References
- A.M. Weinberg, The maturity and future of nuclear energy, Am. Sci. 64 (1975) 79-89.
- IAEA, International status and prospects for nuclear power 2017, in: Board of Governors General Conference, 2017, pp. 1-16. GOV/INF/2017/12-GC(61)/INF/8.
- N Energy, Technology Roadmap: Nuclear Energy, OECD/IEA and OECD/NEA, 2015, pp. 14-15, 2015.
- L. Huang, R. He, Q. Yang, J. Chen, Y. Zhou, J.K. Hammitt, X. Lu, J. Bi, Y. Liu, The changing risk perception towards nuclear power in China after the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan, Energy Policy 120 (2018) 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.007
- Y. Wu, Public acceptance of constructing coastal/inland nuclear power plants in post-Fukushima China, Energy Policy 101 (2017) 484-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.008
- S. Wang, J. Wang, S. Lin, J. Li, Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: the role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement, Energy Policy 126 (2019) 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.040
- Y. Guo, T. Ren, When it is unfamiliar to me: local acceptance of planned nuclear power plants in China in the post-fukushima era, Energy Policy 100 (2017) 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.002
- C. Liu, Z. Zhang, S. Kidd, Establishing an objective system for the assessment of public acceptance of nuclear power in China, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (2008) 2834-2838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.04.001
- Y. Wang, J. Li, A causal model explaining Chinese university students' acceptance of nuclear power, Prog. Nucl. Energy 88 (2016) 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.01.002
- V.H.M. Visschers, M. Siegrist, How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster, Risk Anal. 33 (2013) 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x
- Y. Ryu, S. Kim, S. Kim, Does trust matter? Analyzing the impact of trust on the perceived risk and acceptance of nuclear power energy, Sustainability 10 (2018).
- M. Siegrist, The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology, Risk Anal. 20 (2000) 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020
- Q. Xiao, H. Liu, M.W. Feldman, How does trust affect acceptance of a nuclear power plant (NPP): a survey among people living with Qinshan NPP in China, PLoS One 12 (2017), e0187941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187941
- P. Bryant, R. Dunford, The influence of regulatory focus on risky decisionmaking, Appl. Psychol. 57 (2008) 335-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00319.x
- E.T. Higgins, Beyond pleasure and pain, Am. Psychol. 52 (1997) 1280-1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
- E.T. Higgins, Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as A motivational principle, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30 (1998) 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0
- J.L. Aaker, A.Y. Lee, Understanding regulatory fit, J. Mark. Res. 43 (2006) 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.1.15
- C.L. Anderson, R. Agarwal, Practicing Safe Computing: a Multimedia Empirical Examination of Home Computer User Security Behavioral Intentions, Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center, 2010.
- Y. He, Q. Chen, S. Kitkuakul, L.T. Wright, Regulatory focus and technology acceptance: perceived ease of use and usefulness as efficacy, Cogent Bus. Manag. 5 (2018).
- Y. Zhang, V. Mittal, The attractiveness of enriched and impoverished options: culture, self-construal, and regulatory focus, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33 (2007) 588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296954
- S.M. Forsythe, B. Shi, Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping, J. Bus. Res. 56 (2003) 867-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9
- N. Vol, Advances in the psychology of consumer investment, Adv. Consum. Res. 31 (2004) 604-606.
- P. Atorough, B. Donaldson, The relationship between regulatory focus and online shopping-perceived risk, affect, and consumers' response to online marketing, Int. J. Internet Mark. Advert. 7 (2012).
- Y. Chang, S.F. Wong, H. Lee, S.P. Jeong, What motivates Chinese consumers to adopt FinTech services, in: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce e-Commerce in Smart connected World-ICEC '16, 2016, pp. 1-3.
- Q. Zhao, C.-D. Chen, J.-L. Wang, P.-C. Chen, Determinants of backers' funding intention in crowdfunding: social exchange theory and regulatory focus, Telematics Inf. 34 (2017) 370-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.006
- R. Kark, D. Van Dijk, D.R. Vashdi, Motivated or demotivated to Be creative: the role of self-regulatory focus in transformational and transactional leadership processes, Appl. Psychol. 67 (2018) 186-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12122
- J.R. Parkins, R. Haluza-DeLay, Social and Ethical Considerations of Nuclear Power Development, 2011.
- D. Kyne, B. Bolin, Emerging environmental justice issues in nuclear power and radioactive contamination, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13 (2016) 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070700
- P. Slovic, Perception of risk, Science 236 (1987) 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
- G.C. Michael Siegrist, C. Roth, Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk-Benefit Perception, 2000.
- M. Siegrist, H. Gutscher, T.C. Earle, Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence, J. Risk Res. 8 (2006) 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000105315
- V.H.M. Visschers, C. Keller, M. Siegrist, Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: investigating an explanatory model, Energy Policy 39 (2011) 3621-3629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064
- S.S. Ho, T. Oshita, J. Looi, A.D. Leong, A.S. Chuah, Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam: a qualitative approach, Energy Policy 127 (2019) 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.011
- T.-Y. Park, S. Kim, L.-K. Sung, Fair pay dispersion: a regulatory focus theory view, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 142 (2017) 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.003
- E. Crowe, E.T. Higgins, Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 69 (1997) 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
- Y.D. Kim, Y.-W. Ha, Who is afraid of disposition of financial assets? The moderating role of regulatory focus in the disposition effect, Mark. Lett. 27 (2014) 159-169.
- F. Gino, J.D. Margolis, Bringing ethics into focus: how regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (Un)ethical behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115 (2011) 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.006
- J. Gu, V.K. Bohns, G.J. Leonardelli, Regulatory focus and interdependent economic decision-making, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49 (2013) 692-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.008
- M. Hassenzahl, M. Schobel, T. Trautmann, How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: the role of regulatory focus, Interact. Comput. 20 (2008) 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.05.001
- D.T. Kao, Exploring the effect of regulatory focus on ad attitudes: the moderating roles of message sidedness and argument quality, Int. J. Psychol. : J. Int. Psychol. 47 (2012) 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.628672
- L. Werth, J. Foerster, How regulatory focus influences consumer behavior, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 37 (2007) 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.343
- D.R. Hekman, D. van Knippenberg, M.G. Pratt, Channeling identification: how perceived regulatory focus moderates the influence of organizational and professional identification on professional employees' diagnosis and treatment behaviors, Hum. Relat. 69 (2015) 753-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715599240
- T. Whitford, S.A. Moss, Transformational leadership in distributed work groups: the moderating role of follower regulatory focus and goal orientation, Commun. Res. 36 (2009) 810-837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209346800
- J.S. Smith, M.R. Gleim, S.G. Robinson, W.J. Kettinger, S.-H.S. Park, Using an old dog for new tricks: a regulatory focus perspective on consumer acceptance of RFID applications, J. Serv. Res. 17 (2013) 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513501394
- L. Mannetti, A. Brizi, M. Giacomantonio, E.T. Higgins, Framing political messages to fit the audience's regulatory orientation: how to improve the efficacy of the same message content, PLoS One 8 (2013), e77040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077040
- J. Beck, A. Eichinger, K. Bengler, Trait, state or artefact? Assessing experts' regulatory focus in nuclear power plant control, Cognit. Technol. Work 16 (2014) 531-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0283-1
- R.M. Baron, D.A. Kenny, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual,strategic, and statistical considerations, J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51 (1986) 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- A. Florack, J. Palcu, M. Friese, The moderating role of regulatory focus on the social modeling of food intake, Appetite 69 (2013) 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.012
- A. Berezowska, A.R.H. Fischer, H.C.M. Van Trijp, The interplay between regulatory focus and temporal distance in the health context, Br. J. Health Psychol. 23 (2018) 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12272
- N. Tsujikawa, S. Tsuchida, T. Shiotani, Changes in the factors influencing public acceptance of nuclear power generation in Japan since the 2011 fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, Risk Anal. 36 (2016) 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12447
- D.H. McKnight, V. Choudhury, C. Kacmar, Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: an Integrative Typology, Inf. Syst. Res. 13 (2002) 334-359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
- V.H.M. Visschers, M. Siegrist, Find the differences and the similarities: relating perceived benefits, perceived costs and protected values to acceptance of five energy technologies, J. Environ. Psychol. 40 (2014) 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.007
- Y. Shin, M.S. Kim, J.N. Choi, M. Kim, W.-K. Oh, Does leader-follower regulatory fit matter? The role of regulatory fit in followers' organizational citizenship behavior, J. Manag. 43 (2016) 1211-1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314546867
- D. Xia, Y. Li, Y. He, T. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Gu, Exploring the role of cultural individualism and collectivism on public acceptance of nuclear energy, Energy Policy 132 (2019) 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.014
- E.T. Higgins, S. Spiegel, Promotion and prevention strategies for selfregulation: a motivated cognition perspective, in: R. Baumeister, K. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation, 2004, pp. 171-187.
- Kang-Yin, Dong, Ren-Jin, Hong-Dian, Jiang, A review of China's energy consumption structure and outlook based on a long-range energy alternatives modeling tool, Petrol. Sci. 14 (2017) 214-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-016-0136-z
- S. Zhou, X. Zhang, Nuclear energy development in China: a study of opportunities and challenges, Energy 35 (2010) 4282-4288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.04.020
Cited by
- Consumer’s Risk Perception and Preventive Behavior for Particulate Matter: Moderating Effects of Health Regulatory Focus vol.31, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2020.31.3.443
- Youths Interests in the Biosphere and Sensitivity to Nuclear Power Technology in the UAE: With Discussions on Open Innovation and Technological Convergence in Energy and Water Sectors vol.6, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040180