디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권4호
  • /
  • Pages.291-298
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전략적 디자인 지원정책을 통한 디자이너-메이커스 비즈니스 활성화 방향 -청년 창의인력 취·창업지원사업을 중심으로-

Direction of Designer-makers Business Activation through Strategic Design Support Policy-Focusing on 'Young man's Creative Work & Startup Support Project'

  • 박준홍 (홍익대학교 국제디자인트렌드센터(IDTC)) ;
  • 전영옥 (고려사이버대학교 교양과정)
  • Park, Jun-Hong (International Design Trend Center(IDTC), Hongik University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Ok (Dept. of Culture & Arts Management, The Cyber University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.15
  • 심사 : 2019.04.20
  • 발행 : 2019.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 '청년 창의인력 취 창업지원사업' 분석을 통해 디자이너-메이커스 비즈니스 생태계 조성에 있어 정부 디자인 지원정책의 핵심 내용과 시사점을 고찰하고 있다. 메이커 기술에 기반한 디자인 브랜드 육성과 청년 주도형 지역 일자리 창출을 목적으로 하는 이 사례는 디자이너-메이커스가 보다 자유롭고 창의적인 분위기에서 창작활동이 가능하도록 창의문화 조성자로서 정부의 역할을 제시한다. 나아가 각 정부 부처에서 시행 중인 유사 메이커 지원정책들의 효율적인 통합 및 재편과 이를 실리적으로 추진할 로드맵의 필요성, 질적 내실화 지원의 중요성을 강조한다. 결과적으로, 디자이너-메이커스 비즈니스 활성화를 위한 정부의 디자인 지원정책은 신규 일자리를 창출하는 경제적 수치적 목표를 넘어 성숙한 공유문화를 토대로 한 지식재산의 질적 발전, 개방형 메이커 무브먼트에 기반 한 제조업의 신(新)생산 패러다임 모델 발굴이라는 진화된 지향점으로 발전해야 할 것이다.

This study discusses the core contents and implications of the design support policy of government in the creation of the designer-makers' business ecosystem through the analysis of 'Young man's Creative Work & Startup Support Project'. This case, which aims to cultivate a design brand based on maker technology and to create jobs for young people, suggests the role of government as a creative culture creator so that designer-makers are able to create creative activities in a more free and creative atmosphere. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the importance of efficient integration and reorganization of similar maker support policies implemented by each government department, the necessity of a roadmap for realizing this, and the support for quality improvement. As a result, the design support policy of government for the designer-makers' business activation should evolve into the qualitative development of intellectual property based on a mature shared culture and the discovery of a new production paradigm model of the manufacturing industry based on the open manufacturers beyond the economic and numerical goals of creating new jobs.

키워드

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_291_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Use state of creative makers space

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_291_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Participation status of ‘MAISON & OBJET 2015’

Table 1. Main contents of support project

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_291_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Project background and necessity

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_291_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Main content of 'Young man's Creative Work & Startup Support Project'

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_291_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Operation plan of creative maker space

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_291_t0004.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. C. Anderson. (Translated by T. K. Yun). (2013). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Seoul : RH Korea.
  2. D. Dougherty. (2011). The Maker Mindset. https://llk.media.mit.edu/courses/readings/maker-mindset.pdf.
  3. M. Hatch. (2013). The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. USA : McGraw-Hill Education.
  4. D. Lang. (2013). Zero to Maker: Learn (Just Enough) to Make (Just About) Anything. San Francisco : Maker Media.
  5. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. (2017). Promoting 'Maker Movement Activation' to Prepare for the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era.
  6. I. A. Kang, J. W. Hwang & H. S. Kim. (2016). Exploring the Possibility of TMSI Model as Maker Pedagogy : Focusing on High School Case. Korean Association for Educational Information and Media. Conference Proceedings, 116-176.
  7. K. Peppler, E. Halverson & Y. B. Kafai. (2016). Makeology : Makerspaces as learning environments. London : Routledge.
  8. I. A. Kang & H. S. Kim. (2017). Exploring the Value of the Maker Mindset at Maker Education. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(10), 250-267. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.10.250
  9. H. K. Choi. (2017). The Discursive Topography in Maker Culture a Critical Discourse Analysis of Maker Movement. Korean Journal of Communication & Information. 82. 73-103. https://doi.org/10.46407/kjci.2017.04.82.73
  10. B. Abel, L. Evers, R. Klaassen & P. Troxler. (Translated by S. H. Bae & H. A. Kim). (2015). Open Design Now. Seoul : Angraphics.
  11. Y. O. Jeon & K. Nha. (2017). The Open Design Approach for the Development of Resource Circulatory Design : Focusing on the Analysis of 'Design Goods Planning Exhibition Collaborated with The Nanugi & Alkenz' and 'Exhibition for the Use of Surplus'. Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art. 18(5), 515-526.
  12. M. J. Moon. Maker Culture and Maker Space : Create, Learn, Share! aliceon. http://aliceon.tistory.com/2469
  13. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. (2017. March). 2017 Infinite Imagination Room Operation Plan Science & Creativity, 234, 22-26.
  14. J. H. Lee. (2017.01.31). Young Man's New Search, Designer-maker. Kwang Nam Daily News. http://www.gwangnam.co.kr/read.php3?aid=1485848622251851125.
  15. Makezine.com. Makerspace Play Book: School Edition. https://makered.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Makerspace-Playbook-Feb-2013.pdf. 2013.
  16. L. Y. Yun. (2018). Movement for the Future, Maker Movement, Fusion Research Policy Center, 125, 3-5.
  17. J. Y. Park. (2017). Current Status and Meaning of Overseas Promotion of Maker Exercise and Maker Education. Education Policy Forum. 290. Seoul : Korea Educational Development Institute.