Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of Service Quality in University

대학교육 서비스품질의 중요도-만족도 분석 연구

  • Kim, Myung Kyum (The Dept. of Business Administration, Soongsil University) ;
  • Park, Jongwoo (The Dept. of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
  • Received : 2019.11.07
  • Accepted : 2019.11.27
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To increase the competitiveness of the university and improve the quality of education by providing education services that meet the student's satisfaction needs based on the education service quality survey of university students. Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 6 elements and 38 questions was prepared and students were surveyed. The importance and satisfaction ISA analysis was conducted. Results: The results of this study are as follows; there was a difference in the perception of importance and satisfaction by student characteristics regarding the results of educational service quality measurement. Working students need an extra effort in the educational environment and foreign students in student services. Conclusion: The importance of educational service quality-satisfaction survey should be used to identify the factors of educational service quality by student characteristics to improve student satisfaction, improve the quality of education, and support educational services with a strategic approach.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdullah, F. 2006. "The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector." International Journal of Consumer Studies 30(6):569-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
  2. Abdullah., F. 2006. "Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdFERF versus SERVPERF." Marketing Intelligence & Planning 24(1):31-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610641543
  3. Astin, A. W. 1993. Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
  4. Astin, Alexander W. 1980. Whe Does a College Deserve to be Called High Quality Improving Teaching and Institutional Quality. Current Issues in Higher Education, AAHE, Report No. 1, Washington, D. C.: American Association for Higher Education.
  5. Bitner, M. J. 1990. "Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses." Journal of Marketing 54:69-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400206
  6. Brown, D. J., and H. F. Koenig. 1993. "Applying Total Quality Management to Business Education." Journal of Education for Business 68:329-329.
  7. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. 1992. "Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension." Journal of Marketing 56(3):55-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600106
  8. Deming, Y. 2006. "Implication characteristics of school brand and its creation." Educational Research 27(8):81-83.
  9. Dotchin, J. A., and J. S. Oakland. 1994. "Total Quality Management in Services, Part I: Understanding and Classifying Services." International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 11(3):9-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719410056459
  10. Elliot, K. M., & Shin, D. 2002. "Student satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing this important concept." Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 24(2):197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518
  11. Firdaus, A. 2005. "HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The Quest for Ideal Measuring Instrument of Service Quality in Higher Education Sector." Quality Assurance in Education 13(4):305-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510626584
  12. Jin, Hye Kyoung. 2017. The effects of physical environment on student's satisfaction and class concentration in college education services, The Graduate School Hanyang University, Ph. D. Degree.
  13. Joanna Tonge, and Susan A. Moore, "Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-part hinterlands: A Western Australian case study." Tourism Management 28:771.
  14. Joseph, M. and B. Joseph. 1997. "Service Quality in Education: A Student Perspective." Quality Assurance in Education 5(1):26-37.
  15. Kang, Man-Su, and Park, Sang-Kyu. 2011. "Assessing the Effects of SErvice Quality on Student Satisfation, Reputation and Loyalty." The Journal of Educational Administration 29(1):153-174.
  16. Kang, Man-Su. 2011 "Compecting Models of Educational SErvice Quality between National and Private Universities in Korea." KangWon University, Ph. D. Degree.
  17. KESS Center for Educational Statistics Information, http://kess.kedi.re.kr/index.
  18. Korean Council for University Education University Admission Information Framework http://www.kcue.or.kr.
  19. Lagrosen, S., R. Seyyed-Hashemi and M. Leitner. 2004. "Examination of the Dimensions of Quality in Higher Education." Quality Assurance in Education 12(2):61-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410536431
  20. Lee, Jin-young. 2017. Study on the effect of Education Service Quality on Student Satisfaction, Department Brand Equity and Loyalty, The Graduate School Sejong University, Ph. D. Degree.
  21. Lee, Kyung Cheol. 2004. "Causal Model Study on the Effect of Eduation Service Quality on Students Satisfaction, University Image and Behavior Intention." The Journal of Educational Administration 22(4):287-309.
  22. Lee, Sang-Jun, Yoon, Kwan-Ho, Kim, Seong-Yoon. 2013. The Model Development of Satisfaction Measurement Index of Education Service and the Improvement Plan of IPA, The Korea Contents Society 13(11):510-521. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.11.510
  23. Li-Wei, M. 2005. A comparative study between UK and US: The student satisfaction in higher education and its influential factors. Journal of Marketing Management 21(7):859-878. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725705774538471
  24. Oh, Sook Young. 2015. "A Theoretical and Empirical Study on Factors and Construct Validity of Student Course Evaluation Instrument: -Focused on the Student Course Evaluation Case of S' University." The Korea Educational Review 21(4):5-35.
  25. Oliver, R. L. 1997, Satisfaction:A BehavioralPerspectiveontheConsumer, McGraw-Hill, New York, 177.
  26. Oliver, R. L., and DeSarbo, W. S. 1989. "Processing of the satisfaction response in consumption: a suggested framework and research proposition." Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining and Behavior, 2, 1-16.
  27. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1985. "A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and It's Implications for Future Research." Journal of Marketing 49, Fall, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
  28. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1991. "Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale." Journal of Retailing 67(4):420-450.
  29. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. 1988. "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality." Journal of Retailing 64(1), 12-40.
  30. Sahney, S, D. K. Banwet, and S. Karunes. 2006. "An Integrated Framework for Quality in Education: Application of Quality Function Deployment, Interpretive Structural Modelling and Path Analysis." Total Quality Management 17(2):265-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500450376
  31. Shim, Woo-Geuk. 2015. "A Study on the Domestic Research Trend of Educational Service Quality." Korean Review of Corporation Management 6(1):55-76.
  32. Shin, Soyoung, and Kwon, Soungyoun. 2014. "The important-satisfaction analysis of educational satisfaction by the student's characteristics." The Korea Educational Review 20(1):253-280.
  33. Sung Kang. 2011. "The Measurement of Service Quality and Quality Improvement Using Importance-Performance Analysis in Higher Education." Korean Production and Operations Management Society 22(2):177-196.