DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Network with Central City on Urban Growth

중심도시와의 네트워크가 도시성장에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2018.07.04
  • Accepted : 2019.04.11
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

The development of science and transportation technology leads to the increase of inter - city networks that play an important role in urban growth. Overall, numerous studies based on network theory pay attention to positive effects of urban network on urban growth. However, some studies have pointed out the negative effects of inter-city interactions such as straw effects. This implies that the network between cities may not be positively correlated with urban growth, and that the direction of the influence may vary from a certain threshold, such as the marginal utility curve. In this context, the purpose of this study is to measure the impacts of network with central city on urban growth in the capital region and examine the relationship between urban network and growth. Two multiple regression models are employed with changes in population and employment as dependent variables. The urban network index and other control variables are used as independent variables. Especially, the urban network indexes are used in quadratic forms to examine non linear relations with urban growth such U-shape or an inverted U-shape. The results show that the relationships between networks with the central city and urban growth are not a simple linear, and the influence can be changed from the critical point.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, D.J., Kwon, Y.S., Ahn, H.K., Gu, J.E., Choi, I.H., and Jeon, S.Y., 2009. A Study on Mega-economic Region Development to Promote Korea's National Territorial Competitiveness, Sejong: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  2. Kim, Y., 2009. "Impacts of New Expressway on Regional Economies: Straw Effect", Journal of Social Science, 35(3): 129-148. https://doi.org/10.15820/khjss.2009.35.3.006
  3. Eom, H.T. and Woo, M.J., 2015. "The Impacts of Urban Sprawl on the Decline of Inner City and Implications for Urban Regeneration: Focused on the Capital Region of South Korea", Journal of Korea Planning Association, 50(3): 73-89.
  4. Yun, J.J. and Woo, M.J., 2017. "Functional Interdependence and Employment Growth of Mega-economic Regions: Implications for Regional Planning", Journal of Korea Planning Association, 52(2): 117-136. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2017.04.52.2.117
  5. Jung, K.J. and Jeong, M.G., 2010. "An Analysis on Economic Effect of Urban Collaborative Network for Great-sphere Economic Areal Policy in Korea: Focusing on the Case of Southeastern Great-sphere Economic Area", Korean Policy Studies Review, 19(1): 313-339.
  6. Cho, B.S., Hong, S.H., and Lee, M.H., 2015. "Reinterpretation of Korean Spatial Structure Based on Urban Network Approaches: Focused on Conglomerate Business Networking", Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, 27(1): 1-22.
  7. Jo, J.W. and Woo, M.J., 2014. "The Impacts of High Speed Rail on Regional Economy and Balanced Development: Focused on Gyeongbu and Gyeongjeon Lines of Korea Train Express(KTX)", Journal of Korea Planning Association, 49(5): 263-278.
  8. Choi. B.D., 2015. "Theory of Network City and Perspective on Development of the Yeongnam Region", Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 21(1): 1-20.
  9. Alonso, W., 1973. "Urban Zero Population Growth", Daedalus, 2(4): 191-206.
  10. Batten, D.F., 1995. "Network Cities: Creative Urban Agglomerations for the 21st Century", Urban Studies, 32(2): 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989550013103
  11. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D., and Fink, G., 2010. "Implications of Population Ageing for Economic Growth", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(4): 583-612. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grq038
  12. Bontje, M. and Musterd, S., 2008. "The Multi-layered City: The Value of Old Urban Profiles", Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(2): 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00457.x
  13. Capello, R. and Camagni, R., 2000. "Beyond Optimal City Size: An Evaluation of Alternative Urban Growth Patterns", Urban Studies, 37(9): 1479-1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080221
  14. Christaller, W., 1933. Central Places in Southern Germany, Translated by Carlisle W.B., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  15. Fraser, C., 2003. "Change in the European Industrial City", in Urban Regeneration in Europe, edited by Couch, C., Fraser, C., and Percy, S., 17-33, Oxford: Blackwell.
  16. Glaeser, E.L. and Gyourko, J., 2005. "Urban Decline and Durable Housing", Journal of Political Economy, 113(2): 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1086/427465
  17. Meijers, E.J., Burger, M.J., and Hoogerbrugge, M.M., 2016. "Borrowing Size in Networks of Cities: City Size, Network Connectivity and Metropolitan Functions in Europe", Papers in Regional Science, 95(1): 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12181
  18. Meijers, E.J. and Burger, M.J., 2017. "Stretching the Concept of 'Borrowed Size'", Urban Studies, 54(1): 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015597642
  19. Myrdal, G., 1957. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions, London: Duckworth.
  20. O'sullivan, A., 2015. Urban Economics, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  21. Ross, C.L. and Woo, M., 2009. "Identifying Megaregions in the US: Implications for Infrastructure Investment", in Megaregions: Planning for Global Competitiveness, edited by Catherine L. Ross, 53-80, Washington D.C.: Island Press.