Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Activity Level and Body Mass Index as Predictors of Physical Workload During Working Career

  • Manttari, Satu K. (Work Ability and Working Careers, Unit of Research, Development, Training and Service of Occupational Health, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health) ;
  • Oksa, Juha A.H. (Work Ability and Working Careers, Unit of Research, Development, Training and Service of Occupational Health, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health) ;
  • Virkkala, Jussi (Work Ability and Working Careers, Unit of Research, Development, Training and Service of Occupational Health, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health) ;
  • Pietila, Julia A.K. (Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University)
  • Received : 2018.06.15
  • Accepted : 2019.09.04
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of inactivity and obesity, along with aging, has implications on work capacity of labor force. This study reports the relationships between activity level and BMI by age with objectively measured physical workload. Data were examined from a sample of 19 481 Finnish employees using an estimate of minute-to-minute oxygen consumption based on R-R interval recordings. The mean estimated %VO2max during the working day was 12.1 (±3.6) and 15.1 (±4.5)% for men and women, respectively. Based on a linear model, the mean %VO2max increased by 1.5%-unit per 10-year increase in age, by 2.1%-unit per 5 kg/㎡ increase in BMI, and decreased by 1.6%-unit if improving physical activity class by two (p < 0.001 for all). Overweight and obesity, together with inactivity, notably increases workload throughout the career, even though at young adulthood, the daily workload is almost the same for each person regardless of the BMI, activity level, or gender. This study highlights the importance of regular physical activity and normal weight in protecting the worker from excessive physical (cardiovascular) workload during the whole working career.

Keywords

References

  1. Parmeggiani L. Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety. 1st ed. Geneva (Switzerland): International Labour Organization; 1971. p. 458-60.
  2. World Health Organization. Ageing and working capacity. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 1993. Technical Series no. 835.: WHO.
  3. Kenny GP, Yardley JE, Martineau L, Jay O. Physical work capacity in older adults: implications for the aging worker. Am J Ind Med 2008;51:610-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20600
  4. Sehl ME, Yates FE. Kinetics of human aging: I. Rates of senescence between ages 30 and 70 years in healthy people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:B198-208. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.5.B198
  5. Era P, Lyyra AL, Viitasalo J. Determinants of isometric muscle strength in men of different ages. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1992;64:84-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376446
  6. Ilmarinen J, Louhevaara V, Korhonen O, Nygard CH, Hakola T, Suvanto S. Changes in maximal cardiorespiratory capacity among aging municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;17:99-109.
  7. Pronk N, Martinson B, Kessler R, Beck A, Simon G, Wang P. The association between work performance and physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and obesity. JOEM 2004;46:19-25.
  8. Mutikainen S, Helander E, Pietila J, Korhonen I, Kujala UM. Objectively measured physical activity in Finnish employees: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005927. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005927
  9. Firstbeat Technologies Ltd. VO2 estimation method based on heart rate measurement [Internet]. Available from: http://www.firstbeat.com/userData/firstbeat/download/white_paper_vo2_estimation.pdf 2005; 2005.
  10. Roberts D, Gebhardt DL, Gaskill SE, Roy T, Sharp M. Current considerations related to physiological differences between the sexes and physical employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016;41:S108-20. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0540
  11. Ainsworth B, Haskell W, Whitt M, Irwin M, Swartz A, Strath S, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S498-504. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009
  12. van den Berg TIJ, Elders LAM, deZwart BCH, Burdorf A. The effects of workrelated and individual factors on the work ability index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2009;66:211-20. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.039883
  13. Hainer V, Toplak H, Stich V. Fat or fit: what is more important? Diabetes Care 2009;32:392-7.
  14. Silverstein M. Meeting the challenges of an aging workforce. Am J Ind Med 2008;51:269-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20569

Cited by

  1. Physiological workload evaluation by means of heart rate monitoring during motor-manual clearcutting operations vol.32, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2021.1868238
  2. Estimating the metabolic rate and associated physiological response for Indian subjects through climate chamber experiments vol.207, pp.no.pb, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108466