DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical simulation of complex hexagonal structures to predict drop behavior under submerged and fluid flow conditions

  • Yoon, K.H. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, H.S. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Oh, S.H. (ELSOLTEC Inc.) ;
  • Choi, C.R. (ELSOLTEC Inc.)
  • Received : 2018.04.20
  • Accepted : 2018.08.17
  • Published : 2019.02.25

Abstract

This study simulated a control rod assembly (CRA), which is a part of reactor shutdown systems, in immersed and fluid flow conditions. The CRA was inserted into the reactor core within a predetermined time limit under normal and abnormal operating conditions, and the CRA (which consists of complex geometric shapes) drop behavior is numerically modeled for simulation. A full-scale prototype CRA drop test is established under room temperature and water-fluid conditions for verification and validation. This paper describes the details of the numerical modeling and analysis results of the several conditions. Results from the developed numerical simulation code are compared with the test results to verify the numerical model and developed computer code. The developed code is in very good agreement with the test results and this numerical analysis model and method may replace the experimental and CFD method to predict the drop behavior of CRA.

Keywords

References

  1. K.H. Yoon, H.S. Lee, H.K. Kim, J.S. Cheon, Mechanical design evaluation of fuel assembly for PGSFR, in: Inter. Conf. On Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Next Generation Nuclear Systems for Sustainable Development. FR17, 2017. P1-017.
  2. H. Andriambololona, D. Bosselut, P. Massin, Methodology for a numerical simulation of an insertion or a drop of the rod cluster control assembly in a PWR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 237 (6) (2007) 600-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.001
  3. S.S. Taliyan, D.P. Roy, R.B. Grover, M. Singh, G. Govindarajan, Dynamics of shut-off rod drop in a PHWR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 147 (3) (1994) 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)90214-3
  4. S.K. Cheng, N.E. Todreas, Hydrodynamic models and correlations for bare and wire-wrapped hexagonal rod bundlesdbundle friction factors, subchannel friction factors and mixing parameters, Nucl. Eng. Des. 92 (2) (1986) 227-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(86)90249-9
  5. B. Hanliang, Z. Wenxiang, D. Duo, Studies on the performance of the hydraulic control rod drive for the NHR-200, Nucl. Eng. Des. 195 (1) (2000) 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00200-9
  6. B. Hanliang, Z. Yanhua, Z. Wenxiang, D. Duo, Study on step-up characteristic of hydraulic control rod driving system, Nucl. Eng. Des. 216 (1-3) (2002) 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00030-4
  7. F. Hofmann, F. Archambeau, C. Chaize, Computational fluid dynamic analysis of a guide tube in a PWR, Nucl. Eng. Des. 200 (1-2) (2000) 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00322-2
  8. V.R. Babu, G. Thanigaiyarasu, P. Chellapandi, Mathematical modelling of performance of safety rod and its drive mechanism in sodium cooled fast reactor during scram action, Nucl. Eng. Des. 278 (2014) 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.08.015
  9. D.F. Young, B.R. Munson, T.H. Okiishi, A Brief Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, third ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004.
  10. Y.A. Cengel, J.M. Cimbala, Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, International Edition, McGraw Hill Publication, 2006.
  11. I.E. Idelchik, Handbook of Hydraulic Resistancee4th Edition Revised and Augmented Research, Institute for Gas Purification, Moscow, 2008.
  12. ANSYS, CFX Solver Modeling Guide, 2013. Release 15.0.
  13. Y.K. Lee, J.H. Lee, H.W. Kim, S.K. Kim, J.B. Kim, Drop performance test of conceptually designed control rod assembly for prototype generation IV sodium-cooled fast reactor, Nucl. Eng. Tech. 49 (2017) 855-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.12.004