DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The safety of one-per-mil tumescent infiltration into tissue that has survived ischemia

  • Prasetyono, Theddeus Octavianus Hari (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia) ;
  • Nindita, Eliza (Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.11
  • 심사 : 2019.01.08
  • 발행 : 2019.03.31

초록

Background The aim of this study was to assess the safety of one-per-mil tumescent injections into viable skin flaps that had survived an ischemic insult, in order to assess the potential suitability of one-per-mil tumescent injections in future secondary reconstructive procedures such as flap revision and refinements after replantation. Methods Forty groin flaps harvested from 20 healthy Wistar rats weighing 220 to 270 g were subjected to acute ischemia by clamping the pedicle for 15 minutes. All flaps showing total survival on the 7th postoperative day were randomly divided into group A (one-per-mil tumescent infiltration; n=14), group B (normal saline infiltration; n=13), and group C (control, with no infiltration; n=13) before being re-elevated. Transcutaneous oxygen tension ($TcPO_2$) was measured before and after infiltration, and changes in $TcPO_2$ were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance, the paired t-test, and the independent t-test. The viability of flaps was also assessed using the Analyzing Digital Images software at 7 days after the second elevation. Results Thirty-nine flaps survived to the final assessment, with the sole exception of a flap from group A that did not survive the first elevation. $TcPO_2$ readings showed significant decreases (P<0.05) following both one-per-mil tumescent ($99.9{\pm}5.7mmHg$ vs. $37.2{\pm}6.3mmHg$) and normal saline ($103{\pm}8.5mmHg$ vs. $48.7{\pm}5.9mmHg$) infiltration. Moreover, all groin flaps survived with no signs of tissue necrosis. Conclusions One-per-mil tumescent infiltration into groin flap tissue that had survived ischemia did not result in tissue necrosis, although the flaps experienced a significant decrease of cutaneous oxygenation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sabapathy SR, Bhardwaj P. Secondary procedures in replantation. Semin Plast Surg 2013;27:198-204. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360587
  2. Larson JV, Kung TA, Cederna PS, et al. Clinical factors associated with replantation after traumatic major upper extremity amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:911-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829f4a49
  3. Flint P, Cummings C, Haughey B, et al. Cummings otolaryngology head & neck surgery. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.
  4. Hui-Chou HG, Sulek J, Bluebond-Langner R, et al. Secondary refinements of free perforator flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:248-57. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95b67
  5. Lalonde D, Martin A. Epinephrine in local anesthesia in finger and hand surgery: the case for wide-awake anesthesia. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013;21:443-7. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-08-443
  6. Al Youha S, Lalonde DH. Update/review: changing of use of local anesthesia in the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014;2:e150. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000095
  7. Bueno RA Jr, Battiston B, Ciclamini D, et al. Replantation: current concepts and outcomes. Clin Plast Surg 2014;41: 385-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2014.03.010
  8. Pederson WC, Sherman R. Reconstructive surgery of the mutilated hand. In: Chang J, Neligan P, editors. Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed, vol. 6. New York: Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 250-81.
  9. Klein JA. Tumescent technique for local anesthesia improves safety in large-volume liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:1085-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199311000-00014
  10. Hanke C, Sommer B, Sattler G, et al. Tumescent local anesthesia. Darmstadt: Springer-Veriag Berlin Heidelberg; 2001.
  11. Lalonde D, Martin A. Tumescent local anesthesia for hand surgery: improved results, cost effectiveness, and wide-awake patient satisfaction. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:312-6. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.312
  12. Prasetyono TO, Biben JA. One-per-mil tumescent technique for upper extremity surgeries: broadening the indication. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.034
  13. Klein JA, Jeske DR. Estimated maximal safe dosages of tumescent lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2016;122:1350-9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001119
  14. Prasetyono TO, Adianto S. The relationship between oxygen saturation and color alteration of a compromised skin flap: experimental study on the rabbit. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40:505-9. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.5.505
  15. Kagaya Y, Ohura N, Kurita M, et al. Examination of tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) changes associated with vascular pedicle occlusion in a rat Island flap model using near-Infrared spectroscopy. Microsurgery 2015;35:393-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22385
  16. Adingupu DD, Thorn CE, Casanova F, et al. Blood oxygen saturation after ischemia is altered with abnormal microvascular reperfusion. Microcirculation 2015;22:294-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12198
  17. Thornton JF, Gosman AA. Skin grafts and skin subtitutes and principles of flaps. Dallas: Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery; 2004.
  18. Ollague JE, Zabielinski M, Nouri K. Anesthesia in dermatologic surgery. In: Nouri K, editior. Dermatologic surgery: step by step. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 20-4.
  19. Venkataram J. Tumescent liposuction: a review. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2008;1:49-57. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.44159
  20. Taylor AE, Moore TM. Capillary fluid exchange. Am J Physiol 1999;277(6 Pt 2):S203-10.