Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제46권3호
  • /
  • Pages.248-254
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception of upper lip augmentation utilizing simulated photography

  • Linkov, Gary (Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine) ;
  • Wick, Elizabeth (Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kallogjeri, Dorina (Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chen, Collin L. (Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine) ;
  • Branham, Gregory H. (Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.01
  • Accepted : 2019.04.23
  • Published : 2019.05.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

Abstract

Background No head to head comparison is available between surgical lip lifting and upper lip filler injections to decide which technique yields the best results in patients. Despite the growing popularity of upper lip augmentation, its effect on societal perceptions of attractiveness, successfulness and overall health in woman is unknown. Methods Blinded casual observers viewed three versions of independent images of 15 unique patient lower faces for a total of 45 images. Observers rated the attractiveness, perceived success, and perceived overall health for each patient image. Facial perception questions were answered on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores corresponded to more positive responses. Results Two hundred and seventeen random observers with an average age of 47 years (standard deviation, 15.9) rated the images. The majority of observers were females (n=183, 84%) of white race (n=174, 80%) and had at least some college education (n=202, 93%). The marginal mean score for perceived attractiveness from the natural condition was 1.5 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-2.18) higher than perceived attractiveness from the simulated upper lip filler injection condition, and 2.6 points higher (95% CI, 1.95-3.24) than the simulated upper lip lift condition. There was a moderate to strong correlation between the scores of the same observer. Conclusions Simulated upper lip augmentation is amenable to social perception analysis. Scores of the same observer for attractiveness, successfulness, and overall health are strongly correlated. Overall, the natural condition had the highest scores in all categories, followed by simulated upper lip filler, and lastly simulated upper lip lift.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2017 Plastic surgery statistics report [Internet]. Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Plastic Surgeons; c2018 [cited 2019 May 3]. Available from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2017.pdf.
  2. Popenko NA, Tripathi PB, Devcic Z, et al. A quantitative approach to determining the ideal female lip aesthetic and its effect on facial attractiveness. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2049
  3. Penna V, Fricke A, Iblher N, et al. The attractive lip: a photomorphometric analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68:920-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.03.013
  4. Wong WW, Davis DG, Camp MC, et al. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: a three-dimensional analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:2032-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.12.015
  5. Sawyer AR, See M, Nduka C. 3D stereophotogrammetry quantitative lip analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:497-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9191-1
  6. Haworth RD. Customizing perioral enhancement to obtain ideal lip aesthetics: combining both lip voluming and reshaping procedures by means of an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:2182-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122546.90916.B4
  7. Mommaerts MY, Blythe JN. Rejuvenation of the ageing upper lip and nose with suspension lifting. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44:1123-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.007
  8. Lee DE, Hur SW, Lee JH, et al. Central lip lift as aesthetic and physiognomic plastic surgery: the effect on lower facial profile. Aesthet Surg J 2015;35:698-707. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv068
  9. Moragas JS, Vercruysse HJ, Mommaerts MY. "Non-filling" procedures for lip augmentation: a systematic review of contemporary techniques and their outcomes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:943-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.015
  10. Ponsky D, Guyuron B. Comprehensive surgical aesthetic enhancement and rejuvenation of the perioral region. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31:382-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11409009
  11. Echo A, Momoh AO, Yuksel E. The no-scar lip-lift: upper lip suspension technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011;35:617-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9655-6
  12. Weston GW, Poindexter BD, Sigal RK, et al. Lifting lips: 28 years of experience using the direct excision approach to rejuvenating the aging mouth. Aesthet Surg J 2009;29:83-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2009.01.013
  13. Waldman SR. The subnasal lift. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2007;15:513-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2007.08.003
  14. Santanche P, Bonarrigo C. Lifting of the upper lip: personal technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1828-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000117661.07141.70
  15. Niechajev I. Lip enhancement: surgical alternatives and histologic aspects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1173-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200003000-00055
  16. Guerrissi JO. Surgical treatment of the senile upper lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:938-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200009020-00036
  17. Jeter TS, Nishioka GJ. The lip lift: an alternative corrective procedure for latrogenic vertical maxillary deficiency: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;46:323-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(88)90019-5
  18. Austin HW. The lip lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:990-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198606000-00024
  19. Fanous N. Correction of thin lips: "lip lift". Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;74:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198407000-00005
  20. Rozner L, Isaacs GW. Lip lifting. Br J Plast Surg 1981;34: 481-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(81)90063-1
  21. Nellis JC, Ishii M, Bater KL, et al. Association of rhinoplasty with perceived attractiveness, success, and overall health. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018;20:97-102. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1453
  22. Bater KL, Ishii M, Joseph A, et al. Perception of hair transplant for androgenetic alopecia. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016;18:413-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0546
  23. Perenack J. Treatment options to optimize display of anterior dental esthetics in the patient with the aged lip. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1634-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.160
  24. Kane MA, Lorenc ZP, Lin X, et al. Validation of a lip fullness scale for assessment of lip augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:822e-828e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2df0
  25. Geronemus RG, Bank DE, Hardas B, et al. Safety and effectiveness of VYC-15L, a hyaluronic acid filler for lip and perioral enhancement: one-year results from a randomized, controlled study. Dermatol Surg 2017;43:396-404. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001035

Cited by

  1. Lip enhancement and mouth corner lift with fillers and botulinum toxin A vol.33, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.14231