Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Self-Regulating Learning Ability of General English and Spanish Learners in the Flipped Learning Strategy

거꾸로 학습 전략에 있어서 교양영어와 교양스페인어 학습자의 자기조절 학습능력에 관한 연구

  • 신명희 (한남대학교 탈메이지 교양교육대학) ;
  • 강필운 (한국외국어대학교 스페인어과)
  • Received : 2019.03.05
  • Accepted : 2019.04.20
  • Published : 2019.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how flipped learning strategy affects learners' self-regulating ability in both general English and Spanish, based on the study hypothesis that self-regulating learning ability of general English learners will make a meaningful difference in comparison to that of traditional learning. The study was also focused on how flipped learning was related to learners' self-regulating ability. From September 10, 2018 to December 10, 2018, a total of 81 students in general English and Spanish were surveyed in which three sub areas of self-regulating learning (cognitive, motivational, and behavioral control) were considered, and which were divided into six sub-domains, a total of 65 items were composed. Although not very significant results were shown in the case of motivational control, both English and Spanish classes have statistically significant differences in cognitive and behavioral self-regulating learning abilities.

이 연구의 목적은 거꾸로 학습(Flipped Learning) 전략에 있어서 교양영어 학습자의 자기조절학습 능력이 전통 학습(Traditional Learning) 있어서의 자기조절학습 능력과 비교했을 때 유의미한 차이를 가져올 것이라는 연구 가설을 바탕으로 본 연구에서는 교양영어와 교양스페인어에 있어서 거꾸로 학습 전략이 학습자의 자기조절능력에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 고찰해보았다. 2018년 9월 10일부터 2018년 12월10일까지 교양 영어와 교양스페인어 수강생 총 81명을 대상으로 하였으며 사전 사후 자기조절 테스트를 통해서 1) 인지조절능력, 2) 동기조절능력, 3) 행동조절능력 세 개의 영역의 변화를 고찰했고 3개의 영역은 6개 하위영역, 총 65개의 항목으로 구성된다. 연구결과, 자기조절학습능력에 있어서 동기 조절의 경우 유의미한 결과가 나타나지 않았지만, 영어와 스페인어 수업 모두 인지 및 행동조절 학습능력에 있어서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다.

Keywords

Table 1. General characteristics of subjects

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Reliabilities

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. The questions in the self-regulated learning

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Cognitive regulation: Self-regulated learning of learning contents

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Cognitive regulation: Self-regulated learning of confirming understanding

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Motivation Regulation: Self-regulated learning of interest and satisfaction

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Motivation Regulation: Self-regulated learning of investment of energy

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Behavior Regulation: Self-regulated learning of time management

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Behavior Regulation: Self-regulated learning of learning persistency ability

OHHGBW_2019_v10n4_73_t0009.png 이미지

References

  1. B. J. Zimmerman. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocess. Contemporary, Educational Psychology, 11, 307-313. DOI: org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
  2. D. W. Brooks. (1997). Web-teaching. Plenum Press. New York & London.
  3. D. H. Schunk. (1995). Inherent details of self-regulated learning including student perceptions. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
  4. J. M. Magogwe & R. Oliver. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003
  5. M. H. Yang. (2002). The Study on Conceptualization of Self-Regulated Learning using LISREL. The Society of Educational Psychology, 6(2), 259-290.
  6. J. Kuhl. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self- regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In: J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, Editors, Action control: From cognition to behavior Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 101-128.
  7. H. J. Kim. (2011). The Structural Relationship among Teacher-student Relationships, Learning Motivation and Learning Flow. Sookmyung Women's University Ph.D. thesis.
  8. J. Bergmann, & A. Sam. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Research Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
  9. N. Hamdan, K. Mcknight & K. M. Arfstrom. (2018). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled a review of flipped learning. Retrieved October 11, 2018 from http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp-content/uploads/WhitePaper_FlippedLearning.pdf.
  10. M. H. Shin. (2018). An Analysis of the Effects of On-Off line Convergence Learning Activities Based on Students' Learning Styles. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(2), 86.
  11. J. Strayer. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments, 15(2), 2012.Society for education technology, 20(3), 103-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
  12. M. K. Lee. (2014). Signification of Flipped classroom by sociology of classroom: Focusing on the experience of teachers, Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 181-207. https://doi.org/10.32465/ksocio.2014.24.2.007
  13. J. B. Choi & C. Kang. (2016). A Study on Elements and Procedure of Instruction Consulting for Successful Flipped Learning, Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(2).
  14. B. K. Kim. (2014). Development of Flipped Classroom Model for Teaching Profession Courses, The Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 25-56.
  15. S. H. Yang. (2003). Materiales de multimedia para la ensenanza de la destreza de expresion oral del espanol, The Journal of Latin America, Seoul National University, 14, 134-151.
  16. J. B. Choi. (2013). The Development and Effectiveness of Smart Learning-Based Intrapersonal Intelligence Enhancement Program using NLP Coaching Method, Chungbuk National University, Ph. D. Thesis.
  17. J. B. Choi & C. Kang. (2016). A Study on Elements and Procedure of Instruction Consulting for Successful Flipped Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(2).