Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe

  • Verra, Sanne E. (Policy Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge) ;
  • Benzerga, Amel (Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health) ;
  • Jiao, Boshen (Global Research Analytics for Population Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health) ;
  • Ruggeri, Kai (Policy Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge)
  • Received : 2017.12.26
  • Accepted : 2018.07.19
  • Published : 2019.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Promoting healthy lifestyles at work should complement workplace safety programs. This study systematically investigates current states of occupational health and safety (OHS) policy as well as practice in the European Union (EU). Methods: OHS policies of EU member states were categorized as either prevention or health promotion provisions using a manifest content analysis. Policy rankings were then created for each prevention and promotion. Rankings compared eight indicators from the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks-2 data on prevention and promotion practices for each member state using Chi-square and probit regression analyses. Results: Overall, 73.1% of EU establishments take preventive measures against direct physical harm, and about 35.4% take measures to prevent psychosocial risks. Merely 29.5% have measures to promote health. Weak and inconsistent links between OHS policy and practice indicators were identified. Conclusion: National OHS policies evidently concentrate on prevention while compliance with health and safety practices is relatively low. Psychosocial risks are often addressed in national policy but not implemented by institutions. Current risk assessment methods are outdated and often lack psychosocial indicators. Health promotion at work is rare in policy and practice, and its interpretation remains preventive. Member states need to adopt policies that actively improve health and well-being at the workplace.

Keywords

References

  1. Gagliardi D, Marinaccio A, Valenti A, Iavicoli S. Occupational safety and health in Europe: lessons from the past, challenges and opportunities for the future. Ind Health 2012;50:7-11. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.MS1342
  2. Eurostat. Self-reported work-related health problems and risk factors - key statistics. Luxembourg: Eurostat. 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2018, from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Self-reported_work-related_health_problems_and_risk_factors_-_key_statistics#External_links.
  3. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Motivation for employers to carry out workplace health promotion literature review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2012. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-publications/publications/literature_reviews/motivation-for-employers-to-carry-out-workplace-health-promotion.
  4. Aires MDM, Gamez MCR, Gibb A. Prevention through design: the effect of European Directives on construction workplace accidents. Saf Sci 2010;48:248-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.09.004
  5. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an EU strategic framework on health and safety at work 2014-2020. Brussels: European Commission. 2014. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0332&from=EN.
  6. Kilfedder C, Litchfield P. Wellbeing as a business priority - experience from the corporate world. In: Huppert F, Cooper C, editors. Wellbeing: a complete reference guide. Interventions and policies to enhance wellbeing, vol. VI. New York (US): John Wiley & Sons; 2014. p. 357-86.
  7. Boyce T, Peckham S, Hann A, Trenholm S. A pro-active approach. Health promotion and ill-health prevention. London: The King's Fund. 2010. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_document/health-promotion-ill-health-prevention-gp-inquiry-research-paper-mar11.pdf.
  8. World Health Organization. Recommendation of the second meeting of the WHO Collaborating Centres in Occupational Health. Global strategy on occupational health for all: the way to health at work. Beijing: WHO. 1994. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/occupational_health/publications/globstrategy/en/index2.html.
  9. World Health Organization. The Ottawa charter for health promotion. The Ottawa charter. Ottawa: WHO. 1986. Retrieved from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/policy-documents/ottawa-charter-for-health-promotion.
  10. ENWHP. Luxembourg declaration on workplace health promotion in the European Union. Leuven: ENWHP. 2007. Retrieved from, http://www.enwhp.org/fileadmin/rs-dokumente/dateien/Luxembourg_Declaration.pdf.
  11. Baicker K, Cutler D, Song Z. Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Aff 2010;29:304-11. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626
  12. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  13. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Second European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks [data collection]. 2nd ed. Munich: TNS Infratest Sozialforschung. 2014. UK Data Service; 2016. Retrieved March 4, 2018 from: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7808-1.
  14. StataCorp. Stata: release 13. Statistical software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2013.
  15. Hale AR, De Loor M, van Drimmelen D, Huppes G. Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards. J Occup Accid 1990;13:213-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N
  16. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission. Evaluation of the practical implementation of the EU Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) directives in EU member states; 2015. Synthesis Report. [online] COWI A/S. Retrieved March 21, 2018, from, http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=16897&langId=en.
  17. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Improving occupational safety and health in SMEs: examples of effective assistance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities. 2003. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/node/7017/file_view.
  18. Eurofound and European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Psychosocial risks in Europe: prevalence and strategies for prevention. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2014. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: https://osha.europa.eu/en/tools-and-publications/publications/reports/psychosocial-risks-eu-prevalence-strategies-prevention.
  19. Papadopoulosa G, Georgiadoub P, Papazoglouc C, Michalioud K. Occupational and public health and safety in a changing work environment: an integrated approach for risk assessment and prevention. Saf Sci 2010;48:943-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.002
  20. Leka S, Jain A, Zwetsloot G, Cox T. Policy-level interventions and work-related psychosocial risk management in the European Union. Work Stress 2010;24:298-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.519918
  21. Burton J. WHO healthy workplace framework and model: background and supporting literature and practices. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2010. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: http://www.who.int/occupational_health/healthy_workplace_framework.pdf.
  22. Knapp M, McDaid D, Parsonage M. Mental health promotion and mental illness prevention: the economic case. London: Department of Health. 2011. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/215626/dh_126386.pdf.
  23. Teichgraber M. Labour market and Labour force survey (LFS) statistics; 16-05-2016. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Labour_market_and_Labour_force_survey_(LFS)_statistics.

Cited by

  1. Is the Mandatory Implementation of Workplace Health Management Systems Harmful to the Competitiveness of European Employers or an Obstacle to Economic Growth? vol.8, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.211
  2. Validating the Psychosocial Safety Climate Questionnaire - Integration of Findings from Cognitive Interviews in Germany and Sweden vol.4, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.85
  3. Worksite health promotion and social inequalities in health vol.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100543
  4. Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility under the Background of Sustainable Development Goals: A Proposal to Corporate Volunteering vol.12, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124811
  5. Bibliometric Study of Technology and Occupational Health in Healthcare Sector: A Worldwide Trend to the Future vol.17, pp.18, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186732
  6. The management of the new and emerging musculoskeletal and psychosocial risks by EU-28 enterprises vol.77, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.011
  7. Evidence of Better Psychological Profile in Working Population Meeting Current Physical Activity Recommendations vol.18, pp.17, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178991