DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Local Arundinella hirta Collections in Korea against Drought Stress

  • Khan, Inam (Division of Applied Life Sciences (BK21Plus), IALS, PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Min, Chang-Woo (Division of Applied Life Sciences (BK21Plus), IALS, PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Byung-Hyun (Division of Applied Life Sciences (BK21Plus), IALS, PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2019.03.12
  • Accepted : 2019.03.18
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Drought is one of the key limiting factors that adversely affects the growth and productivity of crop plants. For the enhancement of drought tolerance in crop plants, the identification of basic mechanisms of a plant to drought stress is necessary. In this study, we compared physiological and biochemical responses of five local Arundenilla hirta ecotypes to drought stress. These ecotypes were previously collected from various parts of Korean peninsula, including Youngduk, Gunsan, Jangsoo, Jinju-1 and Yecheon. A. hirta plants were exposed to drought stress for 14 and 17 days respectively, followed by re-watering for 3 days. The results showed that the lipid peroxidation (MDA), hydrogen peroxide ($H_2O_2$), DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging activity, and proline level were significantly increased while the chlorophyll content was decreased by drought stress in A. hirta leaves. The highest proline content and DPPH scavenging activity were shown in Ecotype of Youngduk with least MDA and $H_2O_2$ levels while the highest MDA and $H_2O_2$ contents, and least proline and DPPH levels were shown in Gunsan, respectvely. These results indicate that the Youngduk is the most tolerant and Gunsan is the most sensitive ecotype among the five different collections. Together, these results provide a new insight of overall physiological responses of A. hirta to drought stress.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, A., Ali, Z., Quraishi, U.M., Kazi, A.G. Malik, R.N. Sher, H. and Mujeeb-Kazi, A. 2014. Integrating physiological and genetic approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops. Emerging technologies and management of crop stress tolerance academic press, USA. pp. 320-345.
  2. Chakhchar, A., Lamaoui, M., Aissam, S., Ferradous, A., Wahbi, S., Mousadik, A.E., Ibnsouda-Koraichi, S., Filali-Maltouf, A. and Modafar, C.E., 2016. Differential physiological and antioxidative responses to drought stress and recovery among four contrasting Argania spinosa ecotypes. Journal of Plant Interaction. 11:30-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2016.1148204
  3. Choudhury, F.K., Rivero, R.M., Blumwald, E. and Mittler, R., 2017. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. The Plant Journal. 95:856-867.
  4. Deeba, F., Pandey, A.K., Ranjan, S., Mishra, A., Singh, R., Sharma, Y.K., Shirke, P.A. and Pandey, V. 2012. Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton to drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 53:6-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.002
  5. Fang, Y. and Xiong, L., 2015. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 72:673-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1767-0
  6. Gaspar, T., Franck T. , Bisbis, B., Kevers, C., Jouve, L., Hausman, J.F. and Dommes, J. 2002. Concepts in plant stress physiology. application to plant tissue cultures. Plant Growth Regulator. 37:263-285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020835304842
  7. Hasanuzzaman, M., Mahmud, J.A., Anee, T.I., Nahar, K., and Islam, M.T., 2018. Drought stress tolerance in wheat: omics approaches in understanding and enhancing antioxidant defense. In:Zargar, S., Zargar, M. (Eds.), Abiotic Stress-Mediated Sensing and Signaling in Plants: An Omics Perspective. Springer, Singapore. pp. 267-307.
  8. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2013. Climate change 2013, In: Stocker T F et al. eds., Contribution of working Group I to the 5th Assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  9. Kang, H.M. and Saltveit, M.E. 2001. Antioxidant enzymes and DPPH radical scavenging activity in chilled and heat-shocked rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings radicles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 50:513-518. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011124d
  10. Kiani, S.P., Maury, P., Sarrafi, A. and Grieu, P. 2008. QTL analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in sunflower under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Plant Science. 175:565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.06.002
  11. Kishor, P.B.K., Sangam, S., Amrutha, R.N., Laxmi, P.S., Naidu, K.R., Rao, K.R.S.S., et al. (2005). Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Currunt Science. 88:424-438.
  12. Lee, K.W., Rahman, M.A., Kim, K.Y., Choi, G.J., Cha, J.Y., Cheong, M.S. and Lee, S.H. 2018. Overexpression of the alfalfa DnaJ-like protein (MsDJLP) gene enhances tolerance to chilling and heat stresses in transgenic tobacco plants. Turkish Journal of Biology. 42:12-22. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1705-30
  13. Lin, C.C. and Kao, C.H. 2001. Abscisic acid induced changes in cell wall peroxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide level in roots of rice seedlings. Plant Science. 160:323-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00396-4
  14. Liu, R., Liu, M., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., and Lu, C. 2010. Heterologus expression of an A. mongolicus late embryogenesis abundant protein gene (AmLEA) enhances Escherichia coli viability under cold and heat stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 60:163-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-009-9432-6
  15. Martinez, J.P., Silva, H., Ledent, J.F. and Pinto, M. 2007. Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans. European Journal of Agronomy. 26:30-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.08.003
  16. Massacci, A., Nabiev, S.M., Pietrosanti, L., Nematov, S.K., Chernikova, T.N., Thor, K. and Leipner, J. 2008. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 46:189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.10.006
  17. Rahman, M.A., Alam, I., Kim, Y.-G., Ahn, N.-Y., Heo, S.-H., Lee, D.-G., Liu, G. and Lee, B.-H. 2015. Screening for salt-responsive proteins in two contrasting alfalfa cultivars using a comparative proteome approach. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 89:112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.02.015
  18. Rahman, M.A., Kim, Y.-G., Alam, I., Liu, G., Lee, H., Lee, J.J. and Lee, B.-H. 2016. Proteome analysis of alfalfa roots in response to water deficit stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 15:1275-1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61255-2
  19. Razmjoo, K., Heydarizadeh, P. and Sabzalian, M.R. 2008. Effect of salinity and drought stresses on growth parameters and essential oil content of M. chamomile. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 10:451-454.
  20. Silva, P.A., Oliveira, I.V., Rodrigues, K.C.B., Cosme, V.S., Bastos, A.J.R., Detmann, K.S.C., Cunha, R.L., Festucci-Buselli, R.A., DaMatta, F.M. and Pinheiro, H.A. 2016. Leaf gas exchange and multiple enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant strategies related to drought tolerance in two oil palm hybrids. Trees. 30:203-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1289-x
  21. Wang, Q.Y., Guan, Y.C., Wu, Y.R., Chen, H.L., Chen, F. and Chu, C.C. 2008. Overexpression of a rice OsDREB1F gene increases salt, drought and low temperature tolerance in both Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Molcular Biology. 67:589-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-008-9340-6
  22. Zhang C., Shi, S., Liu, Z., Yang, F. and Yin, G. 2019. Drought tolerance in alfalfa varieties is associated with enhanced antioxidative protection and declined lipid peroxidation. Journal of Plant Physiology. 232:226-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.10.023