feared Selves, Korea Journal of Counseling, 7(4), 1055-1070. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17318/jae.2010.13.1.006
  7. M. Hayler. (2011). Autoethnography, self-narrative and teacher education. Studies in Professional Life and Work, 5). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  8. N. I. Lee. (2006). E. Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology and E. Levinas's Phenomenology of the Other, Research in Philosophy and Phenomenology, 28, 1-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7761/9789731997643_7
  9. S. Wall. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an auto/ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103
  10. H. K. Cho. (2012). A Consoderation on Life-world and doing-Philosophy : Focus on Understanding of Philosophy in Heidegger and Jong-hong Park, Philosophies and Culture, 24, 163-187. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v5i1.93
  11. M. A. Whisman, N. Olejko, & Y. Chatav. (2007). T Social consequences of personality disorders: probability and timing of marriage and probability of marital disruption. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(6), 690-695. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.6.690
  12. S. Y. Pak, H. W. Chang & M. N. Cho. (2010). Autoethnography : Exploration of its value as a research methodology in anthropology and education, Anthropology of Education, 13(2), 55-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17318/jae.2010.13.1.006
  13. H. S. Lee. (2014). Everyday Life Fifficulties of Persons with Fisabilities on Quality(CQR) research, Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(12), 561-570. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2014.12.12.561
  14. J. D. Kim. (2010). Family Adaptability of Parents and Sibling of Children with Developmental Disabilities: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Coping Strategies, Doctoral Thesis of Chungnam Natinal University.
  15. M. Mayan.(2009). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  16. D. H. Lee & S. Y. Kim. (2016), The Subjectivity Study on the Business Ethics Perception, Korea International Accounting Review, 66, 219-244. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21073/kiar.2016..66.010
  17. G. W. Suh & M. J. Lee. (2017). Qualitative Transition to Qualitative Research: The Case of a Narrative Identity Research, Anthropology of Education, 20(4), 1-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117706869
  18. J. W. Creswell. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks. CA:Sage.
  19. R. S. Jang & M. S. Na. (2017), A Qualitative Study on Women's Daily Lives and Smartphone Use: Focusing on Interviews with Chinese Women in their Twenties, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(10), 467-483. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.467
  20. M. J. Kwon. (2015). Study on the Experience of Spouses Care Giving their Husband with Spinal Cord Injuries, Social Science Studies. 39(2), 145-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33071/ssricb.39.2.201508.145
  21. B. G. Jeong & J. H. Kim. (2016). Experience of Marriage Maintenance among Spouses of the mentally Disabled Women, Korean Journal of Family Social Work, 52, 167-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/africatoday.62.3.111
  22. J. K. Yoo & H. K. Chong. (2018). A Case Study on Experiences of Spouse Caregivers of ALS Patients, Journal of Disability and Welfare. 40, 151-178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526125774.00011
  23. S. Wall. (2006). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146-160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500205
  24. M. Mendez. (2013). Auto-ethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms. Colombia Applied Linguistic Journal, 15(2), 279-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.2.a09
  25. K. G. Heider. (1975). What do people do? Dani auto-ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research, 3, 17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.31.1.3629504
  26. D. Reed Danahay. (1997). Auto/ethnography. New York: Berg.
  27. C. S. Ellis & A. Bochner. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage.
  28. D. M.. Hayano. (1979). Autoethnography: paradigms, problems and prospects. Human Organization, 38, 113-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v
  29. D. S. Lee. (2012). Autoethnography & Qualitative Research, Paju:Academy Press.
  30. Denzin. (2010). Action vs. interaction Society 9, 50-53.1973. DOI: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
  31. M. Duncan. (2004). Autoethnography: Critical Appreciation of an Emerging Art.
  32. A. C. Sparkes. (2000). Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 21-43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.17.1.21
  33. S. Belbase. (2017). Autoethnography of "My Autoethnography", Shashidhar Belbase, 1-20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201708.0027.v1
  34. www.dic.daum.net
  35. D. H. Lee. (2018). Let's Think about My Partner: Using the Subjective Study, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(3), 320-329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201803.001112
  36. S. H. Choi. (2008). Let's learn my Partner, K. G. Press.