Journal of agriculture & life science (농업생명과학연구)

Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University (경상대학교 농업생명과학연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on the Status of Joint Forestry Project in National Forest

국유림 공동산림사업 실태분석에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Dong-Hyeon (Department of Ecology and Environment System, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ko, Chi-Ung (Division of forest Industry research, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Geun (Department of Ecology and Environment System, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김동현 (경북대학교 상주캠퍼스 일반대학원 생태환경시스템학과) ;
  • 고치웅 (국립산림과학원 산림산업연구과) ;
  • 김동근 (경북대학교 상주캠퍼스 생태환경시스템학부)
  • Received : 2019.08.09
  • Accepted : 2019.11.01
  • Published : 2019.12.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the status of the joint forest project, which is one of the national forest management system, by using stakeholder participation, transparency of decision making, accountability of actors and stakeholders, The questionnaire survey was conducted using the 5 - point scale and the written form. As a result of the questionnaire survey, various stakeholder participation items had the highest opportunity to participate with an average of 3.3 and the lowest score with 2.3 points for establishing conflict and conflict resolution structures. Transparency was analyzed to be 3.4 points for the project disclosure, 2.7 points for information sharing and education promotion activities for local residents, 3.3 points for the detailed role of the project implementer, and 2.7 points for internal and external monitoring and evaluation of the project with various stakeholders. The results of this research, analyzed through the participatory forest management index, are deemed to be used as basic data for the establishment of a plan for the revitalization of national forest participation management.

본 연구는 국유림경영제도 중 하나인 공동산림사업의 실태분석을 위해 참여형 산림관리 원칙인 이해관계자의 참여, 의사결정의 투명성, 행위자와 이해관계자의 책무성을 이용하여 공동산림사업 업무담당자를 대상으로 Likert 5점 척도와 기입식으로 구성된 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사 결과, 이해관계자 참여(10문항) 항목에서는 다양한 이해관계자가 참여할 수 있는 기회제공이 평균 3.3으로 가장 높게 나타났고, 분쟁 및 갈등 해결 구조 구축이 2.3점으로 가장 낮은 점수를 나타냈다. 투명성(7문항)은 사업에 대한 정보공개가 3.4점, 지역주민을 대상으로 한 정보공유, 교육·홍보활동이 2.7점으로 분석되었으며, 마지막으로 책무성(7문항)에서는 공동사업수행자의 자세한 역할규명 여부가 3.3점, 다양한 이해관계자와 함께 사업에 대한 내·외부 모니터링 및 평가 여부가 2.7점으로 분석되었다. 참여형 산림관리지표를 통해 분석된 본 연구결과는 추후 국유림 참여경영의 활성화를 위한 계획수립에 기초자료로써 활용될 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ban YU. 2003. An alternative approach to public participation in the decision making of environment based on American cases. J. Korea Soc. Cvl. Eng. 51: 26-39.
  2. Beckley TM, Parkins JR and Sheppard SR.J. 2006. Public participation in sustainable forest management: a reference guide. Res. Rpt. KETE. Canada.
  3. Brown AL and Therivel. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology. J. Imp. Ass. & Proj. Aprsl. 18: 183-189.
  4. Buchy M and Hoverman S. 2000. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. J. Forest Plc. & Econ. 1: 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00006-X
  5. Chaker A, EI-Fadl K, Chamas L and Hatijian B. 2006. A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries. J. Enviro. Imp. Ass. Rev. 26: 15-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.010
  6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2011. Framework for assessing and monitoring forest governance. Res. Rpt. FAO. UN.
  7. Heo CH. 2011. A study on improvement of management of national forests. J. Seoul Assoc. Publ. Admin. 2011: 213-245.
  8. Jung BH, Kim JS, Kim HG and Kim EG. 2011. A study on the importance-performance analysis for national forest complex management. J. Agri. & Life Sci. 45: 33-40.
  9. Kim JH, Tae YL, Chang CY and Kim KM. 2010. Study on the current status and direction of environmental governance around urban forest in Korea: with a focus on the recognition of local government officials. J. Korean Soc. Forest Sci. 99: 580-589.
  10. Kishor N and Rosenbaum K. 2012. Assessing and monitoring forest governance: a user's guide to a diagnostic tool. Res. rpt. FAO. UN.
  11. Lee KH, Lee NJ, Yu RH and Kim DG. 2015. Awareness survey on participatory national forest management revitalization. J. Agri & Life Sci. 49: 73-85.
  12. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (paper 2). 2002. Public participation in forestry in Europe and North America. Res. rpt. Ministerial Conf. Prot. Forests in Europe.
  13. Moon GY. 2005. Research about activation of national forest management system for multilateral participation. M.S dissertation, Chonnam National University, College Station, Chonnam.
  14. Mustalahti I and Lund JF. 2009. Where and how can participatory forest management succeed? learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos. J. Soc. & Natrl. Rc. 23: 31-44.
  15. Park KS, Lee SY, Choi SI, Kim HS, Jeong SM and An KW. 2010b. A study on the demander's consciousness of the national forest management system. J. Korean Soc. Forest Sci. 99: 380-390.
  16. Park KS, Lee SY, Choi SI, Moon GY, Jeong SM and An KW. 2009a. Analysis of the extent of national forest-official's recognition on the national forest management system. J. Korean Soc. Forest Sci. 98: 479-490.
  17. Park KS, Lee SY, Choi SI, Song YG and An KW. 2010. How to activate national forest management through multilateral participation. Res. rpt. Korea Forest Res. Inst.
  18. Park MS, Lee KH and Kim DG. 2015. Awareness and legal framework to participation in national forest management. J. Korea Environment. Plc. & Admin. Soc. 2015: 61-72.
  19. Rametsteiner E. 2009. Governance concepts and their application in forest policy initiatives from global to local levels. J. SSF. 8: 143-158.
  20. Robinwood Plus. 2013a. Guidelines for participatory forest management. Res. rpt. E U.
  21. Robinwood Plus. 2013b. Recommnedations for the European commission. Res. rpt. E U.
  22. Secco L and Pettenella D. 2006. Participatory processes in forest management: the Italian experience in defining and implementing forest certification schemes. J. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen. 157: 445-452. https://doi.org/10.3188/szf.2006.0445
  23. Secco L, Da Re R, Pettenella D and Gatto P. 2014. Why and how to measure forest governance at local level: a set of indicators. J. Forest Plc. & Econ. 49: 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.006
  24. Seok HD, Koo JC, Jeong JH, Choi JY, Kwak JY, Lee SY and Kim NR. 2015. Development plan for community based forest management in Korea(year 2 of 2). Res. rpt. Korea Rur. Econ. Inst.
  25. Seok HD and Park SH. 2013. A study on the establishment of cooperative forest management governance. Res. rpt. Korea Rur. Econ. Inst.
  26. Wily LA. 2002 Participatory forest management in Africa: an overview of progress and issues. Sec. Int. Wksh. Prtc. Forestry in Africa.