Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Incidental finding of subclavian artery occlusion and subsequent hypoplastic internal mammary artery as a candidate recipient vessel in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

  • Seong, Ik Hyun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine) ;
  • Woo, Kyong-Je (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2019.03.29
  • Accepted : 2019.06.12
  • Published : 2019.11.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We report a case of autologous breast reconstruction in which a thoracodorsal vessel was used as a recipient vessel after a hypoplastic internal mammary vessel was found on preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiography. A 46-year-old woman with no underlying disease was scheduled to undergo skin-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Preoperative CT angiography showed segmental occlusion of the right subclavian artery with severe atherosclerosis and calcification near the origin of the internal mammary artery, with distal flow maintained by collateral branches. The thoracodorsal artery was selected to be the recipient vessel because CT showed that it was of adequate size and was not affected by atherosclerosis. The patient experienced no postoperative complications, and the flap survived with no vascular complications. The breasts were symmetrical at a 6-month follow-up. This case highlights that preoperative vascular imaging modalities may help surgeons avoid using diseased vessels as recipient vessels in free flap breast reconstructions.

Keywords

References

  1. Lie KH, Barker AS, Ashton MW. A classification system for partial and complete DIEP flap necrosis based on a review of 17,096 DIEP flaps in 693 articles including analysis of 152 total flap failures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1401-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000434402.06564.bd
  2. Hefel L, Schwabegger A, Ninkovic M, et al. Internal mammary vessels: anatomical and clinical considerations. Br J Plast Surg 1995;48:527-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(95)90039-X
  3. Li S, Mu L, Li Y, et al. Breast reconstruction with the free bipedicled inferior TRAM flap by anastomosis to the proximal and distal ends of the internal mammary vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002;18:161-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-28498
  4. Mackey SP, Ramsey KW. Exploring the myth of the valveless internal mammary vein: a cadaveric study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:1174-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.045
  5. Clavero JA, Masia J, Larranaga J, et al. MDCT in the preoperative planning of abdominal perforator surgery for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:670-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2515
  6. Tong WM, Dixon R, Ekis H, et al. The impact of preoperative CT angiography on breast reconstruction with abdominal perforator flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68:525-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b69a4
  7. Rosson GD, Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography to predict weight and volume of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2011;31: 510-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20910
  8. Woo KJ, Kim EJ, Lee KT, et al. A novel method to estimate the weight of the DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: DIEP-W, a simple calculation formula using paraumbilical flap thickness. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32:520-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1581078
  9. Kim H, Lim SY, Pyon JK, et al. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography of both donor and recipient sites for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:11e-20e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547d2a
  10. Sisto T, Isola J. Incidence of atherosclerosis in the internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:884-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(89)90027-1
  11. Shadman R, Criqui MH, Bundens WP, et al. Subclavian artery stenosis: prevalence, risk factors, and association with cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:618-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.044
  12. O'Neill AC, Hayward V, Zhong T, et al. Usability of the internal mammary recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69:907-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.030
  13. Tomioka YK, Uda H, Yoshimura K, et al. Studying the blood pressures of antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels: Do they really work as recipient vessels? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70:1391-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.024
  14. Kropf N, Macadam SA, McCarthy C, et al. Influence of the recipient vessel on fat necrosis after breast reconstruction with a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2010;44:96-101. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844311003675354
  15. Lorenzetti F, Kuokkanen H, von Smitten K, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of blood flow in the internal mammary or thoracodorsal artery as a recipient vessel for a free TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:590-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200106000-00003