Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical investigation of flow characteristics through simple support grids in a 1 × 3 rod bundle

  • Karaman, Umut (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hacettepe University) ;
  • Kocar, Cemil (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hacettepe University) ;
  • Rau, Adam (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University) ;
  • Kim, Seungjin (School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University)
  • Received : 2018.10.17
  • Accepted : 2019.06.19
  • Published : 2019.12.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper investigated the influence of simple support girds on flow, irrespective of having mixing vanes, in a 1 × 3 array rod bundle by using CFD methodology and the most accurate turbulence model which could reflect the actual physics of the flow was determined. In this context, a CFD model was created simulating the experimental studies on a single-phase flow [1] and the results were compared with the experimental data. In the first part of the study, influence of mesh was examined. Tetra, hybrid and poly type meshes were analyzed and convergence study was carried out on each in order to determine the most appropriate type and density. k - ε Standard and RSM LPS turbulence models were used in this section. In the second part of the study, the most appropriate turbulence model that could reflect the physics of the actual flow was investigated. RANS based turbulence models were examined using the mesh that was determined in the first part. Velocity and turbulence intensity results obtained on the upstream and downstream of the spacer grid at -3dh, +3dh and +40dh locations were compared with the experimental data. In the last section of the study, the behavior of flow through the spacer grid was examined and its prominent aspects were highlighted on the most appropriate turbulence model determined in the second part. Results of the study revealed the importance of mesh type. Hybrid mesh having the largest number of structured elements performed remarkably better than the other two on results. While comparisons of numerical and experimental results showed an overall agreement within all turbulence models, RSM LPS presented better results than the others. Lastly, physical appearance of the flow through spacer grids revealed that springs has more influence on flow than dimples and induces transient flow behaviors. As a result, flow through a simple support grid was examined and the most appropriate turbulence model reflecting the actual physics of the flow was determined.

Keywords

References

  1. J.E. Wheeler, Experimental studies on the effects of a spacer grid, in: A 1x3 ROD Bundle Sinle and Two-phase Flow, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2014.
  2. K. Ikeda, M. Hoshi, Single-phase CFD applicability for estimating fluid hot-spot locations in a 5 x 5 fuel rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2006) 1149-1154.
  3. X.-Z. Cui, K.-Y. Kim, Three-dimensional analysis of turbulent heat transger and flow through mixing vane in a subchannel of nuclear reactor, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. (2003) 719-724.
  4. C. Lee, Y. Choi, Comparison of thermo-hydraulic performances of large scale vortexx flow (LSVF) and small scale vortex flow (SSVF) mixing vanes in 17 x 17 nuclear rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2007) 2322-2331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.04.011
  5. X. Li ve, Y. Gao, Methods of simulating large-scale rod bundle and application to a 17 x 17 fuel assembly with mixing vane spacer grid, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2013) 10-22.
  6. M.E. Conner, CFD methodology and validation for single-phase flow in PWR fuel assemblies, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2009) 2088-2095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.11.031
  7. A. Gandhir, Y. Hassan, RANS modeling for flow in nuclear fuel bundle in pressurized water reactor (PWR), Nucl. Eng. Des. (2011) 4404-4408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.084
  8. C. Liu, Y. Freng, Numerically simulating the thermal-hydraulic charateristics within the fuel rod bundle using CFD methodology, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2010) 3078-3086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.05.021
  9. J. Xiong, R. Chenga, C. Lu, X. Chia, X. Liu, X. Cheng, CFD simulation of swirling flow induced by twist vanes in a rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2018) 52-62.
  10. U. Bieder, F. Falk, G. Fauchet, CFD analysis of the flow in the near wake of a generic PWR mixing grid, Ann. Nucl. Energy (2015) 169-178.
  11. J. Wu, H. Liang, F. Zhu, J. Lei, CFD analysis of the impact of a novel spacer grid with longitudinal vortex generators on the sub-channel flow and heat transfer of a rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2017) 78-92.
  12. D. Chen, Y. Xiao, S. Xie, D. Yuan, X. Lang, Z. Yang, Y. Zhong, Q. Lu, Thermal-hydraulic performance of a 5 x 5 rod bundle with spacer grid in a nuclear reactor, Appl. Therm. Eng. (2016) 1416-1426.
  13. A. Toti, J. Vierendeels, F. Belloni, Coupled system thermal-hydraulic/CFD analysis of a protected loss of flow transient in the MYRRHA reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy (2018) 199-211.
  14. G. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Tian, L. Li, X. Dong, H. Ju, Design of a CFD scheme using multiple RANS models for PWR, Ann. Nucl. Energy (2017) 349-358.
  15. M. Zimmermann, X. Cheng, I. Otic, G. Sieber, K. Goodheart, Numerical investigation and modeling of two phase flow sweeping in rod bundles with mixing vane grid spacers, Ann. Nucl. Energy (2015) 403-417.
  16. V. Agbodemegbe, X. Cheng, E. Akaho, F. Allotey, An investigation of the effect of split-type mixing vane on extent of crossflow between subchannels through the fuel rod gaps, Ann. Nucl. (2016) 174-185.
  17. L. Capone, S. Benhamadouche, Y. Hassan, Source terms modeling for spacer grids with mixing vanes for CFD simulations in nuclear reactors, Comput. Fluids (2016) 141-152.
  18. B. Koncar, S. Kosmrlj, Simulation of turbulent flow in MATIS-H rod bundle with split-type mixing vanes, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2018) 112-126.
  19. F.M. Nedwidek, Experimental Studies for the Effects of the Spacer Grid on Two-phase Flow Regime Transition, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2011.
  20. ANSYS, ANSYS FLUENT User's Guide, Pennsylvania, 2018.
  21. S.K. Kang, Y.A. Hassan, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) round robin benchmark for a pressurized water reactor (PWR) rod bundle, Nucl. Eng. Desing (2016) 204-231.
  22. Committee On The Safety Of Nuclear Installations, Best Practice Guidelines for the Use of CFD in Nuclear Reactor Safety Application, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2015.
  23. J.R. Lee, J. Kim, C.-H. Song, Synthesis of the turbulent mixing in a rod bundle with vaned spacer grids based on the OECD-KAERI CFD benchmark exercise, Nucl. Eng. Des. (2014) 3-18.
  24. EPRI, Computational Fluid Dynamics Benchmark of High Fidelity Rod Bundle Experiments: Industry Round Robin Phase 1 - Rod Bundle with Simple Support Grids, Electric Power Research Insitute, California, 2014.
  25. U. Karaman, C. Kocar, A. Rau, S. Kim, Investigation of turbulence characteristics of the flow in a 1x3 fuel rod bundle with spacer grids using computational fluid dynamics method, in: 26th International Conference Nuclear, Bled, 2017.
  26. B. Magolan, E. Baglietto, M. Christon, T. Smith, Non-linear eddy viscosity turbulence modeling in hydra-TH for fuel related applications, in: 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-hydraulics, Chicago, IL, 2015.

Cited by

  1. Flow induced vibration investigation of a main steam pipe suffering from high temperature steam flow vol.143, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104040