한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.98-101
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In Vitro: Antimicrobial Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius on Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

  • Seo, Haeyoung (Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Bae, Seulgi (Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Oh, Taeho (Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.08
  • 심사 : 2019.02.20
  • 발행 : 2019.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Lactobacillus spp. are the bacteria most commonly used as probiotics and it has been proven that they inhibit pathogenic bacterial growth and improve skin repair in humans. This study was conducted to investigate the growth inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus on Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, the most commonly isolated pathogen in canine pyoderma, and whether Lactobacillus could inhibit the adhesion capability of S. pseudintermedius to canine corneocytes. For this study, L. salivarius and S. pseudintermedius were isolated from healthy beagle fecal samples and the skin surface of dogs with skin infection, respectively. S. pseudintermedius was co-cultured with L. salivarius to assess the inhibitory effect. For the adhesion assay, corneocytes were collected from healthy beagle ventral abdominal skin. Both bacterial species attached to corneocytes and were assessed in number. As a result, L. salivarius significantly inhibited the growth of S. pseudintermedius in the culture medium. Moreover, L. salivarius reduced attachment of S. pseudintermedius in the adhesion assay. These results suggest that L. salivarius has an inhibitory effect on S. pseudintermedius and may be effectively used in the topical therapy of canine skin infections.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bannoehr J, Guardabassi L. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in the dog: taxonomy, diagnostics, ecology, epidemiology and pathogenicity. Vet Dermatol 2012; 23: 253-e252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01046.x
  2. Baur M, Zink R, Auzanneau I, Buffard K. Agent for the anti-adhesion of skin pathogenic flora. U.S. Patent No. 8,685,389. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  3. Beasley S, Manninen T, Saris P. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from canine faeces. J Appl Microbiol 2006; 101: 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02884.x
  4. Caramia G, Atzei A, Fanos V. Probiotics and the skin. Clin Dermatol 2008; 26: 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.10.008
  5. Cho SH, Strickland I, Boguniewicz M, Leung DY. Fibronectin and fibrinogen contribute to the enhanced binding of Staphylococcus aureus to atopic skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 108: 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2001.117455
  6. Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriolf 1989; 66: 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  7. Gourbeyre P, Denery S, Bodinier M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: impact on the gut immune system and allergic reactions. J Leukoc Biol 2011; 89: 685-695. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1109753
  8. Jones SE, Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiol 2009; 9: 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-35
  9. Kang MS, Oh HJ, Lee HC and Oh JS. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria inhibiting the proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Bacteriol Virol 2009; 39: 11-19. https://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2009.39.1.11
  10. Krutmann J. Pre-and probiotics for human skin. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 54: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.01.002
  11. McEwan N, Kalna G, Mellor D. A comparison of adherence by four strains of Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus hominis to canine corneocytes collected from normal dogs and dogs suffering from atopic dermatitis. Res Vet Sci 2005; 78: 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.09.002
  12. Nes IF, Diep DB, Havarstein LS, Brurberg MB, Eijsink V, Holo H. Biosynthesis of bacteriocins in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1996; 70: 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395929
  13. Prescott S, Dunstan J, Hale J, Breckler L, Lehmann H, Weston S, Richmond P. Clinical effects of probiotics are associated with increased interferon-$\gamma$ responses in very young children with atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2005; 35: 1557-1564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02376.x
  14. Ren D, Li C, Qin Y, Yin R, Li X, Tian M, Du S, Guo H, Liu C, Zhu N. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus adherence to Caco-2 cells by lactobacilli and cell surface properties that influence attachment. Anaerobe 2012; 18: 508-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.08.001
  15. Siebold M, Pv F, Joppien R, Rindfleisch D, Schugerl K, Roper H. Comparison of the production of lactic acid by three different lactobacilli and its recovery by extraction and electrodialysis. Process Biochem 1995; 30: 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-9592(95)87011-3
  16. Simou C, Thoday KL, Forsythe PJ, Hill PB. Adherence of Staphylococcus intermedius to corneocytes of healthy and atopic dogs: effect of pyoderma, pruritus score, treatment and gender. Vet Dermatol 2005; 16: 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2005.00484.x
  17. Stanojevic-Nikolic S, Dimic G, Mojovic L, Pejin J, Djukic-Vukovic A, Kocic-Tanackov S. Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid against pathogen and spoilage microorganisms. J Food Process Pres 2016; 40: 990-998. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12679
  18. Weese JS. The canine and feline skin microbiome in health and disease. Advances in Vet Dermatol 2013; 7: 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118644317.ch19