DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory

한국어판 아동학대 잠재성 도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증

  • Lee, Sona (Graduate School, College of Nursing, Eulji University) ;
  • Ahn, Hye Young (College of Nursing, Eulji University)
  • 이소나 (을지대학교 대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 안혜영 (을지대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.03
  • Accepted : 2018.10.09
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents methodological research that aimed to verify the content validity, construct validity, reliability, and criterion-related validity of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI), originally developed by Milner and then translated into Korean by Ahn. Methods: Data used in this study were collected from 209 mothers of infants, toddlers, and children of preschool age in D metropolitan city. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. Results: The Korean version of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (K-CAPI) was developed by condensing 44 of the original 77 CAPI items. Four factors of K-CAPI were extracted using principal component analysis. These 4 factors-distress; problems with child, self, family, and others; unhappiness; rigidity-accounted for 54.01% of variance. The Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ was .96, the Guttman split-half coefficient was .88, and test-retest reliability was r=.86 (p<.001). Conclusion: The results of this study established the reliability and validity of the K-CAPI and found it to be an appropriate tool to evaluate mothers' potential to abuse their children.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim DS. A study on the solution of child abuse problems appearing in social problems. Industry Promotion Research. 2018;3(2):41-51. https://doi.org/10.21186/IPR.2018.3.2.041
  2. Jung EC, Lee C. Analysis of news frame of child abuse and finding an alternative: Focusing on Pyeongtaek child abuse crime case. Korean Journal of Broadcasting. 2017;31(2):77-108.
  3. National Child Protection Agency. 2016 The state report on the state of child abuse. Survey Report. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2017 November. Report No.: 11-1352000-000025-10.
  4. Park S, Park YH. The relationship among rearing environment attachment and self-identity. Journal of Humanistic Studies. 2005;19:39-60.
  5. Park SJ, Kang KA. Development of a measurement instrument for parenting behavior of primary caregivers in early childhood. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2015;45(5):650-660. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.5.650
  6. Klika JB, Herrenkohl TI, Lee JO. School factors as moderators of the relationship between physical child abuse and pathways of antisocial behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2013;28(4): 852-867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512455865
  7. Jung JH, Kwak YH. Review of the screening tool for child abuse by health care provider. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Journal. 2015; 2(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.22470/pemj.2015.2.1.1
  8. Kim HK, Choi H, Park HJ. A systematic review of child abuse screening instruments. Child Health Nursing Research. 2016;22(4): 265-278. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2016.22.4.265
  9. Anderst J, Dowd MD, Schnitzer P, Tryon T. Preliminary development of a rapid assessment of supervision scale for young children. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1517-e1524. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2880
  10. Louwers EC, Korfage IJ, Affourtit MJ, Ruige M, van den Elzen AP, de Koning HJ, et al. Accuracy of a screening instrument to identify potential child abuse in emergency departments. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2014;38(7):1275-1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.11.005
  11. Sittig JS, Post ED, Russel IM, van Dijk IA, Nieuwenhuis EE, van de Putte EM. Evaluation of suspected child abuse at the ED; implementation of American academy of pediatrics guidelines in the Netherlands. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014; 32(1):64-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2013.08.038
  12. Milner JS, Gold RG, Wimberley RC. Prediction and explanation of child abuse: Cross-validation of the child abuse potential inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1986;54(6):865-866. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.6.865
  13. Ondersma SJ, Chaffin MJ, Mullins SM, LeBreton JM. A brief form of the child abuse potential inventory: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2005;34(2): 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3402_9
  14. Jang HJ, Lee JY. The development of a child abuse assessment scale (I). Journal of Korean Council for Children's Rights. 1999;3(1):77-96.
  15. Han IY, Park MS, Park HW, Yoo SK, Lee YW. Development of a physical abuse assessment scale for children. Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare. 2006;21:7-27.
  16. Milner JS. The child abuse potential inventory: Manual. 2nd ed. Dekalb, IL.: Psytec Corporation; 1986. p. 1-102.
  17. Ahn HY. Predictive model of child abuse in mothers [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University. 1998. p. 1-136.
  18. Yang BW. Instroduction and application of multivariate data analysis. 1sd ed. Seoul: Hakjisa; 1998. p. 1-402.
  19. Comrey AL, Lee, HB. A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992. p. 1-217.
  20. Milner JS. An ego-strength scale for the child abuse potential inventory. Journal of Family Violence. 1988;3(2):151-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994032
  21. Lee EO, Im NY, Park HA, Lee IS, Kim JI, Bae J, et al. Nursing research and statistical analysis. 4th ed. Paju: Soomoonsa; 2009. p. 1-790.
  22. McKelvie SJ. Graphic rating scales - How many categories? British Journal of Psychology. 1978;69(2):185-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb01647.x
  23. Simon HA. Models of discovery: And other topics in the methods of science. 2nd ed. Boston: Springer Science and Business Media; 2012. p. 1-475.
  24. Crase SJ, Clark SG, Pease D. Iowa parent behavior inventory manual. 1st ed. Iowa: Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.; 1978.
  25. Hong KO. Relationships among maternal self-perception, parenting behavior, kindergartener's temperament and social competence. Korean Journal of Child Studies. 2001;22(2):181-194.
  26. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009. p. 1-821.
  27. Bae BR. Structural equation modeling with Amos 19: Principles and practice. 1st ed. Seoul: Chungram Books; 2011. p. 1-668.