DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ductility demands and reduction factors for 3D steel structures with pinned and semi-rigid connections

  • Llanes-Tizoc, Mario D. (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa) ;
  • Reyes-Salazar, Alfredo (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa) ;
  • Ruiz, Sonia E. (Instituto de Ingenieria, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad Universitaria) ;
  • Bojorquez, Eden (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa) ;
  • Bojorquez, Juan (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa) ;
  • Leal Graciano, Jesus M. (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.27
  • 심사 : 2019.03.17
  • 발행 : 2019.04.25

초록

A numerical investigation regarding local (${\mu}_L$) and story (${\mu}_S$) ductility demand evaluation of steel buildings with perimeter moment resisting frames (PMRF) and interior gravity frames (IGF), is conducted in this study. The interior connections are modeled, firstly as perfectly pinned (PP), and then as semi-rigid (SR). Three models used in the SAC steel project, representing steel buildings of low-, mid-, and high-rise, are considered. The story ductility reduction factor ($R_{{\mu}S}$) as well as the ratio ($Q_{GL}$) of $R_{{\mu}S}$ to ${\mu}_L$ are calculated. ${\mu}_L$ and ${\mu}_S$, and consequently structural damage, at the PMRF are significant reduced when the usually neglected effect of SR connections is considered; average reductions larger than 40% are observed implying that the behavior of the models with SR connections is superior and that the ductility detailing of the PMRF doesn't need to be so stringent when SR connections are considered. $R_{{\mu}S}$ is approximately constant through height for low-rise buildings, but for the others it tends to increase with the story number contradicting the same proportion reduction assumed in the Equivalent Static Lateral Method (ESLM). It is implicitly assumed in IBC Code that the overall ductility reduction factor for ductile moment resisting frames is about 4; the results of this study show that this value is non-conservative for low-rise buildings but conservative for mid- and high-rise buildings implying that the ESLM fails evaluating the inelastic interstory demands. If local ductility capacity is stated as the basis for design, a value of 0.4 for $Q_{GL}$ seems to be reasonable for low- and medium-rise buildings.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : La Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa (UAS), Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

참고문헌

  1. Abdi, H., Hejazi, F., Saifulnaz, R., Karim, I.A. and Jaafar, M.S. (2015), "Response modification factor for steel structure equipped with viscous damper device", Int. J. Steel Struct., 15(3), 605-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-015-9008-4
  2. Abdollahzadeh, G. and Banihashemi, M. (2013), "Response modification factor of dual moment-resistant frame with buckling restrained brace (BRB)", Steel Compos. Struct., 14(6), 621-636. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.14.6.621
  3. Abdollahzadeh, G. and Faghihmaleki, H. (2014), "Response modification factor of SMRF improved with EBF and BRBs", J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., 6(4), 42-55.
  4. Arroyo-Espinoza, D. and Teran-Gilmore, A. (2003), "Strength reduction factors for ductile structures with passive energy dissipating devices", J. Earthq. Eng., 7(2), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460309350450
  5. ATC (Applied Technology Council) (1978), "Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulation buildings", Report No. ATC-3-06, Redwood City, California.
  6. Ayoub, A. and Chenouda, M. (2009), "Response spectra of degrading structural systems", Eng. Struct., 31, 1393-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.006
  7. Bayat, M. and Zahrai, S.M. (2017), "Seismic performance of midrise steel frames with semi-rigid connections having different moment capacity", Steel Compos. Struct., 25(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12989/SCS.2017.25.1.001
  8. Borzi, B. and Elnashai, A.S. (2000), "Refined force reduction factors for seismic design", Eng. Struct., 22, 1244-1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00075-9
  9. Cai, J., Zhou, J. and Fang, X. (2006), "Seismic ductility reduction factors for multi-degree-of-freedom systems", Adv. Struct. Eng., 9(5), 591-601. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943306778827547
  10. Carr, A. (2011) "RUAUMOKO, Inelastic dynamic analysis program", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cantenbury, Cantenbury, England.
  11. Chen, W.F. and Atsuta, T. (1971), "Interaction equations for biaxially loaded sections", Fritz Laboratory Report (72-9). Lehigh University, Paper 284.
  12. Chopra, A.K. (2008), Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
  13. Disque, R.O. (1964), "Wind connections with simple framing", Eng. J., AISC, 1(3), 101-103.
  14. Elnashai, A.S. and Elgazhouli, A.Y. (1994), "Seismic behavior of semi-rigid steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 29(1-3), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(94)90060-4
  15. Elnashai, A.S. and Mwafy, A.M. (2002), "Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Build., 11, 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.204
  16. Elnashai, A.S., Elghazouli, A.Y. and Denesh-Ashtiani, F.A. (1998), "Response of semi-rigid steel frames to cyclic and earthquake loads", J. Struct. Eng., 124(8), 857-867. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(857)
  17. FEMA (2000), State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking, SAC Steel Project FEMA-355C, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  18. Ganjavi, B. and Hao, H. (2012), "Effect of structural characteristics distribution of strength demand and ductility reduction factor of MDOF systems considering soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 11, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0111-7
  19. Gholipour, M., Mojtahedi, A. and Nourani, V. (2015) "Effect of semi-rigid connections in improvement of seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 19(2), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.2.467
  20. Hadianfard, M.A. (2012) "Using integrated displacement method to time-history analysis of steel frames with nonlinear flexible connections", Struct. Eng. Mech., 41(5), 675-689. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.5.675
  21. Hadianfard, M.A. and Razani, R. (2003), "Effects of semi-rigid behavior of connections in the reliability of steel frames", Struct. Saf., 25(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00046-2
  22. Hadjian, A.H. (1989), "An evaluation of the ductility reduction factor Q in the 1976 regulations for the federal district of Mexico", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 18, 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290180207
  23. Hetao, H. and Bing, Q. (2016), "Influence of cumulative damage on seismic response modification factors of elastic perfectly plastic oscillators", Adv. Struct. Eng., 19(9), 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216630119
  24. Karavasilis, T.L., Bazeos, N. and Beskos, D.E. (2008), "Drift and ductility estimates in regular steel MRF subjected to ordinary ground motions: A Design-Oriented approach", Earthq. Spectra, 24(2), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2923919
  25. Karmakar, D. and Gupta, V.K. (2006), "A parametric study of strength reduction factors for elasto-plastic oscillators", Sadhana, 31(4), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716781
  26. Kartal, M.E., Basaga, H.B., Bayraktar, A. and Muvafik, M. (2010), "Effects of semi-rigid connection on structural responses", Elec. J. Struct. Eng., 10, 22-35.
  27. Kishi, N., Chen, F., Goto, Y. and Matsuoka, K.G. (1993), "Design aid of semi-rigid connections for frame analysis", Eng. J., Am. Inst. Steel Constr., 30, 90-107.
  28. Leon, R.T. and Shin, K.J. (1995), "Performance of semi-rigid frames", Proceedings of Structures XIII Congress ASCE, New York USA.
  29. Levy, R., Rutenberg, A. and Qadi, Kh. (2006), "Equivalent linearization applied to earthquake excitations and the R-${\mu}$-To relationships", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 216-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.004
  30. Liu, Y. (2010), "Semi-rigid connection modeling for steel frameworks", Struct. Eng. Mech., 35(4), 431-547. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.35.4.431
  31. Liu, Y. and Lu, Z. (2014), "Seismic behavior of suspended building structures with semi-rigid connections", Earthq. Struct., 7(4), 415-448. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.415
  32. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V. (1994), "Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design", Earthq. Spectra, 10(2), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778
  33. Mohsenian, V. and Mortezaei, A. (2018), "Evaluation of seismic reliability and multi level response reduction factor (R factor) for eccentric braced frames with vertical links", Earthq. Struct., 14(6), 537-549. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2018.14.6.537
  34. Nader, M.N. and Astaneh-Asl, A. (1991), "Dynamic behavior of flexible, semi-rigid and rigid frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 18, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(91)90024-U
  35. Nassar, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1991), "Seismic demands of SDOF and MDOF systems", Research Report No. 95, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
  36. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1982), "Earthquake spectra and design monograph series", Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
  37. Ordaz, M. and Perez-Rocha, L.E. (1998), "Estimation of strengthreduction factors for elasto-plastic systems: a new approach", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(9), 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199809)27:9<889::AID-EQE755>3.0.CO;2-W
  38. Osman, A., Ghobarah, A. and Korol, M.R. (1995), "Implications of design philosophies of seismic response of steel moments frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 24, 1237-143.
  39. Osteraas, J.D. and Krawinkler, H. (1990), "Strength and ductility considerations in seismic design", Research Report No. 90, Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University.
  40. Reyes-Salazar, A. (2002), "Ductility and ductility reduction factors", Struct. Eng. Mech., 13(4), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2002.13.4.369
  41. Reyes-Salazar, A. and Haldar, A. (1999), "Nonlinear seismic response of steel structures with semi-rigid and composite connections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 51, 37-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00005-X
  42. Reyes-Salazar, A. and Haldar, A. (2000), "Dissipation of energy in steel frames with PR connections", Struct. Eng. Mech., 9(3), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.3.241
  43. Reyes-Salazar, A. and Haldar, A. (2001a), "Energy dissipation at PR frames under seismic loading", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 127(5), 588-593. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:5(588)
  44. Reyes-Salazar, A. and Haldar, A. (2001b), "Seismic response and energy dissipation in partially restrained and fully restrained steel frames: An analytical study", Steel Compos. Struct., 1(4), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2001.1.4.459
  45. Reyes-Salazar, A., Bojorquez, E., Lopez-Barraza, A., Leon-Escobedo, D. and Haldar, A. (2009), "Some issues regarding the structural idealization of perimeter moment-resisting steel frames", ISET J. Earthq. Technol., 46(3-4), 133-146.
  46. Reyes-Salazar, A., Bojorquez, E., Velazquez-Dimas, J.I., Lopez-Barraza, A. and Rivera-Salas, J.L. (2015), "Ductility and ductility reduction factors for steel buildings considering different structural representations", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(6), 1749-1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9676-z
  47. Reyes-Salazar, A., Cervantes-Lugo, J.A., Lopez-Barraza, A., Bojorquez, E. and Bojorquez, J. (2016), "Seismic response of 3D Steel buildings with hybrid connections: PRC and FRC", Steel Compos. Struct., 22(1), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.1.113
  48. Reyes-Salazar, A., Soto-Lopez, M.E., Bojorquez, E. and Lopez-Barraza, A. (2012), "Effect of modeling assumptions on the seismic behavior of steel buildings with perimeter moment frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 41(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.2.183
  49. Richard, R.M. (1993), "Moment-rotation curves for partially restrained connections", PRCONN, RMR Design Group, Tucson, Arizona.
  50. Richard, R.M. and Abbott, B.J. (1975), "Versatile elastic plastic stress-strain formula", ASCE J. Eng. Mech., 101(4), 511-515.
  51. Rupakhety, R. and Sigbjornsson, R. (2009), "Ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for inelastic displacement and ductility demands of constant-strength SDOF systems", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 7, 661-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9117-6
  52. Santa-Ana, P. and Miranda, E. (2000), "Strength reduction factors of multi-degree-of-freedom systems", 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 1446, Auckland, New Zealand.
  53. Serror, M.H., Diab, R.A. and Mourad, S.A. (2014), "Seismic force reduction factor for steel moment resisting frames with supplemental viscous dampers", Earthq. Struct., 7(6), 1171-1186. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1171
  54. Shooshtari, A., Moghaddam, S.H. and Masoodi, A.R. (2015), "Pushover analysis of gabled frames with semi-rigid connections", Steel Compos. Struct., 18(6), 1557-1568. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.18.6.1557
  55. Uang, C.M. (1991), "Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 117(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19)
  56. Uang, C.M. (1991), "Structural overstrength and limit state philosophy in seismic design provisions", Research Report No CE-91-0, Department of Civil Engineering, Northeastern University.
  57. Uang, C.M. and Bruneau, M. (2018), "State-of-the-art review on seismic design of steel structures", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 144(4).
  58. UBC (1997), Structural Engineering Design Provisions; International Conference of Building Officials.
  59. Valipour, H.R. and Bradford, M.A. (2013), "Nonlinear $P-{\Delta}$ analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid connections", Steel Compos. Struct., 14(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.14.1.001
  60. Whittaker, A., Hart, G. and Rojahn, C. (1999), "Seismic response modification factors", J. Struct. Eng., 125(4), 438-444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(438)