DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Resistance of Terpenoids to Various Abiotic Stresses in Chamaecyparis obtusa

  • Min, Ji Yun (Division of Environmental Forest Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Dong Jin (Department of Seed and Seedling Management, National Forest Seed and Variety Center) ;
  • Yong, Seong Hyeon (Division of Environmental Forest Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Yang, Woo Hyeong (Division of Environmental Forest Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Seol, Yuwon (Division of Environmental Forest Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Choi, Eunji (Division of Environmental Forest Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Hak Gon (Forest Research Department, Gyeongsangnam-do Forest Environment Research Institute) ;
  • Choi, Myung Suk (Division of Environmental Forest Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2019.01.18
  • Accepted : 2019.03.20
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Chamaecyparis obtusa is one of the economical conifers planted in Korea due to its good quality timber and wood characteristics. Individuals of C. obtusa containing high terpenes (HT) and low terpenes (LT) were selected for by colorimetric method. The HT of C. obtusa was delayed in wilting against various abiotic stresses compared to the LT plants. The HT group exposed to UV did not significant influence the chlorophyll content, and the chlorophyll value was higher in the HT group than the LT group. Also, chilling treatment (5℃) did not significant influence on the chlorophyll content. However treatment at -4℃ showed relatively low chlorophyll content in the LT group than the HT group. Plants exposure to high temperature was not a difference between the HT and the LT group. However, treatment at 38℃ influenced the chlorophyll content that was increased exposure time-dependently. In salt treatments, chlorophyll in the HT group was lower at high concentrations (300 and 500 mM) of NaCl. However, chlorophyll content increased to slightly in treatment time-dependently, which is 6.7% to 40%. H2O2 treatment has been a negative effect on the chlorophyll content in the HT group. All concentration of H2O2 decreased the chlorophyll content of 5% to 35%. Plants containing high terpenoids were resisted against some abiotic stress such as salt and H2O2. Our results implied that terpenoids could cause various abiotic stress resistance. These results could be utilized for efficient management and biomass production during forest silvicultures.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrade S and Santos C. 2003. The effects of salt and osmotic stresses on carbohydrate metabolism. I. Symposium on insular ecosystems. Book of Abstracts. Porto Santo, Portugal.
  2. Blandt S, Wagner H and Zgainski EM. 1984. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas. pp.384. Eds. Springer. NY. USA.
  3. Bolwell GP and Wojtaszek P. 1997. Mechanism for the generation of reactive oxygen species in plant defence - a broad perspective. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 51: 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1997.0129
  4. Breton G, Danyluk J, Ouellet F and Sarhan F. 2000. Biotechnological applications of plant freezing associated proteins. Biotechnol Annu Rev. 6: 59-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-2656(00)06019-1
  5. Copolovici L, Kannaste A, Pazouki L and Niinemets U. 2012. Emissions of green leaf volatiles and terpenoids from Solanum lycopersicum are quantitatively related to the severity of cold and heat shock treatments. J. Plant Physiol. 169: 664-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.019
  6. Copolovici LO, Filella I, Llusia J, Niinemets U and Penuelas J. 2005. The capacity for thermal protection of photosynthetic electron transport varies for different monoterpenes in Quercus ilex. Plant Physiol. 139: 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.065995
  7. Dolzhenko Y, Bertea CM, Occhipinti A, Bossi S and Maftei ME. 2010. UV-B modulates the interplay between terpenoids and flavonoids in peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.). J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. Biol. 100: 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.05.003
  8. Fall R, Karl T, Hansel A, Jordan A and Lindinger W. 1999. Volatile organic compounds emitted after leaf wounding: On-line analysis by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 104: 15963-15974. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900144
  9. Feng DR, Liu B, Li WY, He YM, Qi KB, Wang HB and Wang JF. 2009. Over-expression of cold-induced plasma membrane protein gene (MpRCI) from plantain enhances low temperature-resistance in transgenic tobacco. Environ. Exp. Bot. 65: 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.009
  10. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G and Sharkey TD. 2004. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 6: 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820867
  11. Georgieva K and Lichtenthaler HK. 1999. Photosynthetic activity and acclimation ability of pea plants to low and high temperature treatment as studied by means of chlorophyll fluorescence. J. Plant Physiol. 155: 416-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80125-4
  12. Holopainen JK and Gershenzon J. 2010. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 15: 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.01.006
  13. Koewsuksaeng S, Vrano Y, Aiamla-or S, Shigyo M and Yamauchi N. 2011. Ettect of UV-B irradiation on Chlorophyll-degrading enzyme activities and postharvest quality in stored lime (Citrus latitalia Tan.) trait. Postharrest Biol. Technol. 61: 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.02.014
  14. Kesselmeier J and Staudt M. 1999. Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC): an overview on emission, physiology and ecology. J. Atmos. Chem. 33: 23-88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006127516791
  15. Kim TU. 2002. The woody plants of Korea. pp.38. eds. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co. JJ. KOR.
  16. Knighy H and Knight MR. 2001. Abiotic stress signalling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci. 6: 262-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(01)01946-X
  17. Kumar-Tewari A and Charan-Tripathy B. 1998. Temperature-stress-induced impairment of chlorophyll biosynthetic reaction in cucumber and wheat. Plant Physiol. 117: 851-858. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.3.851
  18. Kuznetsov VV, Khydyrov BT, Shevyakova NI and Rakitin VY. 1991. Heat shock induction by of salt tolerance in cotton - involvement of polyamines, ethylene, and proline. Soviet Plant Physiol. 38: 1203-1210.
  19. Lavine A, Tenhaken R, Dixon R and Lamb C. 1994. H2O2 from the oxidative burst orchestrates the plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Cell. 79: 583-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90544-4
  20. Llusia J, Penuelas J, Asensio D and Munne-Bosch S. 2005. Airborne limonene confers limited thermotolerance to Quercus ilex. Physiol. Plant. 123: 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00426.x
  21. Loreto F and Schnitzler JP. 2010. Abiotic stress and induced BVOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 15: 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.006
  22. Loreto F and Velikova V. 2001. Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Plant Physiol. 127: 1781-1787. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010497
  23. Loreto F, Barta C, Brilli F and Nogues I. 2006. On the induction of volatile organic compound emissions by plants as consequence of wounding or fluctuations of light and temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 29: 1820-1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01561.x
  24. Marchner H and Possingham JV. 1975. Effects of K and Na on the growth of leaf discs of sugar beet and spinach. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 75: 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-328X(75)80070-5
  25. Maruyama E, Ishii K and Hosoi Y. 2005. Efficient plant regeneration of Hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) via somatic embryogenesis. J. For. Res. 10: 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-004-0105-z
  26. Santos CV. 2004. Regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation by salt stress in sunflower leaves. Sci. Hortic. 103: 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.009
  27. Singh K, Foley RC and Onate-Sanchez L. 2002. Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5: 430-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00289-3
  28. Thomashow MF. 2002. So what's new in the field of plant cold acclimation? Lots! Plant Physiol. 125: 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.1.89
  29. Tiiva P, Rinnan R, Faubert P, Rasanen J, Holopainen T, Kyro E and Holopainen JK. 2007. Isoprene emission from a subarctic peatland under enhanced UV-B radiation. New Phytol. 176: 346-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02164.x
  30. Vickers CE, Gershenzon J, Lerdau MT and Loreto F. 2009. A unified mechanism of action for volatile isoprenoids in plant atiotic stress. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5: 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.158
  31. Vranova E, Inze D and Van Breusegem F. 2002. Signal transduction during oxidative stress. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 1227-1236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/53.372.1227
  32. Zhao J and Sakai K. 2003. Multiple signalling pathways mediate fungal elicitor-induced beta-thujaplicin biosynthesis in Cupressus lusitanica cell cultures. J. Exp. Bot. 54: 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg062
  33. Zhao J, Fujita K and Sakai K. 2005. Oxidative stress in plant cell culture: a role in production of β-thujaplicin by Cupressus lusitanica suspension culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90: 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20465