The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제11권2호
  • /
  • Pages.95-104
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations

  • Jeong, Ki-Won (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.15
  • 심사 : 2019.03.12
  • 발행 : 2019.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. To evaluate the effect of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength and to measure the fracture toughness of CAD/CAM provisional restoration materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four CAD/CAM (3D printing: Nextdent C&B and ZMD-1000B Temporary, CAD/CAM resin block: Yamahachi PMMA disk and Huge PMMA block) and four conventional (monometacrylate: Jet and Alike, dimetacrylate: Luxatemp and Protemp 4) materials were selected to fabricate disk-shaped specimens and divided into six groups according to surface treatment (n=10). CAD/CAM materials were repaired with Jet or Luxatemp, while conventional materials were repaired with their own materials. The shear bond strength was measured by using universal testing machine. Ten rectangular column-shaped specimens for each material were fabricated to measure the fracture toughness by single edge v notched beam technique. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. RESULTS. The highest shear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials was achieved by SiC paper + sandblasting. It was also accomplished when repairing 3D printing materials with Luxatemp, and repairing CAD/CAM resin blocks with Jet. Yamahachi PMMA disk showed the highest fracture toughness. Nextdent C&B showed the lowest fracture toughness value but no statistically significant difference from Alike and Luxatemp (P>.05). CONCLUSION. In order to successfully repair the CAD/CAM provisional restoration, mechanical surface treatment and appropriate repair material according to the CAD/CAM material type should be selected. The CAD/CAM provisional materials have proper mechanical properties for clinical use as compared to conventional materials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Orsi IA, Soares RG, Villabona CA, Panzeri H. Evaluation of the flexural strength and elastic modulus of resins used for temporary restorations reinforced with particulate glass fibre. Gerodontology 2012;29:e63-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00410.x
  2. Regish KM, Sharma D, Prithviraj DR. Techniques of fabrication of provisional restoration: an overview. Int J Dent 2011;2011:134659.
  3. Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:760-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002
  4. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:559-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
  5. Lee WS, Lee DH, Lee KB. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:265-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
  6. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 2016;32:54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018
  7. Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:242-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.005
  8. Park JM, Hong YS, Park EJ, Heo SJ, Oh N. Clinical evaluations of cast gold alloy, machinable zirconia, and semiprecious alloy crowns: A multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:684-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.018
  9. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
  10. Berman B. 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business Horizons 2012;55:155-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003
  11. Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2
  12. Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:208-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.030
  13. Koumjian JH, Nimmo A. Evaluation of fracture resistance of resins used for provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:654-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90290-S
  14. Gegauff AG, Wilkerson JJ. Fracture toughness testing of visible light- and chemical-initiated provisional restoration resins. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:62-8.
  15. Moon JE, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effects of airborne-particle abrasion protocol choice on the surface characteristics of monolithic zirconia materials and the shear bond strength of resin cement. Ceram Int 2016;42:1552-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.104
  16. Ha SR, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS. Improving shear bond strength of temporary crown and fixed dental prosthesis resins by surface treatments. J Mater Sci 2016;51:1463-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9466-2
  17. Chen HL, Lai YL, Chou IC, Hu CJ, Lee SY. Shear bond strength of provisional restoration materials repaired with light-cured resins. Oper Dent 2008;33:508-15. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-130
  18. Im YW, Jun SK, Kim SC, Kim DA, Kim GR, Kim NS, Lee HH. Standardized test methods for mechanical properties of dental prosthetic/restorative materials and their applications. Korean J Dent Mater 2015;42:259-70. https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2015.42.3.259
  19. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:122-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70224-5
  20. Ozcan M. Evaluation of alternative intra-oral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:194-203. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01037.x
  21. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:699-705. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00299.x
  22. Suliman AH, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:118-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8
  23. Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:90-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00073.x
  24. Ataol AS, Ergun G. Repair bond strength of resin composite to bilayer dental ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10:101-12. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.101
  25. Lee YG, Moon SR, Cho YG. Effect of cutting instruments on the dentin bond strength of a self-etch adhesive. J Korean Acad Cons Dent 2010;35:13-9. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.1.013
  26. Gregory WA, Pounder B, Bakus E. Bond strengths of chemically dissimilar repaired composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:664-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90292-K
  27. da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 2012;40:513-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.001
  28. Ozcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, Barbosa SH, Bottino MA. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1751-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0863-5
  29. Bacchi A, Consani RL, Sinhoreti MA, Feitosa VP, Cavalcante LM, Pfeifer CS, Schneider LF. Repair bond strength in aged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:447-52. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a29590
  30. Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Mohammadi N, Rikhtegaran S, Bahari M, Oskoee PA, Vahedpour H. Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin. Lasers Med Sci 2015; 30:653-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1391-5
  31. Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:21-7.
  32. Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 1992;8:362-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90020-D
  33. Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Navajas-Rodriguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:481-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116775
  34. Oztas N, Alacam A, Bardakcy Y. The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. Oper Dent 2003;28:149-54.
  35. Azarbal P, Boyer DB, Chan KC. The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaired composites. Dent Mater 1986;2:153-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80025-2
  36. Saunders WP1. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Dent 1990;18:158-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(90)90059-N
  37. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Roberson TM. Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater 1989;5:417-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90113-9
  38. Eli I, Liberman R, Levi N, Haspel Y. Bond strength of joined posterior light-cured composites: comparison of surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:185-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90313-7
  39. Hisamatsu N, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Effect of silane primers and unfilled resin bonding agents on repair bond strength of a prosthodontic microfilled composite. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:644-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00899.x
  40. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23:1276-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007
  41. Lee HY, Han GJ, Chang J, Son HH. Bonding of the silane containing multi-mode universal adhesive for lithium disilicate ceramics. Restor Dent Endod 2017;42:95-104. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.95
  42. El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Hassan FM, Feilzer AJ. The effect of adhesives with various degrees of hydrophilicity on resin ceramic bond durability. Dent Mater. 2004;20:778-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.010
  43. Takahashi M1, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent 2011;39:506-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.008
  44. Fahmy NZ, Sharawi A. Effect of two methods of reinforcement on the fracture strength of interim fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2009;18:512-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00468.x
  45. Balkenhol M, Kohler H, Orbach K, Wostmann B. Fracture toughness of cross-linked and non-cross-linked temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:917-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.099
  46. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater 2018;34:192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003

피인용 문헌

  1. Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments vol.12, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.273
  2. Bonding of conventional provisional resin to 3D printed resin: the role of surface treatments and type of repair resins vol.12, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.322
  3. Shear force comparative evaluation for surface treated and non- treated 3D interim printed materials with different types of glass-ionomer cements vol.12, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57003
  4. Comparison of shear bond strengths of different types of denture teeth to different denture base resins vol.12, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.6.376
  5. 치과용 재료의 적층가공에 대한 문헌고찰 vol.37, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2021.37.1.1
  6. Bonding Interface and Repairability of 3D-Printed Intraoral Splints: Shear Bond Strength to Current Polymers, with and without Ageing vol.14, pp.14, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143935
  7. Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance between CAD/CAM Materials for Interim Fixed Prosthesis vol.14, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247791